HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2015, 10:20 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by ByeByeBaby View Post
Nashville was at 1.7 million when they introduced their commuter rail. Austin was at 2.1 million when they introduced their commuter rail. Portland was at 2.3 million when they introduced their commuter rail. Minneapolis was at 3.6 million when they introduced their commuter rail.

And in all four cases, a huge capital cost has resulted in very modest (some would say pathetic) ridership.

If we're "treating" (ie pretending) towns and suburbs are small cities, why don't we just "treat" commuter buses as commuter trains instead, and then your suggestion has already been implemented for years.
Most of these USA projects are justified as 2000 people going each way removes a need to build an extra interstate lane along the route going each way. Changes the CBA a bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.