HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7921  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 5:37 PM
Ando Ando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAKGUY View Post
I get the feeling / premonition some thing large in scale will be announced for downtown Winnipeg in short order.
Are you channeling Biff?
     
     
  #7922  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 5:59 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,259
^^ well we are over due for some relatively large proposal. I don't believe anyone has made one since 300 main was announced (well maybe sutton if you count their announcement last summer that they would be proceeding). If only Harvard had an ace up their sleeve for 416 main
     
     
  #7923  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 6:04 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
I would be interested in what Artis has planned for Fort Street (Vendome). We have not heard anything for a couple of years now.
     
     
  #7924  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 6:12 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Well Drew (I think it was) has mentioned there is a project we will all love coming soon. Also the Boyd building addition/twin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
I would be interested in what Artis has planned for Fort Street (Vendome). We have not heard anything for a couple of years now.
Did they officially purchase it? If so, why haven't they shut down the bar if that's what they were so worried about?

If they are planning on redevelopment, it'd make sense to wait til 300/330 is more along in development and leaseholds to have a better sense of the market would be in terms of building/land use for the Vendome.

Anyone know what sort of historic elements are left inside Vendome (if any) that would make it worth restoring?
     
     
  #7925  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 6:27 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
^^ well we are over due for some relatively large proposal. I don't believe anyone has made one since 300 main was announced (well maybe sutton if you count their announcement last summer that they would be proceeding). If only Harvard had an ace up their sleeve for 416 main
Last summer Harvard said they would wait for TNS to finish and settle into the market before making any decisions on 416 Main, said it would be five years out before anything concrete, they have their hands full trying to fill the vacant space in 201, they should be starting their lobby redevelopment soon.
     
     
  #7926  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 7:40 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
Well Drew (I think it was) has mentioned there is a project we will all love coming soon. Also the Boyd building addition/twin.
It wasn't me - I think it was Mr. Viking or Biff.
     
     
  #7927  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 7:48 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
Last summer Harvard said they would wait for TNS to finish and settle into the market before making any decisions on 416 Main, said it would be five years out before anything concrete, they have their hands full trying to fill the vacant space in 201, they should be starting their lobby redevelopment soon.
I just wish I knew if they were looking at any sort of ideas and if they had done any work at all. Basically just pick the brain of the head of their development team to see what they have in mind. They must have some idea of what to put on the land.
     
     
  #7928  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 8:07 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
That Metropolitan sign is cool. RIP.
My grandmother worked there for decades.
     
     
  #7929  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 10:34 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
I just wish I knew if they were looking at any sort of ideas and if they had done any work at all. Basically just pick the brain of the head of their development team to see what they have in mind. They must have some idea of what to put on the land.
Contact rosanne hill blaisdell see what she has to say.
     
     
  #7930  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2018, 10:50 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
Question for TV as an outsider – it seems like a lot of these local architecture companies producing a lot of these basic, cheap designs (that they would deem "modern") are borne of recent, young U of M grads... has the school lost is way? Or does the problem fall moreso on the developers and city for being cheap and approving ugly, respectively?
It's challenging to design within modern profit margins, as they're always getting slimmer... sometimes creativity with these constraints backfires.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wardlow View Post
I'm not an architect, and not defending 254 Wellington's design in particular, but most of what I've seen of these younger upstart firms doing infill projects is they're managing to do good design for risky projects that have low capital and low returns.
THIIIIIIS.

Well, 254 Wellington is ugly but that's the principle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by peg View Post
I would say that the problem probably lies more with the developer side of things, though that is more beyond my knowledge as a student.
Nope. If it made the required money while achieving the design intent, it would proceed close to render.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DowntownBooster View Post
The point is that they shouldn't bother with the fancy looking rendering to begin with even if it is just for marketing purposes only. If there is no intention for the final product to look anything like the initial drawing then skip the false hype and just actually draw something that will actually look the same as what is to be built. The only thing similar in this case is the overall shape of the structure. It's like showing someone a picture of a crystal glass ornamental round ball and then presenting them with one of those red, white and blue rubber balls and saying - "okay, here you go".
No, no no...

Renderings ARE marketing but the intent is usually intact. It's not that they "cheap out" or "get greedy", but rather that the project would not proceed at all unless necessary money is saved. Unfortunately, not every builder/developer/architect is very precise at estimating their costs, and similarly, sometimes they get hosed by trades.

Few architects and developers would risk besmirching their own name by reducing a design like that without needing to.
     
     
  #7931  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 12:16 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
I think it’s really more on the city to have some rules. Realistically, rental rates haven’t gone up much here the last decade+ and we’re still probably the cheapest major city to live in in Canada. Maybe it’s time to have some minimum standards, and if that causes rates to go up a bit, that may not be a bad thing.
     
     
  #7932  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 3:01 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAKGUY View Post
I get the feeling / premonition some thing large in scale will be announced for downtown Winnipeg in short order.
im guesing this is the group behind that 40 story proposal that was tried for 100 main st? number yrs back and they got them self a peic of braodway now

but im just throwing the biggest wildest gues to stir the pot here folks..
     
     
  #7933  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 3:55 AM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
im guesing this is the group behind that 40 story proposal that was tried for 100 main st? number yrs back and they got them self a peic of braodway now

but im just throwing the biggest wildest gues to stir the pot here folks..
Are you referring to Crystal Properties? Those are the guys that developed 300 Assiniboine and did the land swap with the city. Was that not the proposal for 100 Main?
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
     
     
  #7934  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 4:32 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,976
One in the fall....one likely in the spring. Maybe winter.
     
     
  #7935  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 11:52 AM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
One in the fall....one likely in the spring. Maybe winter.
Announcements?

Multiple large projects on the horizon?
     
     
  #7936  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 1:24 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spocket View Post
Are you referring to Crystal Properties? Those are the guys that developed 300 Assiniboine and did the land swap with the city. Was that not the proposal for 100 Main?
no one of the other bidders

not sure who they were that bit was never made public but a rendering did float around for it. was some sorta 40 story mix use project right at assinboine and fort

Last edited by 1ajs; Aug 29, 2018 at 1:42 PM.
     
     
  #7937  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 1:30 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,712
So I was looking at my property tax and it's zoned as

R1M - Res - S F - Medium

Does anyone know what that means?
     
     
  #7938  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 1:35 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,518
just a r1 single family zoning
     
     
  #7939  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 1:50 PM
wardlow's Avatar
wardlow wardlow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
So I was looking at my property tax and it's zoned as

R1M - Res - S F - Medium

Does anyone know what that means?
R1 zones are single-family residential, meaning only single-family dwelling is allowed. I think the "Medium" applies to the minimum lot size, side yards, etc. you're allowed to have (compared to R1-Large or R1-Small. R1-M is a pretty common zoning category for Winnipeg's older residential neighbourhoods.
     
     
  #7940  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 2:00 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
no one of the other bidders

not sure who they were that bit was never made public but a rendering did float around for it. was some sorta 40 story mix use project right at assinboine and fort
Architect was Cibinel



__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:54 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.