Yeah, they did not issue renderings/drawings of the negative aspects
(long Seymour frontage and blank/un-neghbourly north and alley side of the project).
Those are only seen on the model (and pics of the model).
There is a close-up rendering of the bike lane on Seymour, but not the whole frontage.
They mention that they don't go as high as the view cone limits, but it seems to be the same height as The Hudson on the Granville side, which is limited by the Granville Bridge view cone.
So if they go to full view cone heights across the whole site, I think you'd see shorter height on the Granville side than the Seymour side.
That's probably why they aren't at the maximum heights - to keep the "cube" look on the Georgia frontage.
So if current view cone policy is maintained, then expect the same squat bulky building on the Bay Parkade site.
***************
Here's an office & 22 storey residential tower project called
111 CastleReagh being built above a former department store in
Sydney, Australia.
You can see that they did not use full site coverage for the tower and there's a wing of the former department store that is not built on (that wing is like the north wing of the HBC store).
That shows the massing that you can do when you can build taller.
https://111castlereagh.com.au/
Article on the Sydney project:
https://www.sidespace.com.au/index.php/m...lopment-of-former-david-jones-mens-store
This article shows 4 runners-up to a design competition for that Sydney site:
https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/scentre-and-cbus-partner-for-300m-heritage-development
Webpage for one of the losing proposals for that Sydney site:
https://www.woodsbagot.com/projects/77-market-street/