Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
A relative of mine who was a Toronto cop (now retired) worked in community policing in some less well-off areas, and used to say that the African-American rhetoric and culture (covering everything from the "ghetto", the projects, cops, Jim Crow, busing, segregation, civil rights movement, MLK, Malcolm X, Black Panthers, etc.) resonated surprisingly strongly among kids there, in spite of the fact that almost none of them were of African-American origin.
|
Yep. You also see a bit of vagueness around the use of the term POC which connotes historical treatment of African-Americans yet may include recent immigrants who either chose to move here or whose parents chose to move here. Obviously immigrants should not be discriminated against but they do not have the same historical injustice claims as freed slaves in the US and indigenous North Americans.
Asians tend to be more successful than average in North America. There is nothing wrong with it but it makes me wonder if outcomes really have so much to do with white racist people keeping people with other skin tones down, consciously or subconsciously. I don't deny that racism exists but I think it can be harmful to jump to the conclusion that it's
the singular social issue and ignore other stuff.
One complaint I have heard about affirmative action in the United States is that it ended up being about skin colour so many of the people benefiting are African or West Indian immigrants while underprivileged African-Americans don't see much benefit (Coleman Hughes, a good writer who is African-American, wrote about this). I am not sure that African-Americans have been that well-served by the way recent social justice campaigns have gone. Likewise for indigenous Canadians, particularly those living in more remote areas who don't get much airtime.