Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXbowhunter
This morning's WSJ had a front page discussion about what cities are best positioned for HQ2, and Austin was listed as a long shot. They ranked it as the 7th most likely choice behind Dallas, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Seattle, Chicago, Denver, NYC and Nashville. It claimed that it was using the same criteria that has put Austin at the top of the list. Also, not sure why Seattle was on it since they already have their HQ there (?). I would post the link but not tech-savvy enough for that  |
Having not seen the article, I'm guessing that their "evaluation" is like many others. They pick and choose their categories to evaluate on, assign an arbitrary weight for each, score each city per category, and then compile overall city scores.
I hardly think that this is the appropriate way to predict the winner.
Threaded Mode