Quote:
Originally Posted by ace.yyc
Of course, but what AC can draw from YYZ is obviously quite different than what WS can draw from YYC. The two aren't remotely comparable.
|
Yes, very true. It might be good to understand that city size and economy are two dominating factors in determining which airlines become destinations.
Icelandic airlines work very well out of Seattle, for example, due to the very large Scandinavian population there. Before that, for decades,
SAS Scandinavian Airlines had a nonstop Seattle>< Seattle Copenhagen route both for CPH as a destination, and onward connections in Scandinavia. Seattle has most other major gateway airports in Europe, DUB, LHR, LGW, AMS, FRA, CDG, IST, and seasonally Helsinki on Finnair.
But Icelandic seems to offer competitive pricing, and also has a market for mainland Europe.
As for Calgary itself, and the airline destination roster, certain routes will just have to wait. Calgary already punches far above its weight for a city of its modest metro population, but the economy drives it fast.
Calgary already has an impressive roster of destinations, and it will only continue to grow.