HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 2:48 AM
isaidso isaidso is online now
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by MexiQuebecois View Post
That's one beautiful shot of North York!
The buildings do look equally monotonous, don't they? One Wall is the only structure that stands out. A beautiful setting, but they forgot to build beautiful buildings to match.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 3:08 AM
Delirium's Avatar
Delirium Delirium is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,227
Show me a picture of a similar area built between the 50's-70's that has any 'architectural style' to it. St-James town perhaps? For someone who's never been to the west coast, you sure do have an 'opinion' on the area-
__________________
My Flickr: www.flickr.com/oct2gon
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 4:01 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Maybe it's a compliment. Historic areas which people rave about can be impressively monotonous in form, details and, colour.
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 4:09 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Maybe it's a compliment. Historic areas which people rave about can be impressively monotonous in form, details and, colour.
I was thinking this as well, in fact I can't think of any city that doesn't have massive areas primarily consisting of one or two different architectural styles (usually a window into their "Boom Times"). Even the Holy skyline grail of New York can look very monotonous from many vantage points.

Same with any skyline here in Japan from most angles, and South America, and Toronto, and Montreal, etc... in fact the only cities that don't have such "monotony" are usually ones with very few residential towers, such as LA or Houston.

Korean cities are extremely monotonous, as are Chinese cities (but we are always only shown pics of the core CBDs). Vancouver's CBD is also very layered with many different styles.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 5:15 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,978
Vancouver certainly has some very attractive older high rises and due to Vancouver's stunted height they are still quite prominent.

I know what you mean about the monotony of Vancouver skyscrapers but Toronto is nothing to be proud of.

Vancouver, however, will never get any truly iconic or even very high quality buildings due to the restrictions on buildings. Not only is there a height restriction but also, unlike most cities, there is also a footprint restriction. This is why Vancouver has so many incredibly thin towers. Considering the sheer number of buildings in downtown/West End Vancouver, the population is not as great as one would expect.

Still quite heavily populated but the buildings are not very tall and have a very small footprint so the number of units/tenants in each building is far lower than most cities.

Vancouver won't get any form of iconic buildings because when you have to have a limited height on with a very small footprint, it leaves far fewer options for truly bold and innovative high-rise design. This is made even worse by Vancouver having no head offices of any relevant size so all new office buildings tend to be short and bland because they rely on a lot of small rentals and not large companies taking the lion's share of the space.
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 6:54 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Nice photo of Mao! LOL!
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 7:15 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,524
     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 7:39 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Pacific Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,234
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 10:13 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
A beautiful setting, but they forgot to build beautiful buildings to match.
We hear that cliche a lot around here, just like "100 metres is now mid-rise", but I can't think of another city that consistently does better modern residential high-rise architecture.
     
     
  #3470  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 10:43 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Pacific Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,234
     
     
  #3471  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 6:33 PM
scrapin scrapin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 241






low quality phone photos by me. lol.
     
     
  #3472  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2014, 11:30 PM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,434
^ City looks MASSIVE.
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
     
     
  #3473  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 12:51 AM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794

Montreal sunset by Fred_514, on Flickr
     
     
  #3474  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 4:42 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
You can see that linear skyline north of the Central Business District... not the same depth as the Business District/Downtown Vancouver .

Everything is on just Bay and Yonge.
     
     
  #3475  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 4:46 AM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapin View Post






low quality phone photos by me. lol.
Nice! Looking a whole lot different from the last time I was there and that was only 5 years ago!
     
     
  #3476  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 8:45 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415

ImagesofToronto by schauh, on Flickr
     
     
  #3477  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 9:00 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
     
     
  #3478  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2014, 6:42 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,598
Vancouver from the Scotia Tower, click to enlarge


http://imgur.com/cmFm2Q9
     
     
  #3479  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2015, 2:08 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,524
     
     
  #3480  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2015, 10:32 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Pacific Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,234
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:14 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.