Mount Baker looks almost as cool as Mount Hood. Love to climb it one summer ( Baker).
You can drive up to 1700 meters and do some hikes in there, but I don't think there is any public route to the top of the mountain itself. It is covered in huge glacier year-round and will require technical gear to get up there. I have never seen a photo taken from the top, so I doubt it is very common to get up there.
It's a rather recent pic that I saved to my comp so apologies to whoever I'm not giving credit to. I even tried reverse searching the image but keep getting pics of Monaco lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn
The stamp says Klaus Johansson who posts here. Forgot his screen name but a wicked photographer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity
His username is Klazu, from Vancouver
Thanks for solving the mystery, guys! It seems that even watermarking one's photos is not always enough to signal who the original photographer was...
^^^ Ya and even the top of Mt Baker ski resort is not at the top.
Yeah, it is actually not even on Mount Baker but a high ridge next to it. Spectacular scenery in that area. I was so looking forward to go skiing there this past winter, but the weather decided otherwise...
In real life you can barely see Baker with your own yes from that house on the rock. It is over 100 kilometers away and does not loom like in that photo. I have to say the photo is EPIC and I love it, but the illusion is all thanks to a very long lens focal length. Too bad that the photo doesn't have information on what lens was used.
Prev
It seems that even watermarking one's photos is not always enough to signal who the original photographer was... 
Linear Mode
