Quote:
Originally Posted by Stenar
Residential wouldn't necessarily be sprawl. The original 2009 master plan had dense village and town centers.
|
No but the extension of residential services, retail, and entertainment would encourage it. If we focus those things downtown rather than spread them out there is a greater incentive to live in close proximity to the core. The port would encourage some sprawl, into Tooelle for instance, but not as much as it would if there were retail, restaurants, theatres etc out there.
I think we should leave that area for industrial uses and adjust our zoning to encourage greater densification in existing neighborhoods. One area that could be addressed is the lot size minimums in Glendale and Poplar Grove. I don't think those areas will suffer by having similar lot sizes as some of the city's best neighborhoods. In fact allowing for subdivision of large lots would likely end up being a boon for low income families that own a home out there. They could trade lawn for a neighbor and pay off their home in the process.