PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361

Lt. Washburn
Sep 26, 2008, 4:09 AM
Thanks for the pictures.

Will they have to raise the cranes up pretty soon?

HyperPower
Sep 27, 2008, 6:32 PM
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2873693151_9ff6d6280c_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3230/2873693093_4ffbaef8fe_o.jpg

...above the hole.

Lt. Washburn
Sep 27, 2008, 9:29 PM
Thanks!

theWatusi
Sep 27, 2008, 10:19 PM
What is that structure behind the FT infront of WTC7?

Zerton
Sep 27, 2008, 10:29 PM
I think thats the temporary PATH entrance

Ghost
Sep 28, 2008, 7:07 AM
Fantastic shots, thanks!

talltowers08
Sep 28, 2008, 1:57 PM
Great shots i was just wondering how do they raise the cranes ?

M.K.
Sep 28, 2008, 3:40 PM
My wondering is.. if they will put the Chicago Spire for on-hold some time cause the financial mortgages crises in US now, should have a chance also Freedom Tower and whole complex construction to be put on-hold as well ?

eMKay
Sep 28, 2008, 4:53 PM
My wondering is.. if they will put the Chicago Spire for on-hold some time cause the financial mortgages crises in US now, should have a chance also Freedom Tower and whole complex construction to be put on-hold as well ?

I think the chances of either project being put on hold because of the current economic troubles are very slim. First of all, the Freedom Tower is already funded. Second, the Chicago Spire is a very high end building, and rich people in position to buy such property are generally not affected by economic hiccups.

photoLith
Sep 28, 2008, 5:49 PM
They havent put the Chicago Spire on hold and dont start spreading rumors. Also, this project wont go on hold because theres too many people involved with it and lots of money invested into it. So the odds of either project going on hold is like nothing at all.

talltowers08
Sep 28, 2008, 6:13 PM
what about my question ^ How will they raise the cranes when it comes time ?

androo3
Sep 28, 2008, 8:51 PM
what about my question ^ How will they raise the cranes when it comes time ?

They are self rising... there is an external cage that goes on the steel tower that raises the crane and then a new tower section is added to the tower..bolted together then external cage is removed. Something along those lines anyways.

eMKay
Sep 28, 2008, 10:10 PM
They havent put the Chicago Spire on hold and dont start spreading rumors. Also, this project wont go on hold because theres too many people involved with it and lots of money invested into it. So the odds of either project going on hold is like nothing at all.

Yeah, exactly. I can't stand reading the Spire thread right now, because everyone seems to think that because they can't SEE work being done, that it's not being done. Just like this thread the last year or so. There has been so much work done on the foundation, but since nothing was rising,people though nothing was being done! It's so frustrating reading all these posts by people with no clue.

Dac150
Sep 28, 2008, 10:30 PM
Well just from looking at those above pics (taken from the 3 WFC I would say), in addition to seeing the site for myself on a daily basis, the progress that is taking place is simply outstanding. Work is being done on full force, and it seems that whenever I walk by the site I see steel being erected.

Lt. Washburn
Sep 28, 2008, 11:08 PM
Can anyone tell me how many floors or how many feet tall the base structure of this tower is? The part before it transitions to the faceted structure?

Anyone have a guess when it will reach that point? Perhaps within a year from now?

CHAPINM1
Sep 28, 2008, 11:49 PM
Can anyone tell me how many floors or how many feet tall the base structure of this tower is? The part before it transitions to the faceted structure?

Anyone have a guess when it will reach that point? Perhaps within a year from now?

I don't know the floor count, but I know that the base will be 186 feet high and will light up at night. ;)

sask1982
Sep 29, 2008, 6:26 PM
Is there going to be any underground parking anywhere at the WTC site? I haven't seen any indication of that or heard any discussion about it

talltowers08
Sep 29, 2008, 8:46 PM
:) Can anyone tell me how many floors or how many feet tall the base structure of this tower is? The part before it transitions to the faceted structure?

Anyone have a guess when it will reach that point? Perhaps within a year from now?

Basement levels 1-6 - Garage/Retail/Transportation
Ground floor - Main lobby
1st-45th floors (base) - Podium (not occupied on the base except for lobby)[citation needed]
46th-63rd floors - offices[citation needed]
64th floor - sky lobby
65th-84th floors - offices[citation needed]
85th-90th floors - transmission equipment[citation needed]
91st-100th floors - Mechanical
100th-101st floors - Restaurant
102nd floor - observation deck
103rd-108th floors - mechanical (unoccupied)
Top of the building - observation deck two (proposed)

Including basement floors, 1 World Trade Center will have a total of 114 floors. :)

Kamatzu
Sep 30, 2008, 2:13 AM
Looking good. Does the report come out tomorrow?

Crawford
Sep 30, 2008, 4:16 AM
Is there going to be any underground parking anywhere at the WTC site? I haven't seen any indication of that or heard any discussion about it

No, there will be no parking. Relatively few Manhattan office towers have parking.

sask1982
Sep 30, 2008, 5:27 AM
No, there will be no parking. Relatively few Manhattan office towers have parking.

What did the original WTC have for parking? Did it not?

A-K O.G.
Sep 30, 2008, 11:50 AM
Twin Towers had a relatively strong parking garage..

Zerton
Sep 30, 2008, 3:08 PM
What did the original WTC have for parking? Did it not?

remember what happened in 1993?

Dac150
Sep 30, 2008, 3:41 PM
Are you guys sure? I'm pretty sure I heard that there will be a garage. I know there will be one for commuter and tour buses.

jjk1103
Oct 1, 2008, 2:25 AM
:)

Basement levels 1-6 - Garage/Retail/Transportation
Ground floor - Main lobby
1st-45th floors (base) - Podium (not occupied on the base except for lobby)[citation needed]
46th-63rd floors - offices[citation needed]
64th floor - sky lobby
65th-84th floors - offices[citation needed]
85th-90th floors - transmission equipment[citation needed]
91st-100th floors - Mechanical
100th-101st floors - Restaurant
102nd floor - observation deck
103rd-108th floors - mechanical (unoccupied)
Top of the building - observation deck two (proposed)

Including basement floors, 1 World Trade Center will have a total of 114 floors. :)

....I guess I don't follow this tower much but ......the 1st 45 floors (base) are unoccupied ??? ..or did I read this wrong ?

Lecom
Oct 1, 2008, 3:16 AM
Are you guys sure? I'm pretty sure I heard that there will be a garage. I know there will be one for commuter and tour buses.

It will be in the underground levels of the entire WTC complex without any particular relation to the towers, and there will be no above ground parking. But you're right, the underground parking will accomodate buses.

talltowers08
Oct 1, 2008, 1:01 PM
....I guess I don't follow this tower much but ......the 1st 45 floors (base) are unoccupied ??? ..or did I read this wrong ?

No you didnt read it wrong i got this information from typing in freedom tower into google and u wikipedia it

eduardo88
Oct 1, 2008, 3:22 PM
No you didnt read it wrong i got this information from typing in freedom tower into google and u wikipedia it

why is there going to be nothing in the first 45 floors? seems like an incredible waste of space, it can't all be mechanical rooms, will they just sit empty?

A-K O.G.
Oct 1, 2008, 3:38 PM
Come on lets use our heads, you believe nearly half this tower will be vacant...
1st-45th floors (base) - Podium (not occupied on the base except for lobby)[citation needed].. ANYONE can add information to wikipedia...

http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=7788, THIS site states only the first 19 floors unoccupied, which makes more sense for a 186ft base. "which will contain the Freedom Tower's 80-foot tall lobby and three of its mechanical floors."
.

Take A look... http://www.renewnyc.com/images_WMS/freedom_tower/Section_06-27-06.jpg

talltowers08
Oct 1, 2008, 6:15 PM
I just read the informatation that is show it seems reliable but yeah maybe it is wrong. I thought it would be 45 floors vacant incase of car/ truck bombings to keep the workers of the tower safe. Touch wood it doesnt happen.

Kamatzu
Oct 2, 2008, 12:48 AM
What did the original WTC have for parking? Did it not?
The old WTC had underground parking, and I've seen a couple pictures with aboveground parking near the South Tower, which I still don't completely understand.

Anyway, the September status report on the WTC comes out tomorrow. (http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/coming-oct-2-september-wtc-report)
Something to look forward to! (Hopefully)

jjk1103
Oct 2, 2008, 4:13 AM
Come on lets use our heads, you believe nearly half this tower will be vacant...
1st-45th floors (base) - Podium (not occupied on the base except for lobby)[citation needed].. ANYONE can add information to wikipedia...

http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=7788, THIS site states only the first 19 floors unoccupied, which makes more sense for a 186ft base. "which will contain the Freedom Tower's 80-foot tall lobby and three of its mechanical floors."
.

Take A look... http://www.renewnyc.com/images_WMS/freedom_tower/Section_06-27-06.jpg

...ok, that makes a lot more sense. thanks

NYguy
Oct 2, 2008, 4:44 AM
The old WTC had underground parking, and I've seen a couple pictures with aboveground parking near the South Tower, which I still don't completely understand.

Yeah, the original WTC had underground parking. In fact, the Freedom Tower is being built over what remains of it. As far as surface parking, there was a little above ground parking on Church Street (in front of 4 and 5 WTC), but I don't remember exactly what it was for. It wasn't general public parking.

NYguy
Oct 2, 2008, 5:00 AM
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081001/FREE/810019973/1058/toc

Port Authority shocker: Trade Center making progress
Report due Thursday to conclude Silverstein can finish on schedule.

October 1, 2008

The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey is slated to announce Thursday that it will meet all its obligations to lay the groundwork that will allow Larry Silverstein to complete the three towers he is developing at World Trade Center site by 2012 as scheduled, sources say.

Thursday’s report, these say sources, will be nowhere near as bleak as imagined last June.

One source attributes the new, more optimistic view of progress at Ground Zero to design and engineering changes made in recent weeks. Currently, the Port Authority's Freedom Tower, like Mr. Silverstein’s buildings, are due to be finished by 2012.

Ghost
Oct 2, 2008, 6:33 AM
That's great news!

Starsky
Oct 2, 2008, 7:28 AM
Are they actually building vertically yet? All the government red tape!

Can you imagine back NYC in the 30's with buildings racing up at a floor a day! Hey, they look good and they are holding up just fine. So much for regulations.

NYC4Life
Oct 2, 2008, 8:49 AM
Are they actually building vertically yet? All the government red tape!

Can you imagine back NYC in the 30's with buildings racing up at a floor a day! Hey, they look good and they are holding up just fine. So much for regulations.

All the elements of the new WTC Complex are under construction, with the exception of 200 Greenwich (WTC Tower 2). The Port Authority has not yet completed excavation for the tower.

NYguy
Oct 2, 2008, 5:50 PM
http://curbed.com/archives/2008/10/02/ladies_gentlemen_your_new_and_improved_wtc_timetable_results_not_guaranteed.php#more

Ladies & Gentlemen, Your New and Improved WTC Timetable! (Results Not Guaranteed.)

Thursday, October 2, 2008, by Joey

The Port Authority issued its long-awaited report setting a new road map for the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site, the ass-kicking, name-taking final say on when our city's great shame will be replaced by memorials, museums, trains and gleaming glass towers filled with worker bees of uncertain employment. Now, issued press release just deals with the parts of the plan the Port Authority is in charge of (Freedom Tower, Santiago Calatrava's PATH station, the extension of Greenwich Street, etc.), but it is believed that developer Larry Silverstein will deliver Towers 3 and 4 in 2012, and Tower 2 (the diamondy one) a year later. On to the details!

NYguy
Oct 2, 2008, 6:19 PM
http://www.globest.com/news/1257_1257/newyork/174206-1.html

The report set a new timetable for completion of One World Trade Center, the Freedom Tower and the site's entire public infrastructure. One World Trade Center, the Freedom Tower, is scheduled for completion between the second and fourth quarters of 2013, at a cost of $3.1 billion.

The increased cost of One World Trade Center, the Freedom Tower, is due to price escalation and project changes, including increasing the size of the observation deck from one to two levels and reducing the restaurant to one level to accommodate the projected number of visitors to the rooftop location.

talltowers08
Oct 2, 2008, 6:28 PM
If that is the best they can do then that is it nothing more can be done to speed this up.

A-K O.G.
Oct 2, 2008, 6:38 PM
The Offical PA Report, (70)pages long, found here.. http://www.panynj.gov/pdf/WTC_Report_Oct_08.pdf
Quite A good Read, i find it intresting the minimized path station will cost more than 100 million more then the freedom tower itself..umm.

JDRCRASH
Oct 2, 2008, 7:31 PM
What will it take to get this finished?


World Trade Center site faces fresh delays

Thu Oct 2, 2008 2:34pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Freedom Tower, centerpiece of the plan to rebuild Manhattan's World Trade Center, will not be completed until 2013(WHAT????!!!), well past the original target date of 2009, the landowning agency for the site said on Thursday.

The 1,776-foot (541-meter) tower, which is meant to symbolize the city's revival after the September 11, 2001 attacks, will cost $3.1 billion, said Christopher Ward, executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

The Freedom Tower is the 16-acre site's most important office building, but other features will also be delayed, including the underground part of the memorial museum, a mass transit hub and part of the subway service that runs under it, said Ward, whose agency is overseeing the project.

Other parts of the memorial to the nearly 3,000 who perished -- the plaza, waterfalls, displays of victims' names and a gathering area -- will be finished by the 10th anniversary of the attacks, the agency promised.

The delays are the latest hurdles in the reconstruction of the World Trade Center, which has repeatedly stalled due to fights over insurance and wrangles between the major players -- state, city and federal agencies and developer Larry Silverstein, who leased it two months before it was destroyed.

Ward, who was appointed three months ago, was charged with issuing new and realistic cost estimates and timetables.

However, as the financial crisis grew worse this summer, many construction projects in the city and around the country were affected. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has noted that commodity prices, which had skyrocketed in recent years, have fallen and said this may help ease the cost burden.

Several major subways run through the site, in addition to the PATH trains that link Lower Manhattan with New Jersey, and these links were supposed to keep running during construction.

But now the No. 1 line will close for six weeks in the summer of 2010, and possibly also in part of 2009. PATH trains to the site will be shut some weekends from 2009 to 2011.

The hub, expected to cost $3.2 billion, will not be ready until the fourth quarter of 2013 or the second quarter of 2014. Its cost has spiraled by hundreds of millions of dollars, partly due its complexity, and it now will be simplified further by adding columns to the soaring open mezzanine envisioned by Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava.

A spokesman for Silverstein, who is building three office towers on the site, had no immediate comment. The agency has already fallen behind in site preparation work for Silverstein, and paid stiff fines to the developer as a result.

One problem is the demolition of the Deutsche Bank building, just south of the site, in order to build a $633 million vehicle security center. The work was halted last summer after two firefighters died in a fire there.

The U.S. government has bowed out of the security aspect of project, which now will open in the first to third quarters of 2012, said Ward.

(Editing by James Dalgleish)

37TimPPG
Oct 2, 2008, 8:17 PM
Wow! FT wont be complete until 2013!?

I'm getting so sick and tired of all these delays and politicians who don't know the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground.

You could never tell by looking at the pics from the live cam that this whole site is YEARS away from completion!

I'm Pissed!

...maybe if things turn out right the whole site will be completed by the 20th anniversary of 9/11 in 2021!!!

I realize this is an extremely complicated development. I just wish things would move along a little more quickly - as I am sure we all do. I mean no disrespect towards those who perished on 9/11 or anyone associated with this most momentious development.

A-K O.G.
Oct 2, 2008, 8:52 PM
Chill man, from an engineering standpoint this is an extremely complex site, you think downtown Atlanta was designed, funded, constructed, not to mention built by a standard security code never even imagined all in 13 years, all the while keeping in mind the respect for the families who lost loved ones, I dont..
Even if the site were to spring out of the ground at this very second, the vacancy rate for city office space is climbing at an alarming rate, leading to less value for the growing expense of this site, things will fall in place if not sooner, then later...
Im sick of people who cry for quick cheap development when they dont know the half of it, rather than waiting for quality product which is safer, will last longer and is more thought out, its about getting the best bang for your buck in a slipping market...
If you could see how many times I revise schematics for the smallest parts, im sure you would put a bullet in your head.. If you really want to help get off your computer, grab a shovel & put on a hard hat, walk down to the site & help them dig out the foundation for Silversteins Tower 2, It would do alot more then complaining, Thanks...

CHAPINM1
Oct 2, 2008, 10:28 PM
:previous: I definetly agree that this project take time and be built with the highest quality and effort. :previous:

Also, that's kickass news about the proposed roof observatory in addition to the one on floors 101 and 102. Anyway, things ARE happening!

CoolCzech
Oct 2, 2008, 11:53 PM
Also, that's kickass news about the proposed roof observatory in addition to the one on floors 101 and 102. Anyway, things ARE happening!

That's definitely some of the better news we've had about this tower in a long while. Now if only they could think of a way to accommodate a rooftop deck... :cool:

NYC4Life
Oct 3, 2008, 1:43 AM
Work on the site is being done, we will see it completed, even a few years late.

tone99loc
Oct 3, 2008, 2:12 AM
Personally, I'll be happy if I steel 5 stories above ground on Jan 1, 2009. Is that too much to ask for?

NYC2ATX
Oct 3, 2008, 2:46 AM
I'm very disappointed to hear of the design changes to the transit hub. If we keep simplifying it, it will not even be worth the trouble to maintain any aspect of the Calatrava design AT ALL. What's the point?

Seriously, I can't wait until 30-40 years from now, when everyone realizes how full of shit all this was.

NYguy
Oct 3, 2008, 2:57 AM
If that is the best they can do then that is it nothing more can be done to speed this up.

The tower will be completed in 2013, but there really is no big difference between 2011, 12, or 13. In fact, its not as if companies are knocking down the door to get into these towers, so the more time, the better. One of the reasons the towers are being built (besides replacing needed office space) is to restore the skyline. And as soon as these towers are topped off, it's mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned. The Bank of America tower isn't completed, but it is from a skyline standpoint. And finally, there are no delays, they're just telling us when these projects will be completed. Everyone knows these developments didn't begin when planned, so obviously they will be completed later.

NYguy
Oct 3, 2008, 3:04 AM
I'm very disappointed to hear of the design changes to the transit hub. If we keep simplifying it, it will not even be worth the trouble to maintain any aspect of the Calatrava design AT ALL. What's the point?

The Calatrava design is nice, but whatever they can do to cut the cost needs to be done. This is an office space development above anything else (not including the memorial). If anything, they can throw some of that money where its needed, like the Fulton St transit center just down the block (which many more people will use).

CHAPINM1
Oct 3, 2008, 3:20 AM
The tower will be completed in 2013, but there really is no big difference between 2011, 12, or 13. In fact, its not as if companies are knocking down the door to get into these towers, so the more time, the better. One of the reasons the towers are being built (besides replacing needed office space) is to restore the skyline. And as soon as these towers are topped off, it's mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned. The Bank of America tower isn't completed, but it is from a skyline standpoint. And finally, there are no delays, they're just telling us when these projects will be completed. Everyone knows these developments didn't begin when planned, so obviously they will be completed later.

Sorry if this is off topic, but I still think the Bank of America still has filling into do. The upper portion besides the spire has been incomplete for A YEAR ALREADY! Honostly, I wonder what the delay is with the completion of that project! It will be a year in December when the spire was completed and the building is still not completed.

NYguy
Oct 3, 2008, 3:26 AM
Sorry if this is off topic, but I still think the Bank of America still has filling into do. The upper portion besides the spire has been incomplete for A YEAR ALREADY! Honostly, I wonder what the delay is with the completion of that project! It will be a year in December when the spire was completed and the building is still not completed.

They have had several issues already with that tower, including glass falling a few times, and work has been halted a few times as a result.

If I can get back to the Calatrava design for a minute, here's an example of some of the "changes" we are talking about:

(downtown express)

http://www.downtownexpress.com/JULIESCO.jpg

The new design for the W.T.C. PATH station’s belowground mezzanine (right) adds columns and makes Santiago Calatrava’s original design (left) easier to construct. The design simplification will allow the 9/11 memorial to open by the 10th anniversary

NYC4Life
Oct 3, 2008, 7:52 AM
Considering much of the site is still just dirt, and Tower Two's foundation is still being excavated, the revised schedules are realistic.

A-K O.G.
Oct 3, 2008, 11:51 AM
I'm very pleased with this new time table, not necessairly the dates, but they do seem very realistic, good to think we shouldnt have to expect more lengthly delays (not to say it couldn't happen)... Seems like full steam ahead..

A-K O.G.
Oct 3, 2008, 11:55 AM
I'm very pleased with this new time table due to the fact we shouldn't have to expect more lenghtly delays (not that it couldn't happen)...full steam ahead... how do i delete posts, sorry...

Apathanoia
Oct 3, 2008, 11:09 PM
Hmmm...so comparing the old 2007 info (http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_277/waitforwtc.html)with this...

1 WTC/FT was 2014, now 2013
2 WTC was 2015, now 2013
3 WTC was 2014, now 2012
4 WTC was 2012, still 2012
Memorial Museum was 2015, now 2013
PATH Station was 2016, now 2014

The memorial itself is set for 9/11/2011, and the DB demo should be finished next August. Fiterman Hall (if you even remember it) is likely to remain the way it is...it isn't included in the plans.

So we have a probabilistic net savings of approximately 9 years for the 16 acres based on this...? What else has been changed besides having columns in the PATH station?

NYC4Life
Oct 4, 2008, 1:21 AM
Within 6 years, assuming there are no further delays, the site will be complete. The current progress at the site is undeniable.

NYC4Life
Oct 4, 2008, 1:30 AM
Today at 4:45 PM - From EarthCam

I enhanced the original EarthCam capture in Photoshop.

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2516/77173605sb3.jpg

MONACO
Oct 5, 2008, 12:20 AM
Hell.....This is actually moderately reassuring.




Hmmm...so comparing the old 2007 info (http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_277/waitforwtc.html)with this...

1 WTC/FT was 2014, now 2013
2 WTC was 2015, now 2013
3 WTC was 2014, now 2012
4 WTC was 2012, still 2012
Memorial Museum was 2015, now 2013
PATH Station was 2016, now 2014

The memorial itself is set for 9/11/2011, and the DB demo should be finished next August. Fiterman Hall (if you even remember it) is likely to remain the way it is...it isn't included in the plans.

So we have a probabilistic net savings of approximately 9 years for the 16 acres based on this...? What else has been changed besides having columns in the PATH station?

skellergroup
Oct 5, 2008, 3:16 AM
This is so frustrating. I wish they just went back to the old design.

Just-In-Cali
Oct 5, 2008, 3:54 AM
Chill man, from an engineering standpoint this is an extremely complex site, you think downtown Atlanta was designed, funded, constructed, not to mention built by a standard security code never even imagined all in 13 years, all the while keeping in mind the respect for the families who lost loved ones, I dont..
Even if the site were to spring out of the ground at this very second, the vacancy rate for city office space is climbing at an alarming rate, leading to less value for the growing expense of this site, things will fall in place if not sooner, then later...
Im sick of people who cry for quick cheap development when they dont know the half of it, rather than waiting for quality product which is safer, will last longer and is more thought out, its about getting the best bang for your buck in a slipping market...
If you could see how many times I revise schematics for the smallest parts, im sure you would put a bullet in your head.. If you really want to help get off your computer, grab a shovel & put on a hard hat, walk down to the site & help them dig out the foundation for Silversteins Tower 2, It would do alot more then complaining, Thanks...

Hmm, I would suggest you take your own advice.
I have been following this project from the outset, as many here have. I do not live in New York, Im from Los Angeles, but I work in the design field, specifically architectual and mechanical engineering. I have seen many plans roll across my desk over the years, and I must say that the number of delays and overuns here would usually kill a project outright. This was not well thought out at all. All the designers want their imprint on this, and so they have complicated the project to the extent that there has been a virtual paralysis at the site for over 5 years. Only now are we seeing the smallest bit of real dynamic progress. Im glad for that at least, but its not wrong to demand accountability to those that have so mucked up this ever so important site. The worst part is its turning this iconic project into a footnote in the history of our ever fading status of a superpower. :(
All that said, lets just hope they can maintain their current schedule. It will be a marvel when finished, but its lost much of its luster. If they can pull off a miracle and get it done faster, then all of the critics, including me, can shut it...until then, I wont silence my disapointment. When did "half assed" become the standard for our country?

Kamatzu
Oct 5, 2008, 9:05 PM
Christopher Ward is a godsend. Where was he in 2002 when we needed him? =P

Good to see this is happening.

Also, what's this I hear about a rooftop obs. deck proposal? When did this happen?

A-K O.G.
Oct 6, 2008, 5:01 PM
Just-In-Cali,

Im sure a 3+ billion dollar plan has never rolled across your desk, the more expensive, obviously more intreicate, is generally going to have more redraws and more time getting things to work better together, at the start would you have proposed to build the roof of the transite center first to accomidate a faster rebuild of a memorial, I wouldn't of, didnt even think of it, but now its necessary in order to have this memorial near complete in 2011 instead of 3 years later, things come up, and when they do its always best to slow down, work out the best solution and go from there, an extra month of planning can save time even if your not building within that month....

Giving the nature of this site & significance to our country and every citizen, it would make sense alot of people would like to contribute, wouldnt you have liked to have some of your architecture displayed for this site, a site which people will make special trips to this city just to see? I sure would.. , I've taken my advice

BrandonJXN
Oct 6, 2008, 9:19 PM
This is so frustrating. I wish they just went back to the old design.

THIS?

http://www.glasssteelandstone.com/Images/US/NY/NYC/FreedomTower-002.jpg

NYC4Life
Oct 7, 2008, 2:17 AM
I think he meant this:

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2002/wtc.ideas/designs/page.121/1.jpg

NYC4Life
Oct 7, 2008, 5:17 AM
Latest model of the Freedom Tower (Top portion at least)

By: philvia (http://www.wirednewyork.com/forum/member.php?u=15193) - Wired New York

http://i38.tinypic.com/rszd51.jpg

Apathanoia
Oct 7, 2008, 5:28 AM
I think he meant this:


Or maybe...:gaah: new Twin Towers:gaah:
You could modify your image to have a twin flag tower (no Jesus though).:laugh:

Oh, and about the Just-in-Cali question of when half-assed became the standard...The answer is when they chose the politicians to handle everything.

...and about the rooftoop deck...wouldn't that mean the loss of the spire/antenna and reduce the official height to 1358 or something feet? The original WTC had the deck on the tower without the antenna, and the new one would have less space to stand on, even w/o the spire.

Just-In-Cali
Oct 7, 2008, 4:25 PM
Just-In-Cali,

Im sure a 3+ billion dollar plan has never rolled across your desk,

Giving the nature of this site & significance to our country and every citizen, it would make sense alot of people would like to contribute, wouldnt you have liked to have some of your architecture displayed for this site, a site which people will make special trips to this city just to see? I sure would.. , I've taken my advice

Actually, The Getty in Los Angeles, LA Live in downtown LA, and Petco Park in San Diego have all rolled across my desk at one time or another for work.
LA live is pushing 2 Billion, so yeah, I know what that is like. And of course everyone wants their name imprinted on a massive high profile project. My point was, all of the in fighting and political pandering going on has hindered what could have been an quick and inspiring construction. Not that they cant catch up, but they could have done much better. I just want to see them ramp it up now and show us all that it can be done.
Sorry to step on your proverbial toes...and I know you guys get VERY sensitive about the topic, but I was just taken aback at the tone of your first message.

CGII
Oct 7, 2008, 8:36 PM
http://i38.tinypic.com/rszd51.jpg

UGH. I'm so sick of these budget cuts.


;)

M.K.
Oct 7, 2008, 9:20 PM
I think he meant this:

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2002/wtc.ideas/designs/page.121/1.jpg

Actually that is not too bad, it means Jesus receiving everybody and why not the Liberty Statue as well. Very nice thought btw. It is like the huge most famous 2 statues communicating side-by-side, strange, but the most racional sense of freedom...

BrandonJXN
Oct 7, 2008, 9:34 PM
^ Good point but it would never work.

CGII
Oct 7, 2008, 9:40 PM
Actually that is not too bad, it means Jesus receiving everybody and why not the Liberty Statue as well. Very nice thought btw. It is like the huge most famous 2 statues communicating side-by-side, strange, but the most racional sense of freedom...

That is the most terrifying proposal I have ever seen, and not just because I'm a hardcore atheist.

Apathanoia
Oct 7, 2008, 11:21 PM
http://gothamist.com/2008/10/07/wtc_memorial_may_open_for_91110_but.php

I don't know how much this belongs here (idk if there is a separate WTC memorial topic), but it looks like it took just five days for something to be pushed back even further...at most the memorial will be open for a few days on the 10th anniversary but close for another year for more construction.

NYguy
Oct 8, 2008, 12:14 AM
wtcrising.com

http://www.wtcrising.com/images/FE/chain217siteType8/site187/client/photoGallery/189/D2B0AB20-7E93-EE10-E8521F968F9A6F2B_big.jpg

http://www.wtcrising.com/images/FE/chain217siteType8/site187/client/photoGallery/189/D2A1C894-7E93-EE10-E94434E72AC425CA_big.jpg

From Amir Farshad Ebrahimimi (http://flickr.com/photos/farshadebrahimi/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3111/2891589341_ea460e9251_o.jpg


From Mike Robers NYC (http://flickr.com/photos/mikebroberts/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3285/2830072352_e42657580b_b.jpg

A-K O.G.
Oct 8, 2008, 4:40 PM
Actually, The Getty in Los Angeles, LA Live in downtown LA, and Petco Park in San Diego have all rolled across my desk at one time or another for work.
LA live is pushing 2 Billion.

-My apologies for lack of credit where credit is due, pretty impressive, but i dont think it's all to far behind, 7WTC went up faster then i can remember simply due to the fact people behind it didnt have to rely on the PA, & with an extra 200+ million from the PA silverstein has just now gotten underway with his main projects, though they went through the finial design approvals months ago. Looking at the Port Authority, yea I believe way too many people were involved, (and still are) in this, but from the enginering-design team of Silverstein they completed as much as they could ON TIME as the PA would allow, since silverstein & the PA seem to have as much stake in the project as the next their both taking blame for the progress at the site when all it is is lack of management on behalf of the P.A. NY/NJ. Later this week,(probably next) when the east bathtub is handed down to Silverstein I believe then we will see amazing progress at every corner of the site, hold your breath..

vanhenrik
Oct 9, 2008, 3:32 AM
from babylon a d

http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/1384/vlcsnap376334nn9.png

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/6668/vlcsnap366484od6.png

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4785/vlcsnap366667mu1.png

http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/3601/vlcsnap366742pt4.png

androo3
Oct 9, 2008, 4:13 AM
Would this building go up very very fast once they get to the lobby due to the fact there is much to the first 200 feet?

NYC4Life
Oct 9, 2008, 5:34 AM
By: econ_tim (http://wirednewyork.com/forum/member.php?u=11327) - Wired New York

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3008/2917196928_4b48fc6388.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2917194792_7168e21098.jpg

Northfield
Oct 9, 2008, 5:30 PM
Well i'm happy to see this baby finally start to go skyward! Hopefully i'll be in the city soon and maybe take a few pics myself.

PhxSprawler
Oct 9, 2008, 5:33 PM
Actually that is not too bad, it means Jesus receiving everybody and why not the Liberty Statue as well. Very nice thought btw. It is like the huge most famous 2 statues communicating side-by-side, strange, but the most racional sense of freedom...

Jesus receiving everybody... except gays, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Taoists, and pro-choice supporters. Great message of freedom.

On a positive note, it is great to see progress!

RockMont
Oct 9, 2008, 9:01 PM
Jesus receiving everybody... except gays, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Taoists, and pro-choice supporters. Great message of freedom.

On a positive note, it is great to see progress!



Ah, excuse me. I don't think this has anything to do with the significance of what this particular thread stands for, so you might want to take your hatemongering, or your version of it to another thread or forum. Only the last sentence is relevant.

Apathanoia
Oct 9, 2008, 11:23 PM
from babylon a d



From what I heard, that movie was crap.:maddown:

But given these images of 2 WTC (which was shown in commercials), I wonder why that is #2 and not the Freedom Tower. The 1776 point would have been the top corner, the building would still be without an antenna or spire, and the beam of light coming from the center could alternate between red, white, and blue.:tomato: :fruit: :righton:

NYC4Life
Oct 9, 2008, 11:48 PM
From: lowermanhattan.info

http://www.wtcrising.com/images/FE/chain217siteType8/site187/client/photoGallery/189/D2B0AB20-7E93-EE10-E8521F968F9A6F2B_big.jpg

NYguy
Oct 10, 2008, 4:02 AM
from babylon a d

http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/1384/vlcsnap376334nn9.png

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/6668/vlcsnap366484od6.png

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4785/vlcsnap366667mu1.png

http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/3601/vlcsnap366742pt4.png

Yeah, I saw that movie. Tower 2 also appeared in a comic book as well, I don't remember exactly which one, but it was D.C.

Zerton
Oct 12, 2008, 10:21 PM
They have had several issues already with that tower, including glass falling a few times, and work has been halted a few times as a result.

If I can get back to the Calatrava design for a minute, here's an example of some of the "changes" we are talking about:

(downtown express)

http://www.downtownexpress.com/JULIESCO.jpg

The new design for the W.T.C. PATH station’s belowground mezzanine (right) adds columns and makes Santiago Calatrava’s original design (left) easier to construct. The design simplification will allow the 9/11 memorial to open by the 10th anniversary

Do you know of any other similar examples?

Kamatzu
Oct 12, 2008, 10:56 PM
Does anyone know why the north core hasn't risen since like... February?

Just curious.

NYguy
Oct 13, 2008, 11:25 PM
Do you know of any other similar examples?

Another example would be the opening that was to be in the "roof" of the main building. But those are the biggest changes visually.

NYguy
Oct 13, 2008, 11:26 PM
More skyline, model shots.

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/104519123/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/104519136/original.jpg

Wheelingman04
Oct 14, 2008, 8:27 PM
^ Great models.

Realthang
Oct 15, 2008, 2:06 AM
In case you all didn't notice, the south core jumped again late this afternoon. The south crane is going to have to rise pretty soon, isn't it?

NYC4Life
Oct 15, 2008, 3:32 AM
The crane is getting swallowed up by the rising core.

Ghost
Oct 15, 2008, 6:40 AM
But what the hell is taking so long with the north core?

theWatusi
Oct 15, 2008, 12:12 PM
^ Due to economic troubles they are only going to build the South half of the tower at this time.

Puzzlecraft
Oct 15, 2008, 3:56 PM
Anyone know how many feet are involved with a core jump? If it is one floor per jump, then given the known three intervals in days, between the last four jumps (47 days, 63 days, 49 days), it will take around 14 years to build the building, lol. My guess is the core won't be so massively thick on the higher floors. Iit is taking a long time to do the rebar.

NYguy
Oct 16, 2008, 8:00 PM
^ Our patience will be rewarded.


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/104641641/original.jpg

NYC4Life
Oct 16, 2008, 10:40 PM
Nice to see this latest rendering without its neighbor, Goldman Sachs Headquarters.

HyperPower
Oct 17, 2008, 12:28 AM
Tell the truth, do you people really like the spire on this tower? I hope they are going to fix it before they top out. It seems abnormal everytime I look at it.

It will be nice to see anything at this point in the Financial Disctrict as tall as this baby. I feel Foster's WTC 2 will overshadow or be the attention graber over this tower though.

rich_200
Oct 17, 2008, 2:57 AM
^
Other than if it should or should not count for the height(that I think it shouldn't) I like the spire because it is covered and not so thin so you can clearly see it from a distance so it is not just a pathetic attempt to be the tallest one, as the NYTT's spire

NYguy
Oct 17, 2008, 5:57 AM
^
Other than if it should or should not count for the height(that I think it shouldn't) I like the spire because it is covered and not so thin so you can clearly see it from a distance so it is not just a pathetic attempt to be the tallest one, as the NYTT's spire

That's an old rendering, so forget about that version of the spire.
It's the same height though, and just as thick. It's almost a little too thick for a spire, but it will wrap around an antenna.