HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3441  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 3:07 PM
The Macallan The Macallan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 129
There is indeed a gap between the Central Business District and "Southcore". It is caused chiefly by the wide spread of railway tracks, as noted above, in and around Union Station. The angle does make matters a little deceiving, however. For example, the building with the angled roof in the centre of the lower area is the Ritz Carlton, I think, which is about 210 m tall. It's just farther away. As also noted above, when and if the construction of the very tall structures at 1 Yonge etc takes place, the apparent gap from this angle will be closed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3442  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 3:09 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralLeeTPHLS View Post
I was out at Tommy Thompson Park yesterday, here's an update and just a little way of showing how these things are getting into the skyline, first

One Bloor:
[IMG]Yorkville Skies by Joshua Kennington Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]

And.....Ten York, left :
[IMG]Main Core (Ten York) by Joshua Kennington Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]


Brave man heading out there on such a cold night.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

Last edited by TorontoDrew; Mar 23, 2017 at 6:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3443  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 4:58 PM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Brave man heading out thier on such a cold night.
I'd argue against that basis. I went there at about 6:50 pm, around sunset time, and left after about 25 minutes because the lake-created wind was VERY substantial.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3444  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 6:06 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Yes, 1 Yonge and the Lakeshore East developments will plug up this skyline gap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3445  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 7:17 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Massey Tower - 208 m



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3446  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 3:21 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralLeeTPHLS View Post
I'd argue against that basis. I went there at about 6:50 pm, around sunset time, and left after about 25 minutes because the lake-created wind was VERY substantial.
He's just being a dick because I disagreed with him on Toronto being a cold place where spending millions on outdoor living space next to the lake isn't the biggest bang for your buck. This is based on experience having once rented a condo with a terrace bigger than the unit and living by the lake now. Even if you don't believe me than, explain why Queens Quay retail struggles and a massive plus 15 network connecting climate control retail malls is being built.

first one from the top.
https://www.google.ca/maps/place/120+St+...7789dd01e!8m2!3d43.6534199!4d-79.3899873
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3447  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 5:51 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Harbourplaza Condo - picture from last weekend

238 meters



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3448  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 6:20 PM
jakethesnake jakethesnake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
I must say I'm really surprised by all the love that Brookfield Place is getting by everyone outside the city. I mean I don't mind it and the glass is nice but it's no Bow or Telus Sky.
I actually think Brookfield is much better than Bow. In fact I really dislike the Bow in Calgary's skyline. Telus sky looks good too though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3449  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 7:47 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Mmmmm.....


1. Telus Sky

2. Brooky

3. Le Bow
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3450  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 8:52 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakethesnake View Post
I actually think Brookfield is much better than Bow. In fact I really dislike the Bow in Calgary's skyline. Telus sky looks good too though.
I agree. From most angles, it is too wide, and looks stubby.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3451  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 9:27 PM
holhm22 holhm22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 315
If The Bow was skinnier it would've looked better. Interesting design, but it's a chubby one for sure. I thought too that it would be neat if The Bow were to have a LED lighting setup at night like the Bank of China Tower in Hong Kong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3452  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2017, 2:50 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakethesnake View Post
I actually think Brookfield is much better than Bow. In fact I really dislike the Bow in Calgary's skyline. Telus sky looks good too though.
Both towers have some massing issues (note: I'm not basing it on how they look in the overall skyline) The Bow has much more interesting element to make up for the massing. The only design element I really disagree with is the spine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3453  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2017, 6:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,951
If the Bow had been 10-15 taller and 25% narrower it would be one of the top towers in the world as I see it... but as is, it is awkward*

*i'd still take it
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3454  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2017, 7:10 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Both towers have some massing issues (note: I'm not basing it on how they look in the overall skyline) The Bow has much more interesting element to make up for the massing. The only design element I really disagree with is the spine.
Really? I think the spine is the only redeeming feature of the backside.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3455  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2017, 6:22 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
He's just being a dick because I disagreed with him on Toronto being a cold place where spending millions on outdoor living space next to the lake isn't the biggest bang for your buck.

first one from the top.
https://www.google.ca/maps/place/120+St+...7789dd01e!8m2!3d43.6534199!4d-79.3899873

Being a "DICK" really? That comment had nothing to do with the other post. I made that comment because it looked like he chose to go out on the Spit what was a very blustery day (March 21st). We had winds up to 74km that day. It had nothing to do with a great condo proposal in another thread. Whippesnapper does somebody piss in you cereal every morning that turns you into such a bitter person and act like such a "DICK" to so many people on this website? Get over yourself.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3456  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2017, 10:52 PM
vaportrail's Avatar
vaportrail vaportrail is offline
That's no excuse!
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 387
Stantec update from March 27, 2017.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3457  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 12:00 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,051
Very exciting times for Edmonton. About time really.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3458  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 4:35 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Ten Yorl - 225 meters

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3459  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 1:08 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Really? I think the spine is the only redeeming feature of the backside.
the cross bracing is the best part and the spine is a crass interruption.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3460  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2017, 1:34 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,626
I still can't believe how nice Harbourplaza Condos are turning out. I've said it a dozen times now but I really thought they would end up looking busy and messy but I like them as much as Ice now.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.