HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2016, 1:40 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migs View Post
Completely disagree. Funny you only take into account the zig zag portion of the cladding (which I do think looks good & that much of IGF is cladded with similar material) & fail to mention the significant amount of Tyndall stone throughout, mesh metal cladding that will look spectacular as well as the significant amount of glass wall on the east, west, & north portions of the stadium.

Miserable people dwell on their perceived negatives & refuse to acknowledge the positives, to each their own.
The cladding is bad. No, not bad, an affront to humanity. The rough-hewn Tyndall is bad. And the roofing material is inferior.

The only reason the stadium isn't a complete failure is that Pattern had a superior design basic layout and planning which HKS had to work with. The quality between the two projects isn't even close.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.