Quote:
Originally Posted by DMTower
The airport line Trax station is just on the north side of the Salt Palace, and it's an uninterrupted, pretty short walk down to the south end of the CC. They don't even have to cross a street. It's really not an inconvenience at all for visitors.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor
I completely agree with DM, on the Temple Square Trax stop, the walk to the south end of the SP isn't that far, due to the fact that there is no street to interrupt the walk. It's not going to be a horrible walk, they are greeted by new Abravanel Plaza, MOCA has a bit of engagement and interaction with banners and displays of current and upcoming exhibits. They then are engaged by the Main entrance to the SP promoting their convention. As soo as they pass the entrance the hotel is just a few steps away. It's not always about the actual distance someone has to walk, but the visual engagement that occurs on that walk. Not to mention they walked much further than that from their airport gate to the Trax stop anyway.
|
All fair points. It wouldn't be a terrible walk, but it would be a
walk, and just that point alone can taint first impressions. Rather than having TRAX door-to-door service, it would require an extra step (or to be punny, 1,200 feet worth of extra steps!) for arriving visitors. Add to that the 100 degree heat in the summer, the snow and cold in the winter, or the off-chance of precipitation, and what would be a happy 'I'm so glad I'm back in Salt Lake City!' becomes an 'ugh, back to this place again.'
It's a small issue, and I'll shut up about it right after this post is done, but I'm just trying to minimize complaints. People will complain about everything, sure, but the less reasons there are to complain about the better. And if we can build something that is better for the people who will actually use it, why make justifications to do it differently? In the end it's a standard cost-benefit decision. I just want to be clear on what the 'costs' are.