Quote:
Originally Posted by msmariner
Like I said Air Canada is national airline (taxpayer’s subsidized it for a long time)
|
The last time taxpayers gave money to AC and never got it back was 14 years ago. I think it's time you get over that fact. And all this time, until now, AC has managed to maintain some form of hub status at YYC, despite WS massively increasing its footprint there these last 14 years.
AC recently released their Q4 and full year numbers for 2022. It's better than 2021, but by no means are they over the massive hill that was COVID. They need to cut costs and concentrate their operations where it counts. And that's YYZ/YUL and YVR.
As previous posters have said, YYC isn't big enough to sustain 2 hub carriers. Or would you rather AC stays at YYC (and everywhere else it cut service) and continue bleeding money and get another taxpayer bailout?
AC is doing the same as WS. Retrenching to it's core markets to boost profitability in an increasingly challenging environment. You seem to have no problem with what WS did (focus on YYC, and pull down YYZ, Quebec and Atlantic Canada), but are somehow holding AC accountable merely because they got a bailout 14 years ago. Doesn't make any sense.
I think it's time you realize your concept of national airline is outdated.
WS is just as much a national airline as AC. If anything, the fact that AC was government owned back in the day is a hurdle, not an advantage. (ACPPA is one such hurdle. There are more....) AC has to jump through many more hoops to meet its government requirements. That's not the case at WS. And yet, YYC still has AC service to key markets in Europe and the US. And from what I've been told by numerous people in the know, they will come back to YYC when the time is right.
So, knowing all of that, if you still
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner
expect more from the “national” airline.
|
you should lower your expectations.