Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg
Question for TV as an outsider – it seems like a lot of these local architecture companies producing a lot of these basic, cheap designs (that they would deem "modern") are borne of recent, young U of M grads... has the school lost is way? Or does the problem fall moreso on the developers and city for being cheap and approving ugly, respectively?
|
It's challenging to design within modern profit margins, as they're always getting slimmer... sometimes creativity with these constraints backfires.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wardlow
I'm not an architect, and not defending 254 Wellington's design in particular, but most of what I've seen of these younger upstart firms doing infill projects is they're managing to do good design for risky projects that have low capital and low returns.
|
THIIIIIIS.
Well, 254 Wellington is ugly but that's the principle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peg
I would say that the problem probably lies more with the developer side of things, though that is more beyond my knowledge as a student.
|
Nope. If it made the required money while achieving the design intent, it would proceed close to render.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DowntownBooster
The point is that they shouldn't bother with the fancy looking rendering to begin with even if it is just for marketing purposes only. If there is no intention for the final product to look anything like the initial drawing then skip the false hype and just actually draw something that will actually look the same as what is to be built. The only thing similar in this case is the overall shape of the structure. It's like showing someone a picture of a crystal glass ornamental round ball and then presenting them with one of those red, white and blue rubber balls and saying - "okay, here you go".
|
No, no no...
Renderings ARE marketing but the intent is usually intact. It's not that they "cheap out" or "get greedy", but rather that the project would not proceed at all unless necessary money is saved. Unfortunately, not every builder/developer/architect is very precise at estimating their costs, and similarly, sometimes they get hosed by trades.
Few architects and developers would risk besmirching their own name by reducing a design like that without needing to.