Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina
Not a complaint or anything...
But 5 years is hardly "temporary."
Given the state of the RE market houses get built, torn down, and rebuilt again in the time frames that the City describes as temporary.
Just to be clear though again - not a complaint, just an observation.
|
Not just five years, but five plus the option to extend another five years, if I'm now reading correctly.
If the city were to guarantee the removal after a set time frame, then their claim of being temporary could be taken at face value. Otherwise they're just blowing smoke and hoping people won't mind or care.