Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
The difference today though is that virtually no one (worth listening to) in the U.S. is saying that the cops involved should get off scot free and that reforms aren't needed in the oversight of police work. Left or right.
What (some) people are objecting to is the notion that a) all police officers are corrupt, brutish pieces of shit and b) that because a) + that the U.S. is somewhere in the neighbourhood of Nazi Germany in its treatment of minorities, c) that any and all types of behaviour are forms of justifiable or at least comprehensible "resistance".
Those last points I just made are basically the flip side of people saying that "all looters should be shot", and which makes you get all irate.
|
If we step back and ask the question, where do we want to be in five years that defines what we aspire to accomplish and then we can start to talk about how do we get there.
If the goal is a police force that is blind to race. Great idea, but good luck with that. No one is going to be believes that doing some sensitivity training will will make this problem go away. Perhaps we need a deeper re-think of what policing is all about.
So, this event started with a fake $20 bill at a store. Under the law we have an evil doer and a victim. But is that really the case? The person who printed the fake money is the evil doer, everyone else in the chain of custody of that $20 is a victim. So why was the police arresting anyone to being with?
Even now there are hundreds of people being arrested for breaking curfew. Why is this even a law? Curfew is something parents impose on there kids so they get enough sleep to go to school next day.
I know one of the former elected chiefs of a first nations community here in BC that once told me growing up as a kid curfews were used by the police to arrest community members where off reserve, because the assumption was if they were off reserve they were up to no good. Silly law.
The reason these US cities have curfew laws is to make the jobs of the police easier. They don't need to wait for a real crime they can arrest anyone who looks like they may commit a crime simply for being outside after 8pm. What a load of nonsense. So how do they decide if the person looks like a criminal? What they are wearing? Their age? Other aspects of how they look?
Breaking into stores is a crime and they should be going after those.
Perhaps we need to rethink the whole policing thing from the ground up.