Quote:
Originally Posted by Spocket
Without high density near stations a la TOD, I have no idea how transit was ever expecting to see a ridership increase. If you've got your own personal vehicle in Winnipeg, there's virtually nothing attractive in the least about bus or rail. Really... it would be a novelty for people who haven't already decided to leave their cars at home. At best, you might get people who want to give it shot once or twice for the hell of it. Public transit can be great but if it's not nearly as convenient as your own car, why would anybody bother?
|
Evidence worldwide concludes that rail-based RT spurs TOD to a much greater extent than bus-based RT.
Are you suggesting that Winnipeg has a higher rate of car ownership than Calgary or Ottawa? Not likely.
Population x Winnipeg
Calgary 1.76
Ottawa 1.32
Transit daily ridership numbers x Winnipeg
Calgary 2.19
Ottawa 2.61
I didn't realize this until today but now I'm even more disillusioned about what this city is doing.
From Wikipedia:
"In March 2018, the (Quebec) City with the Government of Quebec announced the construction of a 23 km long tramway line for $ 3 billion. The line will link Charlesbourg to Cap-Rouge, passing through Quebec Parliament Hill. There will be a 3.5 km underground in this part. The service frequency will be 3 to 5 minutes in peak periods, 10 to 15 minutes during the day and weekend. Passenger capacity will be 260 per tramway. The Quebec City tramway should be in service in 2026".
That includes three river crossings including a crossing of the wide St. Lawrence as well as 3.5 km underground. A line of similar length (23 km, almost exactly the same as the length of a line from Unicity to Glenway and Henderson) in Winnipeg without any underground section would be perhaps half that cost, $1.5 to $2.0 billion tops. The 11 km BRT will come in at about $0.5 billion.
I could cry.