Posted Nov 14, 2017, 8:49 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,581
|
|
"change in unemployment rate in 2015"
So a city (like Austin) that has been at (over) full employment for years, and stays low while absorbing a huge population increase gets ranked lower than a city climbing out of the shitter?
Right.
Btw, which of those circles was Austin? Edit: Weird, the names weren't showing up for me before.
|
Threaded Mode