HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4881  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:09 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
City council voted against the owners of 13 Leopold Cres. They aren't getting that house off the protected list. (Moral of the story here might be not to buy a house that is protected when the current owners won't let you have a home inspection.) LP says this is the third time the city has voted against the wishes of the owner. Anyone know what the other two are?

http://leaderpost.com/storyline/in-a-rar...in-favour-of-protecting-an-historic-home

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchew...look-different-after-unveiling-1.2984056
Wow that's really unconscionable on behalf of council. I will be contacting my councilor about this.

If I were the owner I'd driving a bulldozer through it right now and pay fines later.
     
     
  #4882  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:11 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
I for one will welcome the Save-on-Foods. The closest grocery store is that dicey looking No-Frills on 4th Ave. Next closest is Safeway at Cathedral or an Extra Foods and Normanview.
I'm sure some people would love it, the problem is that Westerra is going to be a desert with very little other residential around it.
     
     
  #4883  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:00 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
I can't imagine those hotels being successful, even with the bypass in the general vicinity.

I also wouldn't think that Save-On would want their second location to be there, but maybe they don't want to wait for the NW or East to be available.

Wal-Mart has looked in this area as well, but I'm not sure if that went anywhere.

This site will be the hardest retail sell in the city.
My recollection was that WalMart was looking at the First Nation's land on the north side of Dewdney. I forget which FN but they had a mention of a partnership with a national developer for their site.
     
     
  #4884  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:02 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Wow that's really unconscionable on behalf of council. I will be contacting my councilor about this.

If I were the owner I'd driving a bulldozer through it right now and pay fines later.
Pretty scary that that Council can do this to you, especially where the architectural value of that place is iffy.
     
     
  #4885  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:05 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Udon'tknow View Post
Well the copper on the Globe Theater building turned green, no idea when, Urban Climates google photo is proof!
I believe it was always green. It must have a different chemical make up. All the other copper roofs are black including the Hotel Sk, MJ City Hall and the Bess.
     
     
  #4886  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 3:23 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Wow that's really unconscionable on behalf of council. I will be contacting my councilor about this.

If I were the owner I'd driving a bulldozer through it right now and pay fines later.
And really, if they just tore it down and built a really nice new home there, the resale value of the new home would more than make up for any fines imposed I would imagine. The only problem they would run into would be if the city took them to court mid-demolition and the court ordered them to stop (which could then result in contempt charges if they continued).
     
     
  #4887  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 3:27 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus View Post
And really, if they just tore it down and built a really nice new home there, the resale value of the new home would more than make up for any fines imposed I would imagine. The only problem they would run into would be if the city took them to court mid-demolition and the court ordered them to stop (which could then result in contempt charges if they continued).
The City could levy fines well into the six figures. Trying to be head strong with a government is just asking for trouble.
     
     
  #4888  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 3:36 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,979
Not sure if this render of Connaught School has been posted:




http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchew...nstructions-underway-in-regina-1.3469504
     
     
  #4889  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 4:45 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Pretty scary that that Council can do this to you, especially where the architectural value of that place is iffy.
I smell smoke....does anyone else smell smoke? Just don't buy insurance on the place or they will be in a whole new world of trouble.

Seriouslly though, I don' think it helped that the owners appeared to thumb their nose at the heritage status of the property at every step from buying without an inspection (who does that?) to basically openly stating they always intented to demolish the place. I'm somewhat sympathetic but not really. Had they approached this differently they may have been successful. Council had the choice of approving this and admitting the bylaw was meaningless or denying it. I don't think the heritage value of the property (none) had much to do with the decision.

They can always put the place back on the market.........and allow potential buyers to do inspections so that they might factor in the costs of rehab.
     
     
  #4890  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:02 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Not sure if this render of Connaught School has been posted:




http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchew...nstructions-underway-in-regina-1.3469504
Looks really nice. I like the incorporation of brick especially.
     
     
  #4891  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:02 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Not sure if this render of Connaught School has been posted:




http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchew...nstructions-underway-in-regina-1.3469504

And hopefully the development right across the street gets approval too!
     
     
  #4892  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 7:39 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I believe it was always green. It must have a different chemical make up. All the other copper roofs are black including the Hotel Sk, MJ City Hall and the Bess.
The Old City Hall has been green since 1972. (Shhhh, I am dating myself --- yes, I was 6 years old at the time.) I thought it looked fascinating from the 7th floor of the Medical & Dental Building.

Last edited by SkydivePilot; Mar 1, 2016 at 9:20 PM.
     
     
  #4893  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 7:51 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
The Old City Hall has been green since 1972. (Shhhh, I am dating myself --- yes I was 6 years old at the time.) I thought it looked fascinating from the 7th floor of the Medical & Dental Building.
As with the old post card of the Leg dome , it is impossible to tell if this hand tinting is accurate. Looks like the 20's

     
     
  #4894  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:28 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
My recollection was that WalMart was looking at the First Nation's land on the north side of Dewdney. I forget which FN but they had a mention of a partnership with a national developer for their site.
After new band elections that idea cratered with great prejudice.
     
     
  #4895  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:30 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
I smell smoke....does anyone else smell smoke? Just don't buy insurance on the place or they will be in a whole new world of trouble.

Seriouslly though, I don' think it helped that the owners appeared to thumb their nose at the heritage status of the property at every step from buying without an inspection (who does that?) to basically openly stating they always intented to demolish the place. I'm somewhat sympathetic but not really. Had they approached this differently they may have been successful. Council had the choice of approving this and admitting the bylaw was meaningless or denying it. I don't think the heritage value of the property (none) had much to do with the decision.

They can always put the place back on the market.........and allow potential buyers to do inspections so that they might factor in the costs of rehab.
I'd give it the Travellers' Building treatment. Remove all the windows and let it sit. Maybe tear off the roof and "forget" to put it back on.

They could get you on bylaw infractions, but their enforcement is limited and slow.
     
     
  #4896  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 12:01 AM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
I'd give it the Travellers' Building treatment. Remove all the windows and let it sit. Maybe tear off the roof and "forget" to put it back on.

They could get you on bylaw infractions, but their enforcement is limited and slow.
I just can't see the Dodds wanting two mortgages, regardless of their income. This past year of sitting there abandoned - paying the mortgage and taxes - will have been painful enough.
     
     
  #4897  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 12:30 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
I just can't see the Dodds wanting two mortgages, regardless of their income. This past year of sitting there abandoned - paying the mortgage and taxes - will have been painful enough.
They probably paid cash for the new house and are planning on getting a construction mortgage for the build.
     
     
  #4898  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 1:49 AM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I believe it was always green. It must have a different chemical make up. All the other copper roofs are black including the Hotel Sk, MJ City Hall and the Bess.
You think the original state was a green copper? Looks like oxidation to me, maybe a different kind of copper but I doubt it was always green.

     
     
  #4899  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 1:55 AM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Pretty scary that that Council can do this to you, especially where the architectural value of that place is iffy.
It will be interesting to see if the city takes a similar stand on older buildings in the downtown, which would have more architectural significance and history than this house. For example, the two buildings that currently sit on the site the could eventually be Havard tower 4. Both buildings are attractive architecturally, with some unique architecture features, the angled corner on the law building and the metal lion heads on the building beside it. Something tells me that if Havard comes along and wants to demolish those buildings claiming they are in a state beyond repair the city won't stop them. And yet they stop an individual from knocking down an ugly house.
     
     
  #4900  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 5:08 AM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
Has there ever been a formal application or rumblings of a proposal for the section of land that is the former Bay Parkade (now parking) off of Victoria Avenue across from Atlantis?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.