Quote:
Originally Posted by shmakim
The idea of a building clad in greenery sounds nice somewhere in the states or Victoria, but in wintery Saskatoon, it's gonna look awful and brown for 8 months of the year. Witness those creeping vines in the median planters on 25th Street. They look great in the summer, but around now, ouch.
If there's any way to make it work though, it'd be a radically different look than anything Saskatoon's ever seen.
|
Wintery Saskatoon? 8 months of brown? According to your opinion, we should have downtown streets devoid of trees and plants, and minimal to no vegetation in our parks and private yards. If designers/builders chose appropriate plants for the building, I am certain it would look wonderful standing next to any other building in downtown Saskatoon, during any season of the year.
Source - Saskatoon in: No Hoar like a Christmas Hoar
Source - Saskatoon in: No Hoar like a Christmas Hoar
Source - Saskatoon in: No Hoar like a Christmas Hoar
I'll be honest, I am dreaming/brainstorming more than anything.
I posted the San Francisco project because it contrasts the design elements of the North Prairie project; glass/solar panel exterior, incorporating vegetation, publicly accessible rooftop open space.
North Prairie has very different goals in mind as compared to the San Francisco project, these differences will obviously affect design decisions. However, a notable similarity of the San Francisco and Saskatoon projects is both are speculative; encouraged by local market demand they have designed their products with the intent to capture some of that demand. Does design affect the ability to sell office space or set lease rates? Of course, but as I said before Saskatoon will likely see a few more "mediocre" buildings before tenants demand or city policy encourages more attractive design elements.