Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
It's a shame to lose older affordable apartments like that, thank Vision for the gold rush they set off with the West End plan. I am surprised through that the UDP would criticize the lack of retail in the new proposal when there is none there now, Do we really need yet another strip of streetcar retail?
|
They're just swapping older affordable apartments for new, energy efficient affordable apartments. There will only be a temporary loss while construction occurs.
Agreed on the retail comment - there's apparently already more retail in the West End than seems to be needed (from the vacant storefronts). It's not like you would have to go far to find a store or a coffee shop. Maybe the comment reflects the difficulty of designing a good interface between residential uses and the street, rather than needing any more retail there?