PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 [286] 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361

tdawg
Dec 16, 2012, 1:52 PM
A good friend of mine is the Asst Director of Communications for the Port Authority and I saw him at a Christmas party last night. He told me the spire should be complete by the end of January.

2-TOWERS
Dec 16, 2012, 4:21 PM
Well there was never any doubt that the North Tower's mast was an antenna. It was littered with broadcasting equipment. That's one of the main dfferences with the new 1 WTC's mast. It wont have anything attached to it, that's what the comms ring will be for.

this was a nice antenna......aka the rocket

alon504
Dec 16, 2012, 5:03 PM
Cool pics...

Hudson11
Dec 16, 2012, 5:28 PM
I invite you to read more carefully, the mast was designed specifically for holding broadcast equipment at the upper sections, it WILL eventually look worse than the original mast.


I guess I need to come here more often :shrug:

Yankee fan for life
Dec 16, 2012, 5:54 PM
I guess I need to come here more often :shrug:
:previous:

1 wtc mast is basically going to resemble Conde Nast antenna but it wont looks as bad as Conde Nast.

NYguy
Dec 16, 2012, 6:21 PM
As long as I can see it and it is connected to the building, it counts towards overall height. I consider the antenna on top of the ESB to be its peak, as well as the two masts that make up the "hat" of the Sears Tower. Of course, the spire was symbolic for 1 WTC, but as long as the internal mast goes up to the same height, I'm happy. I could care less what the CTBUH thinks. Whatever a person thinks is how tall a building is should not be decided by another group of people.

You know, this reminds of those people who, regardless of whoever wins elections declares "well, he's not my president!" You don't have to like it, but it's a little disconnected with reality. As I mentioned to someone earlier, ignoring facts don't make them not so. We live in a world where sometimes things get decided by other people, whether we agree with those people or not. That's why there are laws, rules, and codes. Somebody has to decide what's what. It's not left to each individual's interpretation, no matter how much some may wish it so. And it just so happens that there is a body who gets to decide on such things as spires and antennas, and overall heights of skyscrapers.

Now, this discussion about the antenna is not simply about whether it should be counted as a spire, but appearance as well. From everything I've seen so far, it's going to be built and function exactly as they say it will. Which will be a disgustingly awful afterthought for New York's most significant skyscraper to date, one that should be left out of the discussion of the tower's design. Of course, there will always be the apathetic, and there will always be people who don't like the tower regardless of whatever is built on top. Just as there may be some who genuinely prefer the look of the antenna. And as we've even seen with the City Planning agency, it's possible to absolutely love a design, and not be too thrilled with the top, or any other aspect of it.


http://www.anotherpartofme.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/1wtc_redesign_antenna2.jpg
http://www.anotherpartofme.com/1-world-trade-centers-spire-becomes-antenna-in-redesign/



DDanzig (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ddanzig/8276103276/sizes/z/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8208/8276103276_00b4426e54_z.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8208/8276103276_00b4426e54_b.jpg

IntoTheLens827
Dec 16, 2012, 7:31 PM
'

kznyc2k
Dec 16, 2012, 8:35 PM
2012.12.14

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8073/8279014814_ec4fbd8552_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8069/8279014146_1dd50a0d69_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8358/8277955297_b15d3d0c86_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8344/8279010296_f038d77294_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8224/8277951827_05e5cba638_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8058/8277948113_cfca77a8ce_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8084/8279003520_2a7b7c4a47_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8057/8277945291_e552d221f8_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8344/8277943437_0d7f33128a_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8215/8278999486_a7420a602f_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8481/8278997028_4e3f3c921a_b.jpg

CoolCzech
Dec 16, 2012, 8:59 PM
"Somebody has to decide what's what. It's not left to each individual's interpretation, no matter how much some may wish it so. And it just so happens that there is a body who gets to decide on such things as spires and antennas, and overall heights of skyscrapers."

Well... not to put too fine a point on it, but who died and made the CTBUH king?

Are they officially chartered? By who, the Congress? The UN?

They may be pretend to be "official," but they have no more official standing than a local boy scout troop to pronounce on anything.

sbarn
Dec 16, 2012, 9:15 PM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8359/8275055103_c3402db160_h.jpg
Sunpanther's photostream (http://www.flickr.com/photos/7320137@N08/8275055103/)

sw5710
Dec 16, 2012, 9:30 PM
CTBUH started in 1968/1969

JayPro
Dec 16, 2012, 10:40 PM
"Somebody has to decide what's what. It's not left to each individual's interpretation, no matter how much some may wish it so. And it just so happens that there is a body who gets to decide on such things as spires and antennas, and overall heights of skyscrapers."

Well... not to put too fine a point on it, but who died and made the CTBUH king?

Are they officially chartered? By who, the Congress? The UN?

They may be pretend to be "official," but they have no more official standing than a local boy scout troop to pronounce on anything.


^^This.^^

Honestly, the more I see the updated version of the top as a whole and how it IMO creates a better sense of visual continuity eith the building than the version most of us (myself included) had hoped for, the more easily I can get acclimated to it, if not be in love with it.

But I agree with CoolCzech here. I think with all due respect that the CTBUH is being given *way* more credibility as some kind of official architectural think-tank than it deserves to have.

After all, the literal boatloads and planeloads of tourists from all over isn't going to understand or care about a self-anointed group whose every edict and proclamation gets shat on by niche-interest folks like us. They're just gonna see a *huge* skyscraper with a *414'* pinnacle...hopefully alongside 3 equally enormous highrises by 2015.

599GTO
Dec 16, 2012, 10:49 PM
A good friend of mine is the Asst Director of Communications for the Port Authority and I saw him at a Christmas party last night. He told me the spire should be complete by the end of January.

Antenna.

Yankee fan for life
Dec 16, 2012, 11:03 PM
Antenna.

:previous:

Antenna/mast to be more exact .

NewYorkDominates
Dec 17, 2012, 1:24 AM
Over at WiredNY:Derek2k3

Shaun Jones LA
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8350/8217252305_56a285748c_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8350/8218963802_89d3b9c897_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaunjones/

bigreach
Dec 17, 2012, 4:30 AM
Durst has to be taking heat from 95% of the population,,,how can he live with himself?

gramsjdg
Dec 17, 2012, 5:21 AM
You can certainly ignore the CTBUH if you so desire, but it does not change the fact that the antenna mast as it is to be now is neither a structural or architectural component of the building as designed, and there is nothing that any of you can do to change that. It would be the same exact thing as saying that the original WTC-1 was actually 1729 ft tall and not 1368 ft tall. Deal with it.

Duck From NY
Dec 17, 2012, 7:45 AM
You can certainly ignore the CTBUH if you so desire, but it does not change the fact that the antenna mast as it is to be now is neither a structural or architectural component of the building as designed, and there is nothing that any of you can do to change that. It would be the same exact thing as saying that the original WTC-1 was actually 1729 ft tall and not 1368 ft tall. Deal with it.

I don't see how anyone can call it a spire. Even if for some technical reason it is, we all know it looks like an antenna and nothing else.

hunser
Dec 17, 2012, 11:01 AM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaunjones/

Nice stuff...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8083/8256086730_be96afd987_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaunjones/8256086730/)
Graffiti 2 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaunjones/8256086730/) von Shaun Jones LA (http://www.flickr.com/people/shaunjones/) auf Flickr

Towersteve
Dec 17, 2012, 3:28 PM
You can certainly ignore the CTBUH if you so desire, but it does not change the fact that the antenna mast as it is to be now is neither a structural or architectural component of the building as designed, and there is nothing that any of you can do to change that. It would be the same exact thing as saying that the original WTC-1 was actually 1729 ft tall and not 1368 ft tall. Deal with it.

cosign. I also think the criticism of councils legitamcy is misplaced. This is Durst's fault for changing the spire to the antenna.

goldcntry
Dec 17, 2012, 4:05 PM
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us) http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/661/img1910jd.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/233/img1910jd.jpg/)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

Should we be concerned that there is already rust forming on the spire components?

*sigh*

islandxtreme26
Dec 17, 2012, 4:19 PM
Hey all, pretty sure this is the first time I'm contributing pictures here...all taken this weekend and also available on my Flickr @chrisswann26 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/sets/72157632269264248/with/8280136721/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8204/8280136721_2469541642_c.jpg
1WTC and the Tridents in the Museum Pavilion (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8280136721/in/set-72157632269264248)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8064/8280447723_7c578f5fe8_c.jpg
1 World Trade Center Southeast Corner of Podium (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8280447723/in/set-72157632269264248)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8219/8281193404_cf88e054c4_c.jpg
Looking Up From the Base of 1 World Trade Center (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8281193404/in/set-72157632269264248)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8206/8281188752_b84458f36b_c.jpg
"The Sphere" in Battery Park and 1WTC (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8281188752/in/set-72157632269264248)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8205/8280152615_9e881400f6_c.jpg
A Section of the 1WTC Spire Being Hoisted Up to the Top (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8280152615/in/set-72157632269264248)

Guiltyspark
Dec 17, 2012, 6:02 PM
Should we be concerned that there is already rust forming on the spire components?

*sigh*

I am. Is there a plan for the mast (not spire) to be coated/painted in order to protect it from rusting?

06hdfxdwg
Dec 17, 2012, 7:01 PM
No need to worry about that rust on those flanges. It's just surface rust and can be wire wheeled off very quickly and easily. In fact,it's so miniscule it wont even have to be wire wheeled off. All they should have to do is perhaps coat both flanges with some copper anti-seize compound,bolt them together and it'll be good to go. Then perhaps some primer and a good coat of paint and it'll be fine. I guess if they really wanted to,they could even throw a bead of 6010 weld around inside and outside of the flange as well if there's no gasket between the mounting surfaces.

uaarkson
Dec 17, 2012, 7:10 PM
I am. Is there a plan for the mast (not spire) to be coated/painted in order to protect it from rusting?

I think they know what they're doing.

Dense_Electric
Dec 17, 2012, 7:12 PM
Antenna.

You can certainly ignore the CTBUH if you so desire, but it does not change the fact that the antenna mast as it is to be now is neither a structural or architectural component of the building as designed, and there is nothing that any of you can do to change that. It would be the same exact thing as saying that the original WTC-1 was actually 1729 ft tall and not 1368 ft tall. Deal with it.

Yeah, see, that's the kind of stuff I'm talking about. Your opinion does not override CTBUH's ruling. It's true that CTBUH isn't "official" by any means, and you're free to ignore or accept their ruling as you wish, but they're the defacto authority on structure height, and most people (including architects, engineers, structure owners, governments, and structure databases such as skyscraperpage.com) go by what they say. In the same way that they don't get to decide these things for you, you don't get to decide these things for everyone else.

NYC GUY
Dec 17, 2012, 7:35 PM
Well I don't think they really matter I don't think there is an official ruling cause when I went to the ESB observatory there was a sign saying 1450 feet tall.

Monsanto21
Dec 17, 2012, 8:05 PM
Lots of action for the radome!

http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc478/ebay849/wtc/wtc_zps430c144b.png

From 12/17/12
http://www.video-monitoring.com/construction/kpitv/index.htm

NYguy
Dec 17, 2012, 9:08 PM
Well... not to put too fine a point on it, but who died and made the CTBUH king?
They may be pretend to be "official," but they have no more official standing than a local boy scout troop to pronounce on anything.

In fact, they do. Let's not be silly. Just because you choose to move yourself outside of reality doesn't change it.



Over at WiredNY:

Shaun Jones LA
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8350/8217252305_56a285748c_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaunjones/

Great shot.



Wallace Flores (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallaceflores/8280371847/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8084/8280371847_981348dd0f_b.jpg



etravus (http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalcraftsman/8275745047/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8204/8275745047_1abefcb360_b.jpg



barsen (http://www.flickr.com/photos/barsen/8280166601/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8063/8280166601_a82f1aefa1_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8063/8280166601_7b8cc26cc3_h.jpg



chrisswann26 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8280136369/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8065/8280136369_680c3e5634_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8065/8280136369_0dcc5df0d1_h.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8212/8280147801_3d55eb3636_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8348/8281204856_f2c13844ab_b.jpg

NewYorkDominates
Dec 17, 2012, 9:39 PM
The base looks very complex,seems like they are making thrusters for a rocket.:)

Justin Ackerman
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8069/8279130639_32c3ee428d_h.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8490/8281413666_cf20221953_h.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/justin_ackerman/

bayrider
Dec 17, 2012, 9:55 PM
Found this picture on Reddit by jacknappier

"Escalator of the new World Trade Center, at the 101ST floor!"
http://i.imgur.com/V2RNx.jpg

NYC=WTC
Dec 17, 2012, 11:53 PM
Anybody know what date base cladding begins this month?

mheadroom
Dec 18, 2012, 12:15 AM
Anybody know what date base cladding begins this month?

Pretty sure it's already started. Look at the base pictures above. Top row is in.

chris123678
Dec 18, 2012, 12:29 AM
Lots of action for the radome!

http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc478/ebay849/wtc/wtc_zps430c144b.png

From 12/17/12
http://www.video-monitoring.com/construction/kpitv/index.htm

What radome? That was eliminated.

chris123678
Dec 18, 2012, 12:31 AM
Pretty sure it's already started. Look at the base pictures above. Top row is in.

I'm pretty sure that it has to be squared off yet and it looks like that may have started.

NYC=WTC
Dec 18, 2012, 12:36 AM
Did not ever think that the base would take what seems like the longest to finish. :rolleyes:

-Filipe-
Dec 18, 2012, 12:53 AM
im probally wrong, but did they square off the base already? those beams that go across the base, look like they meet at a square on the sides, anyone else know what i mean? lol

mheadroom
Dec 18, 2012, 1:16 AM
im probally wrong, but did they square off the base already? those beams that go across the base, look like they meet at a square on the sides, anyone else know what i mean? lol

The base looks squared off to me!

And I like the way they did it because it seems easy enough to undo if our descendants ever figure out a safer prismatic glass design that will restore the chamfered base.

mheadroom
Dec 18, 2012, 1:16 AM
http://imgur.com/wSmqF.jpg

Foggy night erased 1WTC from the promenade.

NYC=WTC
Dec 18, 2012, 1:22 AM
He probably meant to say antennae and yes the radome was eliminated.

NYC=WTC
Dec 18, 2012, 1:25 AM
The base looks squared off to me!

And I like the way they did it because it seems easy enough to undo if our descendants ever figure out a safer prismatic glass design that will restore the chamfered base.


Don't think durst will undo the finished product. That will cost extra $$$ to do. Live with the antennae and the base.

ThatOneGuy
Dec 18, 2012, 1:33 AM
^^ It's not just that, it's pointless, too.

LA Kurt
Dec 18, 2012, 2:06 AM
The top of a finished building; the final floor or parapet should be what determines the height. The antennas and spires are not building height. There.

Roadcruiser1
Dec 18, 2012, 2:08 AM
im probally wrong, but did they square off the base already? those beams that go across the base, look like they meet at a square on the sides, anyone else know what i mean? lol

Not yet. Right now they are fireproofing the base instead.

NewYorkDominates
Dec 18, 2012, 2:20 AM
Blade Runner!

Rick Bebbington
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8337/8278604378_b34a1b08b9_b.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8277544855_0babf3f72a_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rickbebbington/

LA Kurt
Dec 18, 2012, 2:23 AM
I see no base cladding started.

ihl
Dec 18, 2012, 2:26 AM
Durst has to be taking heat from 95% of the population,,,how can he live with himself?

You guys crack me up, nobody cares but about 8 people on this forum. Maybe if you offer to pay a bazillion dollars for a different one he'll change his mind.

PMadFlyer
Dec 18, 2012, 3:25 AM
chrisswann26 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28612242@N08/8280136369/sizes/l/in/photostream/)


http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8065/8280136369_0dcc5df0d1_h.jpg
]

I spy with my little eye, the first line of back panels immediately below the 20th floor. charcoal colored panels at top of corner uninterrupted by the steel columns and capped with a new line of reflective metal below the original stainless steel that is part of the 20th floor window panels.

Kevin Scott Koepke
Dec 18, 2012, 3:36 AM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8481/8283350046_ac80467895_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/plasticfantasticphotography/8283350046/)
One World Trade Center (http://www.flickr.com/photos/plasticfantasticphotography/8283350046/) by kevin scott koepke photography (http://www.flickr.com/people/plasticfantasticphotography/), on Flickr

mheadroom
Dec 18, 2012, 3:47 AM
Don't think durst will undo the finished product. That will cost extra $$$ to do. Live with the antennae and the base.

If it wasn't clear, I'll clear it up - I don't expect anything to change with the base as long as Durst has anything to do with it. I was wildly speculating about a far off future when the glass panels need to be replaced because they look shitty and dated and people with taste and money decide to modernize the look of the building by restoring the base to the original design.

Before you say that's stupid or pointless, it's been done. Look at any number of renovations to the mid-century midtown office buildings. The lobby of the GM building comes to mind (although that wasn't a popular update, I personally enjoy walking through the lobby every day).

Not saying it will happen. I'm just saying that I appreciate that the redesign doesn't require a substantial alternation to the original structure and therefore makes it easier to imagine a future update or renovation.

NYC=WTC
Dec 18, 2012, 4:06 AM
Not yet. Right now they are fireproofing the base instead.

They took it to another level with the safety for 1wtc. 1wtc will be the most safest office building ever built. Tenants will be lining up for Silverstein once they see what was accomplished with 1wtc. :)

WorldTradeCenter
Dec 18, 2012, 4:37 AM
I don't know about you guys, but I really like the new base design, especially that it's squared off.

chris123678
Dec 18, 2012, 4:39 AM
Not yet. Right now they are fireproofing the base instead.

Actually they did square off the top portion of the base. I was just informed that by Otie and some others who've posted pictures at SSC

Nexis4Jersey
Dec 18, 2012, 5:59 AM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8219/8283635248_8c2ef313c1_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42178139@N06/8283635248/)
World Trade Center 1 with Holiday lighting (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42178139@N06/8283635248/) by Nexis4Jersey09 (http://www.flickr.com/people/42178139@N06/), on Flickr

sw5710
Dec 18, 2012, 6:05 AM
I spy with my little eye, the first line of back panels immediately below the 20th floor. charcoal colored panels at top of corner uninterrupted by the steel columns and capped with a new line of reflective metal below the original stainless steel that is part of the 20th floor window panels.

Great angle. Love this one. Does anyone know if the 2nd section of mast to go up will bring the mast to the top of the parapet.

YankeesfaninUT
Dec 18, 2012, 8:15 AM
Great angle. Love this one. Does anyone know if the 2nd section of mast to go up will bring the mast to the top of the parapet.

If the 2nd spire section is the same height as the 1st section which was 16 feet it will be 1 foot 4 inches short of the top of the parapet.

Savitar
Dec 18, 2012, 11:07 AM
If it wasn't clear, I'll clear it up - I don't expect anything to change with the base as long as Durst has anything to do with it. I was wildly speculating about a far off future when the glass panels need to be replaced because they look shitty and dated and people with taste and money decide to modernize the look of the building by restoring the base to the original design.

Before you say that's stupid or pointless, it's been done. Look at any number of renovations to the mid-century midtown office buildings. The lobby of the GM building comes to mind (although that wasn't a popular update, I personally enjoy walking through the lobby every day).

Not saying it will happen. I'm just saying that I appreciate that the redesign doesn't require a substantial alternation to the original structure and therefore makes it easier to imagine a future update or renovation.

If there had been an internet 40 years ago we would have been equally outraged at the piddly little thing that was originally put on top of the North Tower. That didn't last forever and this little needle dick thing might not either!

whiteford
Dec 18, 2012, 1:19 PM
just as fine as anything in china. only dubai has a finer tower. this is one hell of a skyscraper guys, you all are very, very blessed.

mheadroom
Dec 18, 2012, 2:09 PM
If there had been an internet 40 years ago we would have been equally outraged at the piddly little thing that was originally put on top of the North Tower. That didn't last forever and this little needle dick thing might not either!

The antenna on the north tower was never designed to be enclosed with a sculptural spire. It's not about the girth bro. It's about the integrity of the design. People are upset because the design of this world class tower is being systematically undermined by office-park caliber modifications not because the "antenna's too thin!"

And to head off the broken records, no I don't think my posting this on a skyscraper enthusiasts' forum is going to change anything. I've accepted it etc etc. Yes I'm stupid and pointless. I should love everything the Port Authority gives me (including 9 dollar tolls).

sbarn
Dec 18, 2012, 2:36 PM
WTC with bonus Whitney shot!

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8060/8272338235_8ece5a92f7_h.jpg
taigatrommelchen (http://www.flickr.com/photos/taigatrommelchen/8272338235/)

hunser
Dec 18, 2012, 3:15 PM
A month old but love the color here...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8067/8282769577_e522a7ce4e_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmarella/8282769577/)
lower Manhattan (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmarella/8282769577/) von pmarella (http://www.flickr.com/people/pmarella/) auf Flickr

NewYorkDominates
Dec 18, 2012, 5:12 PM
^ I love it.

New York City,back on top.

Pippigirl
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8244369387_c4459979eb_h.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8210/8252453067_7dc9fc404a_h.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/88206144@N07/

Silverfox
Dec 18, 2012, 8:26 PM
just as fine as anything in china. only dubai has a finer tower. this is one hell of a skyscraper guys, you all are very, very blessed.

For what it's worth, One WTC is more functionally advanced than the Burj, or any other current skyscraper.

NYguy
Dec 18, 2012, 8:32 PM
TKE_Americas (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tke_americas/8285347146/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8486/8285347146_ae7e08b047_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8218/8285346826_b217f49d65_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8503/8284287933_3a0742a6f0_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8500/8285347750_d6e32b4d30_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8284288435_1167523f8d_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8083/8285344334_5bd2a36145_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8219/8285341824_88d09c6bb2_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8284284113_09e37aab16_b.jpg

sterlippo1
Dec 18, 2012, 8:40 PM
^^^ absolutely amazing set there. I got sick looking at the guy standing right next to the edge of the tower:runaway:

eleven=11
Dec 18, 2012, 8:57 PM
what floors does the stairs connect??

PhillyToNYC
Dec 18, 2012, 9:16 PM
what floors does the stairs connect??

Probably the Observation deck floors.

NYC GUY
Dec 18, 2012, 9:20 PM
Did they begin installing the antenna/spire today?

deepen915
Dec 19, 2012, 1:03 AM
^ I love it.

New York City,back on top.

Pippigirl
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8244369387_c4459979eb_h.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/88206144@N07/

beautiful shot!!

eleven=11
Dec 19, 2012, 1:48 AM
Probably the Observation deck floors.

is there a new floor plan for this deck?
didnt they pick a burger joint ??

Empire state of mind
Dec 19, 2012, 2:47 AM
Love that shot!!!!!!

rockinrolla
Dec 19, 2012, 2:58 AM
Pippigirl
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8244369387_c4459979eb_h.jpg

1 wtc looks short from this angle but love this shot!

kpdrummer82
Dec 19, 2012, 3:47 AM
^^ They bring up a great point, what is the status on the Observation deck, did the restaurant get the thumbs up or what? Personally, I'd like there to be like a Burger King or Wendy's up there, that'd be awesome, fast food with a view. Damn right lol

CCs77
Dec 19, 2012, 4:11 AM
Spectacular pictures of the scalator being lifted NYGuy

two more
Would somebody want to go ON the scalator on its way up?
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8482/8284284977_e35643bfb2_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tke_americas/8284284977/)
ThyssenKrupp Elevator - One World Trade Center Escalator Hoisting (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tke_americas/8284284977/) por TKE_Americas (http://www.flickr.com/people/tke_americas/), en Flickr

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8222/8285345130_e22d682a6a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tke_americas/8285345130/)
ThyssenKrupp Elevator - One World Trade Center Escalator Hoisting (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tke_americas/8285345130/) por TKE_Americas (http://www.flickr.com/people/tke_americas/), en Flickr

NewYorkDominates
Dec 19, 2012, 5:45 AM
I believe Shake Shack was still in the competition,so hopefully eating better burgers would make the views even better.

AliFulstow
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8340/8284569855_75b0f9c6a2_h.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/alifulstowphotography/8284569855/

RealTimJones
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8212/8285335370_61fab28a7d_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tim_jones/8285335370/sizes/l/in/photostream/

NYonAir
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/227065_308275539291502_1379218562_n.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/libertyhelicoptercharter

NYC=WTC
Dec 19, 2012, 3:42 PM
They are taking down all of the black safety netting on the south end of the base, so I assume base cladding is about to start in full force. :)

NYguy
Dec 19, 2012, 6:39 PM
NYonAir
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/227065_308275539291502_1379218562_n.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/libertyhelicoptercharter


I want this shot, poster sized!



howeirdd (http://www.flickr.com/photos/howeirdd/8286733058/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8204/8286733058_59c435a9c5_b.jpg



danielfoster437 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielfoster/8288226908/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8343/8288226908_740746abe6_b.jpg

NewYorkDominates
Dec 19, 2012, 7:58 PM
I want this one megasized...

NYonAir
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/481566_10151208138197428_953179145_n.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151208138197428&set=a.144473807427.116133.144228292427&type=1&theater

NYguy
Dec 19, 2012, 8:20 PM
^ That will almost be the view from the Nordstrom tower.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/one-world-trade-center-escalator_n_2323388.html?utm_hp_ref=new-york

One World Trade Center Escalator Installation Shows Spectacular Feat Of Engineering

12/18/2012

Workers reportedly installed an escalator on the 101st floor of One World Trade Center. A photographer captured the escalator dangling high above Lower Manhattan, as workers lifted it with a crane mounted on top of the building. The image, posted by Reddit user jacknappier, shows a spectacular feat of engineering, and provides a dizzying dose of vertigo.

One World Trade Center is already the tallest building in NYC.

The escalator photo comes less than a week after the first section of a 408-foot spire was hoisted atop the building.


(Photos posted above)

Kiyardo
Dec 19, 2012, 8:55 PM
Stairway to Heaven

Eidolon
Dec 19, 2012, 9:08 PM
Pippigirl
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8244369387_c4459979eb_h.jpg


That is a fantastic picture! :cool:

xnyr
Dec 19, 2012, 9:13 PM
Stairway to Heaven

Good :tup:

Jonboy1983
Dec 19, 2012, 9:38 PM
^^ They bring up a great point, what is the status on the Observation deck, did the restaurant get the thumbs up or what? Personally, I'd like there to be like a Burger King or Wendy's up there, that'd be awesome, fast food with a view. Damn right lol

I still wish they hadn't scrapped Windows on the World. What is it with all these high end restaurants that screamed "New York" vanishing from the fabrick? We all know what happened with the original Windows (duh), but Tavern on the Green, the Rainbow Room near the Top of the Rock? It's rather sad...

NewYorkDominates
Dec 19, 2012, 9:43 PM
That is a fantastic picture!

Amazing to say the least.


I wish the mast lights up like the crane.
Talking about antennas...

IrishInNYC

I'm hearing that the first section placement has been bumped out, to the first week in Jan perhaps.

Some pictures of the pieces on the ground, catwalks and other items being added.

http://wirednewyork.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3672&page=863

jmbrooks14
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8077/8286994636_281ddbba38_h.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/josh_brooks/

Linh H. Nguyen
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8286963203_76b8808690_h.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/lng0004/

NYguy
Dec 19, 2012, 10:10 PM
Jay Fine (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jayfine/8283371179/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8362/8283371179_a03f9e67b7_b.jpg




elziZx-nkuU



h3qIkrbpIA0



C_5iY_XVoPw

CarlosV
Dec 19, 2012, 10:36 PM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8077/8289561450_22ed33ba4a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/8289561450/)
1 WTC Dec 19 Sunset 2012 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/8289561450/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

yankeesfan1000
Dec 19, 2012, 10:51 PM
Just gorgeous.

NYC GUY
Dec 20, 2012, 1:09 AM
When will they start installing the antenna cause i still see the pieces on the ground.

nycaddict
Dec 20, 2012, 2:44 AM
will the tower still light up in different colors when it is completed or is that only during construction?

deepen915
Dec 20, 2012, 2:45 AM
great updates guys! :)

Hudson11
Dec 20, 2012, 2:52 AM
will the tower still light up in different colors when it is completed or is that only during construction?

When it's complete it will look like any other office building in lower Manhattan. However the spire will illuminated in different colors depending on the occasion, like the Empire State Building.

NYguy
Dec 20, 2012, 3:56 AM
omoo (http://www.flickr.com/photos/gansv1846/8286403483/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8349/8286403483_f137e1d1f3_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8349/8286403483_7ced351d3d_h.jpg



roccocell (http://www.flickr.com/photos/roccocell/8290313650/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8492/8290313650_05792193ea_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8358/8290313524_7694a1e4d0_h.jpg

NYC
Dec 20, 2012, 4:21 AM
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8349/8286403483_f137e1d1f3_b.jpg

I love the post-rainfall New York vibe I get from this picture. :D

Otie
Dec 20, 2012, 5:33 AM
when will they start installing the antenna cause i still see the pieces on the ground.

2013.

YankeesfaninUT
Dec 20, 2012, 6:40 AM
So why have they pushed back the start date of the spire installation?

NewYorque
Dec 20, 2012, 1:23 PM
Don't know why construction is so slow since a few months...

Ten days since the antenna pieces are here, and they still have not yet assembled it on the rooftop.
Same with concrete base, still not covered by glass, although they had two years to do this.

The Empire State Building was the symbol of America's ambition: built in less than one year, tallest building in the world..

Will One World Trade Center be the symbol of America's skepticism?
Six years before decision to build the tower; seven years to build it (maybe eight); 4 billion dollars; recurrent decisions to reduce costs, even if it spoils the tower's silhouette (spire case); late in delays...

Only positive aspect is that there has been no mortal accident during the construction..

vandelay
Dec 20, 2012, 3:05 PM
First appearance on political propaganda?

http://i.imgur.com/HX16v.jpg?1

ThatOneGuy
Dec 20, 2012, 5:48 PM
I like that old 1920s style poster!

sterlippo1
Dec 20, 2012, 7:23 PM
will the tower still light up in different colors when it is completed or is that only during construction?

that's a Christmas thing. they have used different colors during construction for different calendar events. Remember red white and blue for the 4th?

kpdrummer82
Dec 20, 2012, 7:55 PM
Don't know why construction is so slow since a few months...

Ten days since the antenna pieces are here, and they still have not yet assembled it on the rooftop.
Same with concrete base, still not covered by glass, although they had two years to do this.

The Empire State Building was the symbol of America's ambition: built in less than one year, tallest building in the world..

Will One World Trade Center be the symbol of America's skepticism?
Six years before decision to build the tower; seven years to build it (maybe eight); 4 billion dollars; recurrent decisions to reduce costs, even if it spoils the tower's silhouette (spire case); late in delays...

Only positive aspect is that there has been no mortal accident during the construction..

But you forget that the Empire State Building was a much less complicated design, not nearly as many safety issues were brought up, they didn't have to clean up the biggest tragedy to happen to this country in history and also it was not nearly as tall as 1 WTC. Let us not forget that the original two North and South towers also took 10 years