Posted Mar 8, 2021, 4:18 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,277
|
|
Something else that we are going to see is perhaps the greatest setback to professional women since before WWII. Due to the pandemic, women have left the workforce at a rate 10x that of men (with over 100,000 having permanently left), largely to take care of children at home. This is disastrous, and is going to create a generation of leaders with a gap in qualified women in their ranks. Women already have it much harder than men in terms of moving up corporate ladders and government positions thanks to existing hurdles (punished for taking mat leave, seen as less qualified unless they can outperform men by large margins, etc), so this is only going to hurt more.
Basically, coming out of this pandemic, we are going to see massive pain in the working class, and long-term reduction in qualified women at senior levels. These are systemic issues that must be addressed.
Aberrant, I would say that decisions based on fear are a good thing, in terms of the pandemic. I hope your comment doesn't imply that you believe people who are pro-mask, pro-restrictions, etc, are "afraid," and that this is bad (this is a common rhetoric from anti-mask people). There is good reason to be afraid of the spread of COVID-19, and while we can argue in good faith about specific measures governments have taken and what their effectiveness has been, there is no arguing how dangerous the disease is, and how many deaths have been averted thanks to restrictions. Fear is a useful emotion, and anyone not afraid of what a disease can do to them is not taking it seriously enough. I apologize if I misinterpreted your comment.
|