HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6981  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2021, 9:35 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
That green section with the arched windows is hideous. Not a fan of this building at all. Making the brickwork the same throughout with some patterned contrasts would've worked so much better. Looking at all the beautiful proposals of the suburb city centre buildings, this one looks all the more deplorable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6982  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2021, 9:47 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
But if this looked like the condo towers in downtown Burnaby or Surrey... wouldn't all the towers in the Lower Mainland just look the same?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6983  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 12:04 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Notwithstanding a few details, this is by far the best proposal in terms of basic design and scale than anything in the Olympic Village or anywhere in the inner city in a potentially comparable neighbourhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6984  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 6:22 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
But if this looked like the condo towers in downtown Burnaby or Surrey... wouldn't all the towers in the Lower Mainland just look the same?
They don't have to look the same, and they don't have to look ugly to satisfy the "human scale" criteria. Personally I think this one misses the mark on both. The stack box design isn't avant garde here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6985  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 6:46 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
I had been curious how long Big City would hold out for. You may not be able to get your car fixed in Vancouver soon, with so many repair shops being redeveloped... However, with the move to EV's and their much lower maintenance there may well not be a need for so many auto-repair shops.

Anyways, what are your thoughts on what will be the next OV development........? Not many sites left.

Former Sin Bin Sports Grill site at W 2nd Ave and Crowe St has, if I recall correctly, been sale for some time, Google Street View: https://goo.gl/maps/Cm639dMzjFxiAGR7A

And there's always the giant city owned waterfront site between Cambie Bridge and Hinge Park/Future school beside OV.

Will McDonald's cash out of their Main and Terminal site?

Then there's always the parking lot at Main and Quebec St to the north of the McD's which I think the city owns?

Spill over across W 2nd Ave? East of Main St?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6986  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 7:57 PM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Looking at all the beautiful proposals of the suburb city centre buildings, this one looks all the more deplorable.
Surely you aren't referring to the monstrous boxes that are Amazing Brentwood towers... but obviously your definition of beautiful = tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6987  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 9:01 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
They don't have to look the same, and they don't have to look ugly to satisfy the "human scale" criteria. Personally I think this one misses the mark on both. The stack box design isn't avant garde here.
I agree architecture is subjective. What is the human scale criteria in this case though?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6988  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2021, 11:09 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I agree architecture is subjective. What is the human scale criteria in this case though?
The human scale is out the window in Vancouver anyway.

We might as well stop beating around the bush.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6989  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2021, 7:11 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by squeezied View Post
Surely you aren't referring to the monstrous boxes that are Amazing Brentwood towers... but obviously your definition of beautiful = tall.
my bf says the Brentwood towers are some of his favourites as they are very sleek.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6990  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2021, 2:50 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,642
Just noticed one higher res images for 5 West 2nd:



http://www.jtadevco.com/current-projects#/2803-2865-west-4th-avenue-vancouver/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6991  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2021, 6:00 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I agree architecture is subjective. What is the human scale criteria in this case though?
The city has a tendency to force developers to carve up their buildings to different smaller "sections" as they see fit. They don't like larger buildings with a single theme. I find that this one falls into that category, and it is the dumbest thing ever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
my bf says the Brentwood towers are some of his favourites as they are very sleek.
I'm totally with him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post
I had been curious how long Big City would hold out for. You may not be able to get your car fixed in Vancouver soon, with so many repair shops being redeveloped... However, with the move to EV's and their much lower maintenance there may well not be a need for so many auto-repair shops.

Anyways, what are your thoughts on what will be the next OV development........? Not many sites left.

Former Sin Bin Sports Grill site at W 2nd Ave and Crowe St has, if I recall correctly, been sale for some time, Google Street View: https://goo.gl/maps/Cm639dMzjFxiAGR7A

And there's always the giant city owned waterfront site between Cambie Bridge and Hinge Park/Future school beside OV.

Will McDonald's cash out of their Main and Terminal site?

Then there's always the parking lot at Main and Quebec St to the north of the McD's which I think the city owns?

Spill over across W 2nd Ave? East of Main St?
Lots of potential, but City policies do not generate a lot of interest here at OV when compared to the suburbs. The City-owned lot next to the Main Street Station should've been done like the Anvil Centre in New West, but with more retail. As you can see, it is still nothing but a sad-looking parking lot in such a prime intersection with a trans-national/US railway & coach station, and major skytrain station right at its doorstep. What a waste.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6992  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2021, 6:39 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
The city has a tendency to force developers to carve up their buildings to different smaller "sections" as they see fit. They don't like larger buildings with a single theme. I find that this one falls into that category, and it is the dumbest thing ever.
MA+HG took upon this design on their own though, without input from the City, and in fact going against the City's pre-prescribed "rules" (example being The Pinnacle at Ontario & 1st).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6993  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2021, 6:44 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
With the Arts Club at 1st and Columbia it would be interesting to see where new venues and funding in the area will be directed, but I think it'll go into False Creek Flats by Station St. Lots of moving pieces and great projects coming forward east of Main around 1st and 2nd aves
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6994  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2021, 9:31 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post

June 15

July 17 Photo source: me

TESORO by Concert, just south of Science World.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6995  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 3:31 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Love the massing. The colours Vancouver rarely gets the colour thing right. It's either life-less grey clear-anodized, or some tacky unnatural colour that makes everything else seem even more colourless
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6996  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 5:41 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
I like the other colours except the blue. Then again, it is hard to know what shade they will be as the renderings are so washed out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6997  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 5:54 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post

MA+HG took upon this design on their own though, without input from the City, and in fact going against the City's pre-prescribed "rules"...
Explains why this design is totally superior to other projects in the city. It actually looks like a real building in a real city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6998  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 5:05 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Blue brick is pretty tame. Would be interesting enough still as a white or charcoal.

https://www.dezeen.com/2018/10/16/damien...-trevillion-iridescent-turquoise-bricks/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6999  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 5:34 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
Explains why this design is totally superior to other projects in the city. It actually looks like a real building in a real city.
I think the opposite. To me, it looks like a child's drawing of a building - especially the curved windows. It reminds me of some 1990s post-modern buildings in Europe, but those architects grew up and do more sophisticated buildings these days. A couple of the buildings these architects have designed are contemporary, and for me work better (like 2525 Stephens). I think this post post-modern pile of boxes might have worked in a different location, but if it's built as illustrated will look very out of place in the SEFC context.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7000  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2021, 6:22 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
Anyone think it is getting harder to find a place to get your car fixed in Vancouver as more and more are demolished, close, etc?

Vancouver open data business licenses for auto repair would seem to support this theory:

2020 214
2019 239
2018 248
2017 259
2016 258
2015 277
2014 290
2013 298

?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.