PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361

Duck From NY
May 30, 2012, 9:10 AM
Everything you say is totally normal: it a sort of 'death syndrome" : people or things are by far more appreciated after their disparition.
Same for titanic, the perfect example of how an unsignificant ship became a legend after it sinked.


For 1WTC, i suppose the new tower has been designed to resist plane attacks, or parking bombs (that's the reason of the concrete base, i imagine)

I still think the Twin Towers were ugly, no offense to anyone. I like 1 WTC, and I think most people do so far.

NYguy
May 30, 2012, 12:16 PM
Enough of the Twin Towers people. There are multiple threads to discuss them over in the B&A forum.


Jon's Album (http://www.flickr.com/photos/65061445@N08/7294705434/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8011/7294705434_aaed3bd3db_b.jpg



Vejvoda (http://www.flickr.com/photos/srdjan_vejvoda/7299938844/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7103/7299938844_134b602507_b.jpg



travellingcari (http://www.flickr.com/photos/travellingcari/7291378240/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7239/7291378240_2017a2c810_h.jpg



have you eaten yet? (http://www.flickr.com/photos/8232914@N02/7299197292/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/7299197292_f3cc43ef5e_h.jpg

RockMont
May 30, 2012, 4:32 PM
I'm sure 2 and maybe 3 WTC will make up for it. Especially 2 WTC since it could create that mock Twin Towers-like view from the harbor.

The problem is that the Port Authority needs to pull its collective head out of its collective ass, and get with the program. Those buildings #2 and #3 were designed to replace what was there. The twins, and the short rises, and whatever else was there. Like Mr. Silverstein said, just to build the damn things and accept whatever finincial risk there is. Instead they're just pinching every penny, and hoarding every dollar they can. Bunch of greedy beaureaucratic bastards!

RockMont
May 30, 2012, 5:14 PM
People need to get over, being spooked by the shapes of buildings. If that is the case, are we going to be spooked by the shape of a Boeing 757, or 767, every time we have to get on a plane and fly somewhere? Are people going to be spooked by a large truck, driving down the road, similar to the one that Timothy McVeigh used when he bombed the government building in Oklahoma City? What about something like an auto mishap, involving a certain type of vehicle? Any vehicle. It would be like being scared of, for example being scared of a SUV driving down the street, or riding in one, just because you were involved in an accident, where that type was involved. Come on folks, life itself is a risk in its own right, lets stop being scared of something because of something so superficial, such as the architectural style of buildings. That was what those middle-eastern lowlives wanted, was for us to be afraid. Instead we need to be more defiant. I'd like to believe that they were not rebuild in that style because it was outdated and not economically feasible. Unfortunately, though, I think that idiot governor at that time, was thinking otherwise. Too many people scared of what the shape of what they were before. We need to get over ourselves.

uaarkson
May 30, 2012, 6:18 PM
Someone who can't get over the loss of the twin towers should not be preaching to people about getting over anything. Also, get this discussion in the appropriate thread, for the love of fuck.

CarlosV
May 30, 2012, 6:24 PM
:)

It looks like steel is being erected on top of 1 WTC! as well as 4 WTC :banana:

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7303326718_c33e6726e1_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303326718/)
DSC_0072 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303326718/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 6:27 PM
:)

It looks like steel is being erected on top of 1 WTC! as well as 4 WTC :banana:

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7303326718_c33e6726e1_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303326718/)
DSC_0072 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303326718/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

Yes! Carlos if this is correct One World Trade Center is now 1,313 feet tall.

PZelda
May 30, 2012, 6:35 PM
Sorry, that wasn't my intention. When I think of that day, I think of all the people who never made it home. The ones who boarded the 4 planes, not knowing they would die very shortly after.

I have every intention of going to 1 WTC when it opens and visiting the observatory, as I never had the opportunity pre-9/11 to go to New York. I just wanted to give my .02, and that came out worse than that sounded and again I apologize.

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 6:37 PM
Sorry, that wasn't my intention. When I think of that day, I think of all the people who never made it home. The ones who boarded the 4 planes, not knowing they would die very shortly after.

I have every intention of going to 1 WTC when it opens and visiting the observatory, as I never had the opportunity pre-9/11 to go to New York. I just wanted to give my .02, and that came out worse than that sounded and again I apologize.

It's alright, but you shouldn't make yourself look fearful. You are letting the terrorists win you over. No one wants that.

CarlosV
May 30, 2012, 6:38 PM
^^^

it is true!!!! :cheers:

took out my big guns! (800 mm lens) :)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7235/7303443602_a99c252aa1_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303443602/)
DSC_0073 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303443602/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

NewYorkDominates
May 30, 2012, 6:40 PM
That has to be the smallest piece of steel ever put.

sw5710
May 30, 2012, 6:40 PM
Steel column is up to floor 104 with splices 1,317'

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 6:42 PM
That has to be the smallest piece of steel ever put.

It might look small, but that beam is 20 feet high.

PZelda
May 30, 2012, 6:48 PM
It's alright, but you shouldn't make yourself look fearful. You are letting the terrorists win you over. No one wants that.

That's true! I do agree (and hope) that an event on that kind of scale will never happen again. I have followed this project from the beginning and I've found it fascinating what has been done to ensure another attack doesn't happen. But - I am not a serious skyscraper enthusiast like most/all of you guys are... So - I am learning! And seeing things differently.

PZelda
May 30, 2012, 6:51 PM
I wonder - will this be the jump where the corners finally meet to complete the triangles? They were super close to meeting with the last jump. :)

NYC GUY
May 30, 2012, 6:52 PM
^^^
So the next jump will be the parapet?

sw5710
May 30, 2012, 7:20 PM
I wonder - will this be the jump where the corners finally meet to complete the triangles? They were super close to meeting with the last jump. :)

This takes us to floor # 104 at 1,313' 10'' The next jump will be to the roof #105 or 1,334' 8''
That is where the corners meet. The roof.

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 7:24 PM
^^^
So the next jump will be the parapet?

No we still have floor 105 next. After that is the parapet. However Four World Trade Center's next jump is the parapet. Four World Trade Center is going to finish first.

Modulair
May 30, 2012, 7:28 PM
new steel...
So it means that.....
... that 1WTC has reached 400 meters !!!

:cheers: :cheers:

ultimate milestone !!!

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 7:29 PM
new steel...
So it means that.....
... that 1WTC has reached 400 meters !!!

:cheers: :cheers:

ultimate milestone !!!

Yes! Exactly 400 meters.

PZelda
May 30, 2012, 7:31 PM
This takes us to floor # 104 at 1,313' 10'' The next jump will be to the roof #105 or 1,334' 8''
That is where the corners meet. The roof.

Sweet! :D I was thinking of the rendering that Carlos did about a month or so back (illustrating how close it was to T/O) then Otie posted a diagram... We had all agreed there was about 100 feet until the corners met, but I'm not sure what floor it was at the time.

Sooooo close now!! :)

CarlosV
May 30, 2012, 8:17 PM
7 columns added so far :)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7086/7303987884_2543aa64eb_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303987884/)
DSC_0076 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7303987884/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

chris123678
May 30, 2012, 8:21 PM
So, these columns are for the 104 floor?
They are really small?
Also since when was there a 105 floor?

Roadcruiser1
May 30, 2012, 8:30 PM
So, these columns are for the 104 floor?
They are really small?
Also since when was there a 105 floor?

These are columns for floor 104. There was always a floor 105.

1Boston
May 30, 2012, 8:56 PM
Lost the Battle?
Regardless of whether we built here or not. The Battle was won on May 1, 2011.
The spire does not determine whether we win a battle. It's the fact that we rebuild. Although it will take some time, when towers 2 and 3 stand with One and Four. We will have a beautiful safe enviroment filled with architecture beauty.
No site is perfect,

We're talking about two different things. You're talking about the general wtc site going up, I'm talking about the design of the building. We lost the battle with Durst ruining the design of 1wtc, I think everyone can agree with that. The only winner there is Durst.

chris123678
May 30, 2012, 9:03 PM
We're talking about two different things. You're talking about the general wtc site going up, I'm talking about the design of the building. We lost the battle with Durst ruining the design of 1wtc, I think everyone can agree with that. The only winner there is Durst.

Durst didn't ruin the the design.
Most of the changes they did, with the exception of the spire was for the better of the building.

RockMont
May 30, 2012, 9:08 PM
All the changes, the spire notwithstanding were for the better. This design is much better than, Leibeskind's original nightmare. The one he thought he was going to kill birds with by letting them fly into windmills and fan propellers.

jd3189
May 30, 2012, 9:12 PM
We're talking about two different things. You're talking about the general wtc site going up, I'm talking about the design of the building. We lost the battle with Durst ruining the design of 1wtc, I think everyone can agree with that. The only winner there is Durst.
Agreed. I wish I could be excited about 1 WTC reaching this achievement but the fact that this is another step closer to that dumb crappy antenna getting erected has ruined it for me. I guess there's hope. The radome was originally supposed to be installed after the antenna structure was erected in the way the glass windows are installed after a steel floor is prepared. This means anything this summer could change the PA and Durst's mind to implement the radome again or another different material for the spire.

RockMont
May 30, 2012, 9:17 PM
Lost the Battle?
Regardless of whether we built here or not. The Battle was won on May 1, 2011.
The spire does not determine whether we win a battle. It's the fact that we rebuild. Although it will take some time, when towers 2 and 3 stand with One and Four. We will have a beautiful safe enviroment filled with architecture beauty.
No site is perfect,

Yeah the battle was won, when the vermin, bin laden was summarily, and appropriately executed, and sprayed with bullets, and other good ammo, and sent to where he belongs. Sorry Michael Moore, you don't give a fair trial to a mass murderer, in the midst of a war. If not for fighting back, it no doubt would have been another holocaust. Then what would all the naysayers blame it on?

CarlosV
May 30, 2012, 10:36 PM
Almost there!!

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7231/7304747584_11367195ee_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7304747584/)
DSC_0072 acopy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7304747584/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

NYguy
May 30, 2012, 11:52 PM
A bit older, but I like the view...

Jack Berman (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbnycphoto/7301683436/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8012/7301683436_0364fcc725_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8012/7301683436_62496f5053_h.jpg



Elvert Barnes (http://www.flickr.com/photos/perspective/7302439810/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7227/7302439810_23a5a49ce8_h.jpg

pnapp1
May 31, 2012, 1:19 AM
WTC Progress Facebook:
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/542146_324211110989467_109423129134934_731698_416547856_n.jpg
http://www.facebook.com/wtcprogress

Hypothalamus
May 31, 2012, 1:46 AM
:worship: I can't wait until this is topped out! :worship:

Chapelo
May 31, 2012, 2:17 AM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8142/7305495262_ab3ff34ecc_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305495262/)
1 World Trade Center (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305495262/) by Vin Schiano (http://www.flickr.com/people/vinschiano/), on Flickr

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7074/7305493946_013127b161_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305493946/)
1 World Trade Center (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305493946/) by Vin Schiano (http://www.flickr.com/people/vinschiano/), on Flickr

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8150/7305496766_cc09fec35e_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305496766/)
1 World Trade Center (http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinschiano/7305496766/) by Vin Schiano (http://www.flickr.com/people/vinschiano/), on Flickr

^^ I love Vin's shots from this angle; really captures how massive this tower is.

TechTalkGuy
May 31, 2012, 5:10 AM
If the Goldman Sachs Tower were 200 feet taller, then this would really compliment One World Trade Center as the skyline redefines itself.

gramsjdg
May 31, 2012, 5:27 AM
Yeah the battle was won, when the vermin, bin laden was summarily, and appropriately executed, and sprayed with bullets, and other good ammo, and sent to where he belongs. Sorry Michael Moore, you don't give a fair trial to a mass murderer, in the midst of a war. If not for fighting back, it no doubt would have been another holocaust. Then what would all the naysayers blame it on?

Please people, this is a forum about the construction of 1WTC, not a political forum.

NYguy
May 31, 2012, 10:51 AM
• estatik • (http://www.flickr.com/photos/estatik/7305195896/sizes/h/in/photostream/)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8002/7305195896_934457f8e9_h.jpg



Michael C Dunne (http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelcdunne/7306242944/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7239/7306242944_2e20ec2d03_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/7306233402_ac28b57e36_b.jpg



montezoraida (http://www.flickr.com/photos/montezoraida/7297062772/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7101/7297062772_3e5bce7eed_b.jpg



FWNYPAO (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwnypao/7280397718/sizes/h/in/set-72157629892734042/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8152/7280397718_cfa4b5cc74_h.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8021/7296517484_726aeb3faf_h.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8167/7296518434_2f57b83110_h.jpg



Tom Turner - SeaTeamImages / AirTeamImages (http://www.flickr.com/photos/11606523@N06/7266022364/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7224/7266022364_707475b509_b.jpg

CarlosV
May 31, 2012, 12:06 PM
A perfect morning on the last day in May.......67 degrees

9 visible columns

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7092/7307762244_d692dda6f2_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7307762244/)
DSC_0079 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7307762244/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

Noll
May 31, 2012, 2:17 PM
http://360.io/9rF4tm - Panorama view from the 91st floor.

http://360.io/CMcnAn - Panorama view from the 27th floor.

Charlie Potts
May 31, 2012, 2:26 PM
A bit older, but I like the view...

Jack Berman (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbnycphoto/7301683436/sizes/l/in/photostream/)





http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8012/7301683436_62496f5053_h.jpg







Beautiful shot! I need some sort of guide to tell me the names of these buildings. For example what is the strange modern temple-ish looking building just to the left of the American International building? And is that yellow and black building a residential tower?

hunser
May 31, 2012, 3:06 PM
^^ The building adjacent to AIG is 60 Wall Street. And the black- yellow dotted building is the William Beaver House.

Dense_Electric
May 31, 2012, 3:12 PM
Ooh, tiny columns. What are those, about ten feet? This must be in preparation for the pre-fab nodes to be installed on the corners.

dar124
May 31, 2012, 4:24 PM
That has to be the smallest piece of steel ever put.

It might look small, but that beam is 20 feet high.



FYI, from yesterday.

castellammare
May 31, 2012, 4:34 PM
Hi everybody, I just wanted to introduce myself to the forum real quick - I've been following this thread for over a year now, but just recently decided to make an account. I have a pretty good view of the WTC outside my building, and since there are some people on here who might not live in the city, I thought I'd contribute to the thread in some way by sharing my view outside my building. Here's my own Carlos-style photo:

http://i.imgur.com/5Xuwj.jpg

Also, I'm an EMT with the New York City Fire Department, and a friend took this photo last year during the Towers of Light tribute that I thought you might like. I apologize if it doesn't really belong here, but I think you guys might get a kick out of it - I really like the way this photo turned out:

http://i.imgur.com/mLXBv.jpg

Thanks for reading.

uaarkson
May 31, 2012, 5:52 PM
:previous: Welcome, and thanks for the contributions.

yankeesfan1000
May 31, 2012, 5:59 PM
:previous: Welcome, and thanks for the contributions.

+1

Always nice to have someone new who's able to contribute photos!

NewYorkDominates
May 31, 2012, 6:28 PM
^ Amazing bro.Love the view.Welcome here and greatly appreciate the pics.

NYC GUY
May 31, 2012, 6:47 PM
So why do these columns look so different?

Roadcruiser1
May 31, 2012, 6:48 PM
So why do these columns look so different?

They are shorter than the other mechanical floor columns by 3'-5'. That is why it looks shorter.

MrSlippery519
May 31, 2012, 6:52 PM
They are shorter than the other mechanical floor columns by 3'-5'. That is why it looks shorter.

They are also not sitting directly over the other perimeter steel, take a close look they are offset and seem to be sitting inwards a few feet. These are totally different....waiting for someone like Otie to explain better

NYC GUY
May 31, 2012, 6:54 PM
^^^
I noticed that too.

CarlosV
May 31, 2012, 7:18 PM
...Here's my own Carlos-style photo:

Welcome and thank you for the shout out!!!!

let's see more pics from you!! :hi:

NOW this is fast work!!!!! all these work done basically today!!!! and glass panels up another floor!

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/7309929888_94836a9a39_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7309929888/)
DSC_0087 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7309929888/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

Dense_Electric
May 31, 2012, 7:34 PM
These beams wouldn't be part of that pseudo-hat truss, would they?

Zapatan
May 31, 2012, 7:43 PM
I think so, the corners are not much more than 10 feet away from touching.

sw5710
May 31, 2012, 8:03 PM
Floor 104 or the splices are 1,317'

CarlosV
May 31, 2012, 8:06 PM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8005/7310221580_3c71675dc5_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7310221580/)
DSC_0089 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7310221580/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

.

from 243 miles...taken 3/11/12 NASA
http://gothamist.com/attachments/arts_jen/onewtcnasa0412.jpg

QUEENSNYMAN
May 31, 2012, 8:31 PM
From: NYBOY75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgFeCEdZHvI&feature=youtu.be

Hope everyone enjoys!

eseninobrandon
May 31, 2012, 9:24 PM
From: NYBOY75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgFeCEdZHvI&feature=youtu.be

Hope everyone enjoys!

awwww yeah imagine how itll look like when finished :banana:

NYguy
May 31, 2012, 10:45 PM
jag9889 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jag9889/7310987940/sizes/z/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7097/7310987940_5c7c486299_z.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7097/7310987940_5c7c486299_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7104/7310989182_5ba417b6d7_b.jpg

QUEENSNYMAN
May 31, 2012, 11:14 PM
FROM: NYBOY75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gUpw8aJOgs&feature=youtu.be

tiarae
May 31, 2012, 11:24 PM
The new columns are for 103 mezzanine.

sw5710
May 31, 2012, 11:40 PM
Otie has a great diagram showing the top floors and the latest columns and why they are not the outer columns over on SSC. It would be cool to get that posted here.:yes:

Otie
Jun 1, 2012, 12:03 AM
Ok, the columns that went up today are non-structural and will support the louvered walls that span from the 103rd floor slab to just below the parapet, these walls serve for ventilation and will create an air plenum between these walls and the exterior facade.

Here louvered walls are in blue:
http://img864.imageshack.us/img864/3436/66782953.jpg

http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/8814/loverwalls.jpg


In case anyone didn't notice, this plenum will be exactly the same as the ones located between floors 91-93M and 3-6M.

JACKinBeantown
Jun 1, 2012, 12:35 AM
Welcome castellammare and thanks for the nice photos. Thanks also for saving people's lives.

Carlos, you're really making a name for yourself here, buddy!

TouchTheSky13
Jun 1, 2012, 1:13 AM
Does anyone think that it is rather odd and potentially problematic that there is going to be a hydrogen fuel cell plant located within 1 WTC's base? Hydrogen is an extremely flammable substance and is not easy to control. What if an explosion were to occur? Good move? Bad move?

Also, Otie, do you know what color that the new spire/antenna will be? I hope to God it's not the rust color that it was in the rendering Durst released...

uaarkson
Jun 1, 2012, 1:25 AM
:previous: This tower costs billions of dollars to ensure things like that will not happen.

TouchTheSky13
Jun 1, 2012, 1:34 AM
:previous: This tower costs billions of dollars to ensure things like that will not happen.

I only got two words - shit happens.

If they were going to put fuel cells somewhere in the building, I would think that the base would be the last place you'd want to put them. I could be mistaken, but I would think that an explosion in the base could cause massive damage to not only the base, but to the entire structure. I don't want to go so far as to say that such an explosion would compromise the building as a whole, but to me, that's just assonine. Why would you tamper with things that dangerous at the base of the most expensive building ever constructed?

chris123678
Jun 1, 2012, 1:46 AM
So If these aren't structual columns, then 1 wtc is still on floor 103.
And we are below 400 meters?

RockMont
Jun 1, 2012, 2:16 AM
I only got two words - shit happens.

If they were going to put fuel cells somewhere in the building, I would think that the base would be the last place you'd want to put them. I could be mistaken, but I would think that an explosion in the base could cause massive damage to not only the base, but to the entire structure. I don't want to go so far as to say that such an explosion would compromise the building as a whole, but to me, that's just assonine. Why would you tamper with things that dangerous at the base of the most expensive building ever constructed?

How about "Shit Happened"?

It's not going to happen again!

sw5710
Jun 1, 2012, 2:31 AM
So If these aren't structual columns, then 1 wtc is still on floor 103.
And we are below 400 meters?

We were at 1,297' to the splices then these columns went up. Even though these columns are not structual they still extend up a floor.

TouchTheSky13
Jun 1, 2012, 2:37 AM
How about "Shit Happened"?

It's not going to happen again!

I certainly hope not...But I'm not talking about a terrorist attack. I'm talking about the worst case scenario. In the documentary, The Rising, the chief securities engineer for 1 WTC said that the base is designed to resist car bombs from West St. yada yada yada. It sounds kind of counter-intuitive to pack a 200ft x 200ft safety feature with tons of explosive material...That's just what I think...

Roadcruiser1
Jun 1, 2012, 3:31 AM
I certainly hope not...But I'm not talking about a terrorist attack. I'm talking about the worst case scenario. In the documentary, The Rising, the chief securities engineer for 1 WTC said that the base is designed to resist car bombs from West St. yada yada yada. It sounds kind of counter-intuitive to pack a 200ft x 200ft safety feature with tons of explosive material...That's just what I think...

Who told you that? That is a total lie. One World Trade Center is completely powered, heated, and cooled by steam, and steam is made by something like coal, or another fuel source burning. Obliviously hydrogen will not be used. The original World Trade Center if I am correct was powered by oil. They didn't use natural gas because of flammability.

Duck From NY
Jun 1, 2012, 3:54 AM
How about "Shit Happened"?

It's not going to happen again!

I think he's asking a fair question. I understand the desire for more "green" architecture. I even understand it as a PR move. Nonetheless, for such a costly building (as well as a terrorist target) to have massive hydrogen fuel cells (as claimed)... well, it raises an eyebrow; so his concern is legitimate IMO. Not saying they haven't got it covered, but I'd like to hear the engineers working on the project explain how they are protecting the cells from exposure or error.

1Boston
Jun 1, 2012, 4:30 AM
Durst didn't ruin the the design.
Most of the changes they did, with the exception of the spire was for the better of the building.

I was only talking about the spire, which completely affects the rest of the tower. I agree that the tower is beautiful, just not the antenna that will make the beauty of this building harder to see.

Otie
Jun 1, 2012, 5:33 AM
There is indeed a fuel cell co-generation plant inside this tower, it is located on the mechanical space above the lobby and will generate 1.2MW using natural gas.

mrnyc
Jun 1, 2012, 9:22 AM
hello everyone --

winding down, but its time once again for the monthly first of the month progress check:

what floor are we on as of today?

is it 103? between 103-4?

as always, thanks if you know or would like to guess!

QUEENSNYMAN
Jun 1, 2012, 9:49 AM
FROM: NYMAN2010

Yesterday from "The Rock"

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51949497@N08/7313402124/in/photostream

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51949497@N08/7313401884/in/photostream

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51949497@N08/7313401754/in/photostream

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51949497@N08/7313400410/in/photostream

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51949497@N08/7313400690/in/photostream

Hope you like!

alan88
Jun 1, 2012, 12:21 PM
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1
Who told you that? That is a total lie. One World Trade Center is completely powered, heated, and cooled by steam, and steam is made by something like coal, or another fuel source burning. Obliviously hydrogen will not be used. The original World Trade Center if I am correct was powered by oil. They didn't use natural gas because of flammability.

What are you talking about? The original WTC had electric drive chillers, 7 - 7000 ton + 2 - 2500 ton + 5 2000 ton units added after 1993. The power came from Con Ed grid and it could have been generated by oil, gas, nuclear or hydro. The end user doesn't know. It used steam for heating in winter and the only oil was for emergency generators.

The new tower has electric driven DX cooling units on each tenant floor, steam for heating, and natural gas for fuel cell and tenant cafeteria's

alan

NYguy
Jun 1, 2012, 12:51 PM
Nrbelex (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrbelex/7312294832/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8024/7312294832_22fbd6d019_b.jpg



beanhead4529 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/8379824@N07/7312693158/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8016/7312693158_09fd4069a5_b.jpg



cosmicautumn (http://www.flickr.com/photos/astrozombie/7306174588/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7306174588_db96e245fe_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7087/7306180582_514348d7a7_b.jpg

castellammare
Jun 1, 2012, 3:35 PM
Hi everybody, and thanks for the great welcome yesterday. Here's a photo of the WTC that I just took (not too much of a change from yesterday though):

http://i.imgur.com/8Fqvt.jpg

While I was going through some old photos, I found this one I took of the WTC sometime last year:

http://i.imgur.com/PJwWa.jpg

Have a good day everyone.

PZelda
Jun 1, 2012, 4:03 PM
That pic from last year - awwwww! 1 WTC was so little then... :D

CarlosV
Jun 1, 2012, 5:35 PM
from 7:28 am june 1, 2012, taken by Anthony who works at the site.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7212/7315536608_45db98d453_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315536608/)
photo (17) copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315536608/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

.

Carlos' Cam

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7089/7315536146_314611eaa7_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315536146/)
DSC_0090 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315536146/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8004/7315978908_bd4ebe57c6_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315978908/)
DSC_0091 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7315978908/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

O-tacular
Jun 1, 2012, 5:42 PM
I'm attempting to stay positive and believe that cooler heads will prevail and that Childs finds a suitable replacement for the radome, but I'm not sure. This building seems to be one big compromise.

QUEENSNYMAN
Jun 1, 2012, 7:35 PM
FROM: NYBOY75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwYC6RHTHyA&feature=youtu.be

Have a great weekend everybody!!!

hunser
Jun 1, 2012, 7:53 PM
http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/freedom_tower_26204.aspx

*The following information was last updated on June 1, 2012.

Tower steel is now above floor 103. It is expected to top out at 1368 feet) in late spring/early summer 2012.
Facade installation is now above floor 75
Concrete is now being installed above floor 93
Installation of the 408-foot-tall telecommunications spire in summer 2012 (bringing total tower height to 1776 feet)
Spray-on fireproofing underway
Elevator shaft fit-out
Multiple cranes on site for steel and concrete installation
Both the south and north cores are now being erected as the structure rises
"Cocoon" safety system now in place around upper perimeter, to rise with structure
Utility installation and tie-ins
Crews are coordinating substructure construction while maintaining PATH service

sw5710
Jun 1, 2012, 7:53 PM
Great shots Carlos!
We are on floor 104 not 103M "Is that correct"
As for the spire/antenna. It is the CTBUH that will dictate the final height in the end. The same way they do on every building standing today. I am going to wait and see if some other outer cladding might be used since we are still quite a while before construction is ready for it to be mounted.

NYguy
Jun 1, 2012, 8:13 PM
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/obama_to_visit_one_world_trade_center_chhfvr5PoHhzARmVUgbv4H

Obama to visit One World Trade Center construction

June 1, 2012


President Obama will visit the former site of the World Trade Center this month to view the progress of
One World Trade Center, the growing skyscraper that became the tallest building in New York City this spring.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest briefed reporters Friday about the visit, which is scheduled for Flag Day, June 14,
according to FOX News Channel. Earnest told reporters Obama's visit will be a preview of the skyscraper's
"topping-out ceremony," a traditional event held to commemorate the completion of a building's structure.




Patrick Rasenberg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314732258/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7072/7314732258_ccbb1212c0_h.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7088/7314737484_9253de7fc1_h.jpg

jd3189
Jun 1, 2012, 8:18 PM
:previous: Well, look at that. Maybe Obama will get news of the greedy move done by Durst and the PA to 1 WTC's spire and make sure the rest of the nation knows that the "rebirth" project is being exploited by dumb developers. Just something I would like happen.:notacrook:

hunser
Jun 1, 2012, 8:34 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7100/7314740318_68775f1645_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314740318/)
Skyline Manhattan (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314740318/) von Patrick Rasenberg (http://www.flickr.com/people/prasenberg/) auf Flickr


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8001/7314763682_b4db4517b0_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314763682/)
WTC (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314763682/) von Patrick Rasenberg (http://www.flickr.com/people/prasenberg/) auf Flickr


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7079/7314754542_787b0e57d9_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314754542/)
WTC 1 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasenberg/7314754542/) von Patrick Rasenberg (http://www.flickr.com/people/prasenberg/) auf Flickr

YankeesfaninUT
Jun 1, 2012, 10:18 PM
I sent numerous emails out a few weeks ago about the spire. I received one back from Jordan Barowitz of the Durst Organization. The reason for removing the radome was because it is logistically impossible to maintain it that far in the sky. Free climbers would have to scale the spire and attach the cables to a ring at the top. Then they would have to hoist a 40’ x 10’, 2000lbs piece of fiberglass up to the top and install it. Both of these violate New York City Department of Buildings hoisting regulations and is also a threat to public safety. They discussed this back in January. The architects had time to come up with a redesign but chose not to. So no one should be angry at Durst for this. They gave them the chance to come up with a redesign. After the new renderings came out I think it really wont be that bad. All of the buildings are very beautiful. This will be a very beautiful complex when it's done.

donoman100
Jun 1, 2012, 11:09 PM
How are the spires on all of the other buildings in Manhattan maintained?

applejacks
Jun 1, 2012, 11:12 PM
While it was nice of him to reply, I call BS on the explanation.

I sent numerous emails out a few weeks ago about the spire. I received one back from Jordan Barowitz of the Durst Organization. The reason for removing the radome was because it is logistically impossible to maintain it that far in the sky. Free climbers would have to scale the spire and attach the cables to a ring at the top. Then they would have to hoist a 40’ x 10’, 2000lbs piece of fiberglass up to the top and install it. Both of these violate New York City Department of Buildings hoisting regulations and is also a threat to public safety. They discussed this back in January. The architects had time to come up with a redesign but chose not to. So no one should be angry at Durst for this. They gave them the chance to come up with a redesign. After the new renderings came out I think it really wont be that bad. All of the buildings are very beautiful. This will be a very beautiful complex when it's done.

jd3189
Jun 1, 2012, 11:30 PM
I sent numerous emails out a few weeks ago about the spire. I received one back from Jordan Barowitz of the Durst Organization. The reason for removing the radome was because it is logistically impossible to maintain it that far in the sky. Free climbers would have to scale the spire and attach the cables to a ring at the top. Then they would have to hoist a 40’ x 10’, 2000lbs piece of fiberglass up to the top and install it. Both of these violate New York City Department of Buildings hoisting regulations and is also a threat to public safety. They discussed this back in January. The architects had time to come up with a redesign but chose not to. So no one should be angry at Durst for this. They gave them the chance to come up with a redesign. After the new renderings came out I think it really wont be that bad. All of the buildings are very beautiful. This will be a very beautiful complex when it's done.

They just now realized this? Now I can't trust anyone with 1 WTC. Silverstein should have just taken control of the whole site if this was going to be the type of bullcrap we were going to face.

natiboy
Jun 1, 2012, 11:48 PM
Don't they just have to put the radome up once. Why would free climbers have to climb the spire on a regular basis to replace 40x10 ft. sections?

pnapp1
Jun 2, 2012, 1:11 AM
Today: WTC Progress Facebook:

http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/457836_325404977536747_821620111_o.jpg


http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/460440_325405570870021_1479228400_o.jpg
http://www.facebook.com/wtcprogress

NYC GUY
Jun 2, 2012, 1:24 AM
They just now realized this? Now I can't trust anyone with 1 WTC. Silverstein should have just taken control of the whole site if this was going to be the type of bullcrap we were going to face.

That's what I said! When I heard they changed the spire I was thinking so this building has been designed since 2006 and just now they are realizing that it can't be maintained! Since President Obama's coming if David Child's is smart he will be there and meet with the president and discuss the spire design change.

Duck From NY
Jun 2, 2012, 1:56 AM
:previous: Well, look at that. Maybe Obama will get news of the greedy move done by Durst and the PA to 1 WTC's spire and make sure the rest of the nation knows that the "rebirth" project is being exploited by dumb developers. Just something I would like happen.:notacrook:

Has the WTC received federal funds? If so, does the president have the legal right to do anything more than make a personal request?

jd3189
Jun 2, 2012, 2:11 AM
Has the WTC received federal funds? If so, does the president have the legal right to do anything more than make a personal request?

The PA, although it's more private in practice, is still a public agency between NY and NJ and it receives funds from tolls around the tri-state area. If Obama makes a speech that will bring more awareness of the spire fiasco in 1 WTC, there may be a good chance that Durst will rethink on their decision.

Duck From NY
Jun 2, 2012, 2:42 AM
The PA, although it's more private in practice, is still a public agency between NY and NJ and it receives funds from tolls around the tri-state area. If Obama makes a speech that will bring more awareness of the spire fiasco in 1 WTC, there may be a good chance that Durst will rethink on their decision.

Eh, unless the Feds have some say in this, it would sound like an abuse of power. I think a personal call might be more effective anyway. Besides, the guy is running for reelection, the last thing he needs (and I'm not saying this as a supporter) is to make a speech about this just to have the PA or Durst ignore him.

chris123678
Jun 2, 2012, 2:48 AM
So are those tiny winy columns part of the structure?
When will the real perimeter steel be placed in.