Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefox
I don't disagree. As I said previously, there is almost 100% certainty that TransLink will stick with the naming conventions it's used for previous lines and use cross streets or landmarks to name stations.
I'm honestly just surprised by the level of hand-wringing over indigenous place names by some of the other commenters here and the refusal (at this point) to even acknowledge that for some people it might actually mean a lot to see themselves reflected in *anything* of relevance or importance in this city.
|
Sure, but I don't
entirely blame them. The City's doing a real crap job of implementing Salish names right now.
Take the "Nə́c̓aʔmat ct Strathcona Branch" (Nathtsahmast, I believe). From a non-Indigenous prespective, it's superfluous, unpronounceable and tokenist. From an Indigenous perspective, it's a First Nations-only prefix attached to a "normal-sounding" name, like the linguistic equivalent of Whites Only/Coloureds Only bathrooms... and also tokenist. And if you call it the "Nə́c̓aʔmat ct Branch," obviously nobody except the First Nations will know what or where the hell it is.
To tie it all back to transit, I doubt that many people want a name like "X̱áywá7esks Main Street-Science World;" "Tsai'wa'esks Main Street-Science World" or just "Tsai'wa'esks" might work, but it's still going to cause headaches and confusion.
J.OT13 noted a few pages back that it works if you rename the neighbourhood - or create a new one - for brand recognition, but then you run into the problem of having most of the city already named (Olympic Village, Kerrisdale, Strathcona, etc).