HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8041  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 4:36 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
I'd recommend thinking of that as a unsubstantiated rumor at this point. It's possible but not that plausible. Why would Nutrien have ~500 employees in Regina?

The space hasn't been leased since late last year. It's not the former CGI building, they are still there. A different tenant left the building.
The Co-operators used to have a few floors there, but consolidated at College a few years back... Direct West used to have a fair bit of staff in that building too. Were those the 2 you were thinking, or another?
     
     
  #8042  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 1:12 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
The Co-operators used to have a few floors there, but consolidated at College a few years back... Direct West used to have a fair bit of staff in that building too. Were those the 2 you were thinking, or another?
The majority of the space vacated was the Co-operators.
     
     
  #8043  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 2:23 PM
Robk Robk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 19
That design shown by "One brick at a time" was by Number 10 Architectural group. Design I was talking about was done in house at Brandt and does not resemble this building in the least, footprint, look or style.
     
     
  #8044  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 2:36 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robk View Post
Did renders of the new CNIB about 4 years ago. If the design stayed similar to the images I produced it will be a winner. Can't say whether the design has changed since I left there. Can't / Won't post any of those images without permission.
All I can say is I hope it goes ahead. Nicer than the new College Ave new buildings in my opinion.
Can you mention the general style or theme of the design you worked on? Was it primarily brick, glass, etc?
     
     
  #8045  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 5:12 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,272
Now that the GTH is $37M in debt, the province wants to either offload it or get into a partnership with the city of Regina. I think this is a bad idea for the city.

http://leaderpost.com/news/saskatchewan/province-considering-offloading-gth-to-city-of-regina?
     
     
  #8046  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 5:50 PM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
Now that the GTH is $37M in debt, the province wants to either offload it or get into a partnership with the city of Regina. I think this is a bad idea for the city.

http://leaderpost.com/news/saskatchewan/province-considering-offloading-gth-to-city-of-regina?
It's an absolutely ridiculous idea - unless the province is planning to establish an ongoing funding commitment to compensate the City for the burden they're assuming (and hope that the City forgets the Province reneged on the Crown taxes-in-lieu after memories faded).

I guess if the prov were interested in winding-down the GTH as an entity, and transferring the land to the City (at no cost), that's an option worth exploring... but virtually anything else - why? There's already been enough offloading/downloading from the Prov to the City... why would the City volunteer to take on additional expensive provincial albatross like the GTH (much less pay the Province for the privilege of taking it on)? Why? It's a money-loser, it stands no chance of being anything more than an industrial park. Chasing major tenants is a shell game that we're bound to lose.

Glad to see the Mayor's initial comments weren't exactly enthusiastic, but I would've taken the opportunity to present the City's opening volley - the City will only contemplate taking a limited role, and only in a manner that guarantees a return. Basically, a fee-for-service (with a profit included) for assuming the management (not ownership) of the land on behalf of the Province.
__________________
@drofmab
     
     
  #8047  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 10:42 PM
Rodo Regina Lover Rodo Regina Lover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 214
I have a suggestion for Brandt, why not build your new building on the east side of the 1800 blk Broad St. This will help revitalize an area that is in desperate need of it! Also if they do build in the park, will there be ZERO surface parking?
     
     
  #8048  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2018, 10:45 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodo Regina Lover View Post
I have a suggestion for Brandt, why not build your new building on the east side of the 1800 blk Broad St. This will help revitalize an area that is in desperate need of it! Also if they do build in the park, will there be ZERO surface parking?
There was talk of them building a new hockey arena they could easily build that along with a new office tower head quarters they have the money
     
     
  #8049  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 2:00 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
There was talk of them building a new hockey arena they could easily build that along with a new office tower head quarters they have the money
They were never going to build a new hockey arena. The most they/the Pats owners would do is propose one and ask for money (or finagle some out of taxpayers through a few more shady provincial land transactions... allegedly), but that ship has sailed with the new Stadium. I doubt any money other than upgrades/maintenance will go toward large sporting facilities for the next decade.

The facilities do seem to be pretty well staggered though. The Brandt Centre will probably need a major overhaul or replacement in 15 years or so. Then 15-20 years after that, Mosaic will probably need a refurb (as long as it's been well-maintained during the preceding years).
     
     
  #8050  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 3:50 PM
J-Walker J-Walker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodo Regina Lover View Post
I have a suggestion for Brandt, why not build your new building on the east side of the 1800 blk Broad St. This will help revitalize an area that is in desperate need of it! Also if they do build in the park, will there be ZERO surface parking?
Haha, right. The reason they won't do that is for the same reason that if you were going to build an expensive brand new house and you had the choice of building on a lot across from a beautiful park in the Crescents neighborhood, or a lot on a run down street in an undesirable area, which would you choose if it was your money?
     
     
  #8051  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 4:33 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
The facilities do seem to be pretty well staggered though. The Brandt Centre will probably need a major overhaul or replacement in 15 years or so. Then 15-20 years after that, Mosaic will probably need a refurb (as long as it's been well-maintained during the preceding years).
The next one needs to be replacement of the Lawson. The work 4 years ago was really not enough for long term. There aren't enough pool facilities in the city (ask anyone who has tried to register kids for swimming on the opening day of registration) and the user groups competing for time at the Lawson are getting squeezed.
     
     
  #8052  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 5:04 PM
PhotoJim PhotoJim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
The next one needs to be replacement of the Lawson. The work 4 years ago was really not enough for long term. There aren't enough pool facilities in the city (ask anyone who has tried to register kids for swimming on the opening day of registration) and the user groups competing for time at the Lawson are getting squeezed.
So replacement doesn't seem the solution. Adding an additional facility seems the solution.
     
     
  #8053  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 6:09 PM
pappcam pappcam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoJim View Post
So replacement doesn't seem the solution. Adding an additional facility seems the solution.
Maybe an indoor water park/pool type place that any city in Canada that's a city should have?
     
     
  #8054  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 6:11 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
I’ve always thought we needed a new main large swimming/waterslide city facility. Lots of Glass (surprise) and something central.

Something like Toronto’s Regent Park new facility...

     
     
  #8055  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2018, 6:30 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by pappcam View Post
Maybe an indoor water park/pool type place that any city in Canada that's a city should have?
Wasn't that in the long term facility plan (in the "within the next 20 years" category)?
     
     
  #8056  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2018, 12:00 AM
Draftsman Draftsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 989
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoJim View Post
So replacement doesn't seem the solution. Adding an additional facility seems the solution.
Well! There's a use for the hole at Victoria and Albert! The Capital Pointe Water Park. No excavation needed!
     
     
  #8057  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2018, 2:25 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draftsman View Post
Well! There's a use for the hole at Victoria and Albert! The Capital Pointe Water Park. No excavation needed!
     
     
  #8058  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2018, 3:56 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
https://regina.ctvnews.ca/mobile/video?clipId=576787 Talking of a new hockey arena the rumours are out there , this is the best place for a new arena

Last edited by thefourthtower; Mar 24, 2018 at 5:44 PM.
     
     
  #8059  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2018, 4:22 PM
Davidson Davidson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Highway 11
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drofmab View Post
It's an absolutely ridiculous idea - unless the province is planning to establish an ongoing funding commitment to compensate the City for the burden they're assuming (and hope that the City forgets the Province reneged on the Crown taxes-in-lieu after memories faded).

I guess if the prov were interested in winding-down the GTH as an entity, and transferring the land to the City (at no cost), that's an option worth exploring... but virtually anything else - why? There's already been enough offloading/downloading from the Prov to the City... why would the City volunteer to take on additional expensive provincial albatross like the GTH (much less pay the Province for the privilege of taking it on)? Why? It's a money-loser, it stands no chance of being anything more than an industrial park. Chasing major tenants is a shell game that we're bound to lose.

Glad to see the Mayor's initial comments weren't exactly enthusiastic, but I would've taken the opportunity to present the City's opening volley - the City will only contemplate taking a limited role, and only in a manner that guarantees a return. Basically, a fee-for-service (with a profit included) for assuming the management (not ownership) of the land on behalf of the Province.
I may be dating myself and perhaps my memory is foggy, but wasn't this initially a City of Regina project called the Regina Intermodal facility or something similar to move the CP yards and STC bus depot out our downtown? And then the business wizards of the prov'l gov't came along with stars and $$$ in their eyes, took control and rebranded it the GTH? And now they want to dump this white elephant back on the city? Fougere should tell them to take a hike
__________________
Life is a Highway (11)
     
     
  #8060  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2018, 5:15 PM
Regina Boi Regina Boi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidson View Post
I may be dating myself and perhaps my memory is foggy, but wasn't this initially a City of Regina project called the Regina Intermodal facility or something similar to move the CP yards and STC bus depot out our downtown? And then the business wizards of the prov'l gov't came along with stars and $$$ in their eyes, took control and rebranded it the GTH? And now they want to dump this white elephant back on the city? Fougere should tell them to take a hike
If one dollar of tax payer money goes into this, you all should be prepared to revolt against Fougere and council! lol
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:52 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.