Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture
so why is Langley before this one? this is way more important than Langley.
is it just because this one is more expensive?
|
I'm actually not convinced this project would be
that much more expensive.
About 2/3 of it must be tunneled which definitely shoots the cost up and the biggest criticism of this project I've heard is "it's a long distance to build without many stations or density to support it", but the SLS project is twice as long with twice as many stations and it even runs through ALR farmland in places. (Admittedly, Fleetwood is denser than the West Side, but UBC has almost 3x as many students as the entire population of Langley City and that's not counting staff, faculty and non-university traffic)
If they only continued the tunneling they're
already doing the extra cost surely must not be that much more?
To some degree there's probably a few political games being played here. I've definitely heard comments such as "Vancouver and Burnaby get all the transit expansions while SoF municipalities get none which isn't
fair" before. Vancouver-Point Grey is becoming a safe BCNDP seat and Vancouver Quadra is the safest LPC seat out there. Meanwhile, the LPC and BCNDP are both probably still looking at their seats in Surrey and Langley with discomfort and suspicion. There aren't that many political wins to be had on the Vancouver West Side for the governments in power for building the UBC extension, it's just the right thing to do.
On the other hand, there's definitely far, far greater growth potential in Fleetwood, Cloverdale, and Langley than in West Point Grey.