HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2020, 6:49 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 29,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
This is one thing I really don't get with the government. Even though it won't solve every problem, or even much of the problem at all, buying new rolling stock (more than they are ordering, which is a start) is an easy win. It's a rounding error over a few years on their budget and would go a long way to encouraging public support.
Because the public doesn't care. When HFR finally becomes real, the public perception of rail will change and the demand for inter-city rail investment will go up. What's critical here is not how many cities or jurisdictions are covered. It's how many trips can be facilitated by rail as quickly as possible. I really want to see Calgary-Edmonton enter the discussion, despite the capital costs of new corridor. It's the other obvious corridor beyond Quebec-Windsor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.