HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7761  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2016, 11:25 PM
ajiuO's Avatar
ajiuO ajiuO is offline
A.K.A. Vigo
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor View Post
In Cleveland this week talking to potential investors on a project in Salt Lake City. Thoughts on a design concept like this? It would be a corner parcel, and would be a bit longer on each side and stepped down from 5 to 3 on one side.

This is just an image I pulled off the web as an example. Suggestions?
I would say it depends on the area. There are certain areas that I would be Okay with something like that and certain areas that I wouldn't.

Not sure why... but that kind of reminds me of the building on 200s and 500w... also is that the style of cladding that you intend to use? That would also change what areas I would find it acceptable... I'm sure that you have to be very vague at this point... but depending on what corner you're talking about, I would say sure... I would never put something like that on South Temple... but on the other hand I think it would be a great fit for somewhere in the 7th to 9th south & 3erd W. to State St. area... Those are just two examples there are other options on both sides.

__________________
On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a
throne of blood! What was will be! What is will be no more! Now is the season of evil!
     
     
  #7762  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2016, 11:27 PM
ajiuO's Avatar
ajiuO ajiuO is offline
A.K.A. Vigo
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,998
That also might be something interesting that could go on W. North Temple somewhere...
__________________
On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a
throne of blood! What was will be! What is will be no more! Now is the season of evil!
     
     
  #7763  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2016, 11:57 PM
asies1981 asies1981 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,173
     
     
  #7764  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 8:08 AM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian View Post
Yeah I wasn't asking if it was a possible venue for the Stars as you had envisioned it. I was suggesting an idea with a possible ready tenant, that would also be a useful auxiliary space for the Salt Palace, and that could also be used as an entertainment venue(concerts and what not). The demand for what you may think of as lowbrow entertainment is much much higher than the demand for theatrical productions, sorry it just is.

I'm not sure that the SL market will, at this time, absorb more than what already exists and is currently being built. In time I'm sure that we will get another theatre but I hope that that block is fully developed before then.
Lowbrow works too. The point is to get the infrastructure in there while we can, and while there's still space to put it. Having a theater district requires a critical mass of theaters, so when one auditorium is transitioning shows, another has a show running. This way, there is little downtime for entertainment offerings.

To offer an answer to wether or not the salt lake market can absorb more than what already exists, a large argument for the UPAC was: theater begatts more theater, and I would add to that any sort of live performance.

Minneapolis is a good example. Even though St. Paul has comparable venues of a similar capacity to Salt Lake City, Minneapolis has six large theaters, seven including their symphony hall, eight including the auditorium at the UofM (similar to Kingsburry Hall). If you got rid of St. Paul and its portion of the metro, Minneapolis metro would be similar in size to Salt Lake's metro. If they can support eight venues for the performing arts in their downtown, not to mention the dozen or so neighborhood theaters, we can arguably support eight as well. Especially if placed adjacent to our convention center (something Minneapolis does not have going for them).
     
     
  #7765  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 12:39 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,661
Old & New, I know Minneapolis is a good sized city. You said that without St. Paul, the greater Minneapolis Metro would be the same size as Salt Lake Metro. Did you mean just the Salt Lake Valley portion per se, or the entire Wasatch Front? I'm wondering because the Minneapolis portion is much larger than the St. Paul portion...right?

Also, what constitutes a large theatre as far as seating capacity. I ask out of curiosity, and you seem to be very familiar with the stats. Would we be including theaters such as the New Hale in Sandy, etc.? Particularly if we're talking the entire Wasatch Front, from Ogden to Provo.

There is nothing more exciting to me at this juncture, than to see the old Utah Theatre restored. I would be over the top excited if they would also open a film school on that block. Only a dream, but wouldn't it be great if the US Bank moved to another tower, and the film school took up the vacated space?
     
     
  #7766  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 1:18 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,106
The only way that the idea would work is if we move the Rose Wagner theater from 3rd South to this location.

I don't think that it is possible though. By this weekend, there will be 3 large options for performances all in roughly 1 block from the Convention Center:

Capitol, Rose Wagner, and Eccles. The Rose Wagner is the smallest of the 3 with just under 800 seats total across the main theater area and the smaller venue options inside.

Additionally, there is a "Thrust" stage in the main Rose Wagner theater, it isn't as large as some but it is there.

Also, it is used for smaller meetings for some conventions. Most conventions that have larger meetings need between 1,700 seats and 12,000 seats. In these cases, they have been using the Capitol, Internal seating options in the Convention Center as well as the arena (Delta, ESA, Vivint, etc).

I do like the idea of additional theaters in close proximity, we do have to remember that there are/shortly will be 3 operating in less than a 2 block radius of each other and a 4th when the Utah Theater is updated and running again.

The problem with the theater location shown is that it is also in the main Convention Center hotel district. To be viable in the location, we would need at least 2 large hotels near the theater. CCH and another 800+ hotel to attract larger conventions. The theater outlined would need to be marketed to conventions first until the population of both the Metro but primarily the City increases enough to support it as an arts venue first rather than a convention meeting venue.

That being said, I think that if a Developer wanted to develop the current Rose Wagner location, moving it to this location would work, provided a hotel was also attached due to the increase in size of the theater.
     
     
  #7767  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 8:26 PM
airportvids airportvids is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 155
     
     
  #7768  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 8:33 PM
stayinginformed stayinginformed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by airportvids View Post
The mixing of drinks is 'sacred, not secret'.
     
     
  #7769  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 8:51 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by airportvids View Post
#justoneofsomanyreasons
     
     
  #7770  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 10:32 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Old & New, I know Minneapolis is a good sized city. You said that without St. Paul, the greater Minneapolis Metro would be the same size as Salt Lake Metro. Did you mean just the Salt Lake Valley portion per se, or the entire Wasatch Front? I'm wondering because the Minneapolis portion is much larger than the St. Paul portion...right?

Also, what constitutes a large theatre as far as seating capacity. I ask out of curiosity, and you seem to be very familiar with the stats. Would we be including theaters such as the New Hale in Sandy, etc.? Particularly if we're talking the entire Wasatch Front, from Ogden to Provo.

There is nothing more exciting to me at this juncture, than to see the old Utah Theatre restored. I would be over the top excited if they would also open a film school on that block. Only a dream, but wouldn't it be great if the US Bank moved to another tower, and the film school took up the vacated space?
The Wasatch front 4 counties are 2.4 million now. It's difficult to say if Minneapolis or St Paul is bigger when you take Stillwater MN into account, which is on the St Paul side. But if you split the metro in half, you get about 1.9 population.

In my mind, a large theater has more than a 1,000 Seats. St. Paul has two, soon to be three: the Ordway, (2,206) and the Fitzgerald (1,050). They are also refurbishing the palace theater (2,800): http://www.startribune.com/take-a-look-i...e-a-major-concert-destination/369439772/. Additionally, they also have the stepping stone children's theater (430). For an equivalent to the New Hale in Sandy, Minneapolis also has Theater In The Round, which is also downtown: http://www.theatreintheround.org And for an equivalent to the Off Broadway Theater, Minneapolis has their Brave New Workshop Comedy Theater downtown.

I'm also super excited to see the Pantages/Utah Theater restored!!! Minneapolis restored theirs about a decade ago. National Touring Comedy acts, book readings, those types of shows that don't require a lot of scenery go there because, just like the Pantages theater in Salt Lake City, the one in Minneapolis has a shallow stage. They were both built for Vaudeville performances which were a dozen one act variety shows, that didn't require elaborate scene changes. A film venue with an accompanying film school would also be a great fit IMO. Current talks are that the Pantages/Utah may become a dinner theater. But I don't think we'll hear much about it until June 2017.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makid View Post
The only way that the idea would work is if we move the Rose Wagner theater from 3rd South to this location.

I don't think that it is possible though. By this weekend, there will be 3 large options for performances all in roughly 1 block from the Convention Center:

Capitol, Rose Wagner, and Eccles. The Rose Wagner is the smallest of the 3 with just under 800 seats total across the main theater area and the smaller venue options inside.

Additionally, there is a "Thrust" stage in the main Rose Wagner theater, it isn't as large as some but it is there.

Also, it is used for smaller meetings for some conventions. Most conventions that have larger meetings need between 1,700 seats and 12,000 seats. In these cases, they have been using the Capitol, Internal seating options in the Convention Center as well as the arena (Delta, ESA, Vivint, etc).

I do like the idea of additional theaters in close proximity, we do have to remember that there are/shortly will be 3 operating in less than a 2 block radius of each other and a 4th when the Utah Theater is updated and running again.

The problem with the theater location shown is that it is also in the main Convention Center hotel district. To be viable in the location, we would need at least 2 large hotels near the theater. CCH and another 800+ hotel to attract larger conventions. The theater outlined would need to be marketed to conventions first until the population of both the Metro but primarily the City increases enough to support it as an arts venue first rather than a convention meeting venue.

That being said, I think that if a Developer wanted to develop the current Rose Wagner location, moving it to this location would work, provided a hotel was also attached due to the increase in size of the theater.
I see the Rose Wagner theater taking on a similar role to the Cowles Center theater in downtown Minneapolis which is home to modern dance companies. Today, there are already dance companies, including Ririe Woodburry, who use the Rose Wagner quite a lot.

A thrust theater provides a very different experience than does a proscenium theater like the main Rose Wagner auditorium. In a thrust theater, the audience surrounds the action on three sides.

The new Eccles theater, though close enough in my opinion, does not meet the proximity requirements for a convention theater. They measure by feet, not by blocks. Salt Lake City blocks are huge. I think Capitol is close enough, but the Rose Wagner is not. But I believe a theater directly across the street can be included in the overall square footage count of the convention center itself.

Each theater can cater to different performing arts events. Different types have different requirements, from seating capacity to format to fly/stage space.

Your strategy of: "The theater outlined would need to be marketed to conventions first until the population of both the Metro but primarily the City increases enough to support it as an arts venue first rather than a convention meeting venue," could be a great strategy if somehow it's proven that Salt Lake City can't support additional performing arts. But I think we want to plan for the future, and get the infrastructure in there asap, while there is space.

Last edited by Old&New; Oct 21, 2016 at 1:01 AM.
     
     
  #7771  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2016, 11:17 PM
Marvland's Avatar
Marvland Marvland is offline
SLC Lifer
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fairpark
Posts: 674
Quote:
Originally Posted by airportvids View Post
They could have very easily gotten a social club license. The dining club version would have been the right license. That's what happens when you contract a catering company to be a restaurant.
     
     
  #7772  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 4:24 AM
Liberty Wellsian Liberty Wellsian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old&New View Post
Lowbrow works too. The point is to get the infrastructure in there while we can, and while there's still space to put it. Having a theater district requires a critical mass of theaters, so when one auditorium is transitioning shows, another has a show running. This way, there is little downtime for entertainment offerings.

To offer an answer to wether or not the salt lake market can absorb more than what already exists, a large argument for the UPAC was: theater begatts more theater, and I would add to that any sort of live performance.

Minneapolis is a good example. Even though St. Paul has comparable venues of a similar capacity to Salt Lake City, Minneapolis has six large theaters, seven including their symphony hall, eight including the auditorium at the UofM (similar to Kingsburry Hall). If you got rid of St. Paul and its portion of the metro, Minneapolis metro would be similar in size to Salt Lake's metro. If they can support eight venues for the performing arts in their downtown, not to mention the dozen or so neighborhood theaters, we can arguably support eight as well. Especially if placed adjacent to our convention center (something Minneapolis does not have going for them).
I don't view downtown SLC as a place that will be running out of space anytime soon. We also have a lot of crap that will be removed at some point. Parking lot blocks and parking garages, Carl's Jr., and a lot of meh that is going up now. Beyond that City Creek at some point could possibly house a theatre. I'm not worried about running out of space at all.
     
     
  #7773  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 6:11 AM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian View Post
I don't view downtown SLC as a place that will be running out of space anytime soon. We also have a lot of crap that will be removed at some point. Parking lot blocks and parking garages, Carl's Jr., and a lot of meh that is going up now. Beyond that City Creek at some point could possibly house a theatre. I'm not worried about running out of space at all.
The Cultural arts/theater district, right now, is made up of the two blocks directly south of City Creek Center. There really aren't many spaces left on the west block where a new theater could serve both the theater district and the convention center. Additionally, demolition is expensive, and theater projects are usually underfunded. But with an open space like this, where most of the demolition has already occurred, it provides a great opportunity.
     
     
  #7774  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 2:38 PM
Marvland's Avatar
Marvland Marvland is offline
SLC Lifer
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fairpark
Posts: 674
     
     
  #7775  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 5:35 PM
msbutah's Avatar
msbutah msbutah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 140
Regent as of this morning
     
     
  #7776  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 5:46 PM
Liberty Wellsian Liberty Wellsian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 810
Jackie Biskupsi v City Council

I'm ready for Biskupski to go already.

Kitchen seems like he would make for a good Mayor from what I have seen.
     
     
  #7777  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 8:50 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian View Post
Jackie Biskupsi v City Council

I'm ready for Biskupski to go already.

Kitchen seems like he would make for a good Mayor from what I have seen.
I agree with Jackie on this one.
     
     
  #7778  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 9:07 PM
Liberty Wellsian Liberty Wellsian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old&New View Post
I agree with Jackie on this one.
What part of her non-plan do you agree with? Srsly, there's nothing there. This city seemed to be moving in the right direction but Jackie keeps shifting into neutral.
     
     
  #7779  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 9:47 PM
s.p.hansen's Avatar
s.p.hansen s.p.hansen is offline
Exurb Enjoyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Great Salt Lake, Utah
Posts: 2,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old&New View Post
I agree with Jackie on this one.
She's a bad mayor. Ralph should run again; he'd win easily now.
     
     
  #7780  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2016, 9:58 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian View Post
What part of her non-plan do you agree with? Srsly, there's nothing there. This city seemed to be moving in the right direction but Jackie keeps shifting into neutral.
Why is the city council plucking money from RDA projects? If other cities are going to ship their homeless here, then the federal government better foot the bill for the programming and infrastructure to house them. Otherwise we need to ship those who came here homeless back from whence they came.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.