The
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkway
This topic came up over in the Liberty Property Camden thread: The Wells Fargo Center turned 20 this year. As these sorts of venues go the life span is about 30 years. What are your thoughts on a replacement venue for the good old Farg? Should it be at the sports complex? Should the Flyers and Sixers have different homes?
|
This idea that arenas have a 30 year lifespan is outdated. The arenas built in the 50s - 80s had a 30 year life span, but a lot of that has to do with the fact that by the time the 90s rolled around they were woefully inadequate in certain aspects that had become critically important for sports teams, namely wide concourses that enables the sale of lots of food and souvenirs and plentiful club boxes. The Spectrum had neither of these amenities and thus needed to be replaced. But in the past 30 years there has not been a similar radical change in the design of Arenas. The Flyers actually just renovated their club boxes and the WFC is still world class and should remain the home of the Flyers for the foreseeable future.
That's not even mentioning the fact that the construction of arenas and stadiums has not proved to be the economic boon that many claimed and taxpayers are increasingly opposed to government subsidies to construct them. So yeah, get used to the WFC, it's not going anywhere anytime soon.
As myself and others pointed out though, the Sixers are apparently none the less interested in building an arena for the simple fact that they don't own the Wells Fargo Center, the Flyers do. The arena while built for hockey and basketball is better suited for hockey and the Sixers have ongoing disputes regarding the arena naming rights and other issues. Having their own arena would increase the value of the Sixers considerably if Harris decides to sell them and it would allow him to make more money in the meantime.
So discussing the future home of the Sixers is fun because they likely will move to build a new arena in the near future. Also, while I was against locating Phillies or Eagles downtown as I believe downtown stadiums are overrated. There are far fewer issues with a downtown basketball arena as well as more benefits. This could be an exciting development to look forward to.
Also re: skyscraper: talk about the Sixers being terrible as a factor in such a long range decision is silly. The Sixers won't be terrible forever and their crowds are not ever-dwindling, attendance is way up this year. In case you didn't know one of the most exciting prospects of the past few decades is now playing for the Sixers and another major prospect should debut in a month or so. Sixers future looks very bright. And Sixers have no interest in building an arena that the Phantoms could play in. Makes literally no sense as much of their motivation behind this is to build a dedicated basketball arena.