HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1801  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 3:19 AM
bflatflat9 bflatflat9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 308
Quote:
Originally Posted by asies1981 View Post
Post on a new petition calling for refineries to be moved.

As someone who has dedicated the past 7 months to covering development in the Salt Lake, I feel that city is indeed booming. I have traveled a lot and lived for 7 years in one of the densest cities in the US. I've said this before but the heart of a city is at the street level. Salt Lake's downtown is seeing new life and new spaces that engage the street level and are bringing people downtown. There is a huge influx of mid-rise residential (and more on the way) in the periphery of downtown. These new projects bring density and people that will spend their evenings and weekends frequenting downtown establishments. To me the influx of mid-rise residential and needed infill is more an auspicious determiner then a 50-story building. People don't move to a city because it has a building over 50-stories. People move to the city because of its energy, walk-ability, transit, jobs and nightlight. Salt Lake is headed in the right direction in all of those areas listed. We will get a 50-story building sooner than later, but we can't forget that we have three skyscrapers that we know will be built in the next few years and there is a lot of residential coming into the city. Salt Lake is booming, the growth is just being spread out a bit, which in the end will make it a far more interesting city, than any 500-foot building can.
Well said, and awesome blog.
Thank you.
     
     
  #1802  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 4:09 AM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatman View Post
Old & New, I think that's your best plan yet. I would only add a pedestrian connection of some kind (a bridge, maybe?) from the south end of the expansion to the south end of the existing section, so that conventioneers can circulate in, well, a circle.

I really hope the right decision makers get a chance to see your work.
Here you go:


     
     
  #1803  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 5:00 AM
Hatman's Avatar
Hatman Hatman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,434
Perfect! Sign me up!
     
     
  #1804  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 10:24 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by asies1981 View Post
Post on a new petition calling for refineries to be moved.

As someone who has dedicated the past 7 months to covering development in the Salt Lake, I feel that city is indeed booming. I have traveled a lot and lived for 7 years in one of the densest cities in the US. I've said this before but the heart of a city is at the street level. Salt Lake's downtown is seeing new life and new spaces that engage the street level and are bringing people downtown. There is a huge influx of mid-rise residential (and more on the way) in the periphery of downtown. These new projects bring density and people that will spend their evenings and weekends frequenting downtown establishments. To me the influx of mid-rise residential and needed infill is more an auspicious determiner then a 50-story building. People don't move to a city because it has a building over 50-stories. People move to the city because of its energy, walk-ability, transit, jobs and nightlight. Salt Lake is headed in the right direction in all of those areas listed. We will get a 50-story building sooner than later, but we can't forget that we have three skyscrapers that we know will be built in the next few years and there is a lot of residential coming into the city. Salt Lake is booming, the growth is just being spread out a bit, which in the end will make it a far more interesting city, than any 500-foot building can.
Thank you Isaac. Your weigh in is most welcome on the subject. While I share some of the frustration of those who are impatient for new tallest, I think most of us agree that Salt Lake City and it's gorgeous linear metro is filling in at a rate that is among the fastest in the nation. If being at the top tier of lists like Brookings, Milken, Forbes and Money don't say boom, then what does? Also, the vast majority of us have voiced a strong preference for a dense, vibrant, curbside attractive CBD and urban nodes NOW, with new tallest to follow over a natural maturation of time. As many have pointed out, and I've seen it often first hand myself. There are many attractive skylines from a distance, that reveal a very anemic vitality when standing in their core. Not only will they never have the Wasatch 'in your face stunning setting', but they don't have the portfolio of monumental historical architecture, or the palette of bones and infrastructure. This is particularly true between the Mississippi and West Coast.

I agree that much of the Wasatch vibrant growth is being generated by it's larger than average population of youngsters. However, it's a very positive sign that much of the upcoming local generation is able to find gainful employment in many areas of the local economy that will sustain a decent lifestyle. That is more than can be said for a large number of states. And for those of you who find it difficult to live on a mediocre salary, try doing it in California, as is the plight of many millions of Californians. The haves and have not's gap in places like California has become very wide.

Speaking of inward growth. Not that this is any kind of scientific statistic. Have any of you who frequent a gym noticed over the past ten years the major change in the makeup of homegrown members vs. newbies. I can't help but notice when I make runs to the Wasatch and work out at a local gym, how much the mix of transplants has increased. There's no more a sea of toe heads, but a major shift in variety of ethnicity and native origin. Native in the sense from other countries, but also other states. Again, I say this only because it has been so glaringly obvious to me, and my own origin of Mediterranean appearance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by asies1981 View Post
Post on a new petition calling for refineries to be moved.
Wow, moving the refineries!!! Now, that for me would be a long held dream come true. I have always resented with a passion their existence in that gateway location. As much as I would like to see the prison eventually moved, I would far rather the refineries be given a priority by the legislature over the prison. I would be curious to know though where exactly they're thinking they should be moved? Any of you who are more expert on energy refining have some ideas of the better suited locations. Should they go somewhere outside of Wendover? Maybe hidden out of site to the south and far west of a Nephi, or even Delta??

Also, anyone who can give me a reality check on the current power base of political representation for the refinery area? For example, say the prison area has, or the former Geneva site had a lot of political clout living in the back yard of their respective locations. Politicians living in Provo/Orem or So. Salt Lake/No. Utah Counties would be far more likely to push their agenda for their own back yard.

Another point. Would a Geneva/Prison style fantastical urban core be allowed to develop in that area? Are the proponents intent on making it pristinely empty? If they're not willing to make some kind of concessions to powerful development lobbies, then fat chance they'll get any kind of legislative force behind them. I say make the area a model of sustainable urban development, and even ironically LEED Certified.

On the other hand. Aren't they spending a fortune to pipe oil directly from the Uintah Basin to those refineries? Also, there's that major pipeline going from Salt Lake to Vegas? How does that effect the outcomes?

Let's get a healthy discussion going on this, and on this thread. It is most definitely a Salt Lake Development issue of major importance. I hope no one thinks we need to put this in a second tier energy thread!

Last edited by delts145; Jan 26, 2015 at 11:45 PM.
     
     
  #1805  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 11:48 AM
RC14's Avatar
RC14 RC14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,146
I don't think the Salt Lake City skyline will rise just because the valley "fills out."
I think a boom in high rise construction will require a reason for people to live or work downtown that will make it far more desirable than any other part of the valley.

For example, Chicago could probably expand outwardly forever but living in downtown Chicago provides a lifestyle that one can not find in the suburbs (which are more or less just like the suburbs of any other major city.)

I think creating more vibrant streets with ground floor retail and better entertainment and nightlife will help. I also think we need better transit oriented developments. I have been underwhelmed with what we call TODs here in Utah. I think most of them are just regular developments that happen to be near a TRAX line. I would like to see developers work with UTA to create developments truly "oriented" toward making public transit more convenient.

For Example, I live in the Citifront apartments. Citifront is located within walking distance of TRAX and Frountrunner. However, I feel like I'm living inside a fortress. I don't feel connected with the city at all. Just getting from my apartment to the outside of my complex feels like a hike. Maybe this makes me sound really lazy and their may be some truth to that, but I feel like developments need to be more ergonomic. It needs to feel natural to walk outside your apartment and get on the train or go to the market or nightclub.
     
     
  #1806  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 12:35 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
I think your only partially right, by your example of Citifront. While very true that there are still some newer midrise apartments/developments that don't engage, they are many that do. If we're only to go by Asie's very thorough accounting, the majority are very street friendly. Citifront was by chronology one of the first of this new generation, and yes not ideal. However, the influx that is now following is by and large a vast improvement.

Last edited by delts145; Jan 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM.
     
     
  #1807  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 5:19 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is online now
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,633
Salt Lake City has a very suburban mindset. It's why, even today, the residential development throughout the city is decidedly suburban. It's what other cities are seeing developed in their first-ring suburbs - not the heart of their downtown (on the whole, of course there are projects here and there). It's a good start, but it shows that SLC is probably 20-30 years behind much of its competition and because of that, we shouldn't expect the type of development that defines any comparable city - whether in the west or otherwise.

Hell, here in this very forum, one devoted to high-rise construction, you have Utahns defend the idea of taking low-rise, cookie-cutter four-story condos over, say, a fifteen-story high-rise residential tower. If supposed urban enthusiasts even here on SSP can't embrace higher living, what makes anyone think the casual local will? They won't.

So, SLC and its suburbs will continue developing the same type of residential infill for the foreseeable future until the mentality changes. As for going up, once we tap out, maybe ... but we're looking at decades from now and who knows what the growth patterns will be then.
     
     
  #1808  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 6:50 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas Snob View Post
BRAVO! Well, said. (Yes, I watch too much Downton Abbey).
Just because someone has posted more doesn't necessarily mean they have more intelligence (no offence intended), nor schooling, nor right to be "right". Opinions are like ass*****...everyone has one.
Spot on Dallas, especially in this case!

Last edited by delts145; Jan 26, 2015 at 11:01 PM.
     
     
  #1809  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 7:36 PM
LeVaJe LeVaJe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Smalltown, Utah
Posts: 30
I don't see how Comrade is sucking the life out of the foum. To me, the post just said that the suburban mentally needs to change before there will be much of a chance for really tall buildings. Maybe there needed to be more smileys.
__________________
-Level
     
     
  #1810  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 10:01 PM
SL,UT's Avatar
SL,UT SL,UT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westshire, WVC
Posts: 136
Here is an idea for the CCH. Salt Lake should buy the shuttered Fontainebleau Resort in Las Vegas, and transplant it here..... Seems legit!!!
     
     
  #1811  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 10:40 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
I love it, and from someone who actually puts their money where there mouth is. Definitely worth another repost.

Quote:
Originally Posted by asies1981 View Post
Post on a new petition calling for refineries to be moved.

As someone who has dedicated the past 7 months to covering development in the Salt Lake, I feel that city is indeed booming. I have traveled a lot and lived for 7 years in one of the densest cities in the US. I've said this before but the heart of a city is at the street level. Salt Lake's downtown is seeing new life and new spaces that engage the street level and are bringing people downtown. There is a huge influx of mid-rise residential (and more on the way) in the periphery of downtown. These new projects bring density and people that will spend their evenings and weekends frequenting downtown establishments. To me the influx of mid-rise residential and needed infill is more an auspicious determiner then a 50-story building. People don't move to a city because it has a building over 50-stories. People move to the city because of its energy, walk-ability, transit, jobs and nightlight. Salt Lake is headed in the right direction in all of those areas listed. We will get a 50-story building sooner than later, but we can't forget that we have three skyscrapers that we know will be built in the next few years and there is a lot of residential coming into the city. Salt Lake is booming, the growth is just being spread out a bit, which in the end will make it a far more interesting city, than any 500-foot building can.

Last edited by delts145; Jan 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM.
     
     
  #1812  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 11:09 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Time for some development news......

Agreement reached for $18M fairpark stadium
By Faith Heaton Jolley KSL.com

Real Salt Lake owner Dell Loy Hansen formed the minor league, elite lower-division Monarchs to bridge the gap between the Real Salt Lake major league soccer team and the club’s academy at the Grande Sports complex in Arizona, according to a Real Salt Lake news release.

During the inaugural 2015 Monarchs season, the team will play a 28-game regular season in the 12-team Western Conference with additional participation in the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup.

The new $18 million, 8,000-seat stadium will mainly be used for Monarchs games, but it will also host a variety of other events and teams including a concert series, a professional women’s soccer franchise, a men’s lacrosse and rugby franchise, and other community adult soccer games, the news release said. The Utah State Fair will also use the stadium for a three-week period during the annual fair.

More:
http://www.ksl.com/?sid=33246365&nid=148...d-for-18m-fairpark-stadium&s_cid=queue-3

Here's hoping this stadium goes up fast without any drama and that the Real Monarchs will have better luck at winning hardware unlike team A in Really 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 Luck ( RSL )
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #1813  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 11:27 PM
linguisize's Avatar
linguisize linguisize is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Time for some development news......

Agreement reached for $18M fairpark stadium
Wonderful! I hope all of these teams are able to draw a bit more foot traffic into that neighborhood; which it certainly doesn't have much of.
     
     
  #1814  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 11:54 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
This is great news. This is exactly the shot in the arm that the fairpark needs for further revitalization. Thank you Dell Loy Hansen!
     
     
  #1815  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2015, 11:54 PM
Ironweed Ironweed is offline
Ironweed
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 571
I think that both Delts and Comrade bring salient points in this discussion. Salt Lake has a lot of great things going for it. My sincere hope is that those that live here don't mess it up. I am not very confident at this point. The margin of error for planning for the future is razor thin.

I am all for the live/work/transit concept, particularly in our urban cores, which need to grow significantly. I noticed that Isaac had an article about such a development announced near the Liberty Park area. I believe we must have this type development on a far larger scale.

Delts is absolutely correct about many cities having much larger towers than Salt Lake and have terrible interaction at street level. I certainly would not want Salt Lake to follow that trend. It would just be nice for downtown to grow up a bit. Of course with the construction occurring due to viable demand.

Just a couple of weeks ago, For some nonsensical reason, I was listening to KSL radio (Which I really dislike by the way.) one day driving in my car, and some reporter was discussing a recent survey of Utahan's preferred living arrangements. Only 5% said that they would be comfortable or would prefer to live in an urban downtown environment. Over 90% indicated that they prefer living in a single family home with a large yard.

My blood was boiling of course. Then I hear from this forum that there is a possibility of a downsized convention hotel. There was also a discussion on air quality. So with these recent events I decided to vent on here (pun). I apologize if I have ruffled anyone's feathers.

I am utterly convinced that unless the people who live in Utah begin embracing a far more urban lifestyle, our quality of life will deteriorate dramatically. The geography of Utah will not allow for un-ending sprawl. Commuting time, air quality, stresses etc will all be affected negatively if we continue to embrace the existing development trends.

Bottom line, I simply do not appreciate short-sighted, simple mindedness, or myopic thinking that can often occur in Utah. We need to work together to ensure things work out for what is best for the State.

I did talk with former SL County Mayor Peter Carroon last night, and he does not think that the CCH will be downsized. Although he is not involved in its planning. It was interesting to get his perspective.
     
     
  #1816  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2015, 12:15 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,731
Thanks Ironweed for a much varied and reasonable post. Don't be too downhearted about what seems to be the current trend in Salt Lake's Metro. There is much to be positive about. The Wasatch Front continues to lead many cities in developing an excellent multi-pronged approach of transportation infrastructure. I think the Wasatch is embracing enthusiastically a new age of exciting urban cores, strategically placed throughout the metro. The new auto is also dramatically cleaner, and continues to improve quickly, giving us hope for an ever improving Wasatch Front. The Wasatch Front will march toward it's five million population mark during an era that is much smarter about it's planning than the many cities which have gone before it. Major Metros have reached that mark and much larger. They have survived, and continue to thrive. I am very positive that the Wasatch will take advantage of the hard learned lessons learned from Metros like L.A. as it becomes one of the nations future major Metros.

Last edited by delts145; Jan 27, 2015 at 12:29 AM.
     
     
  #1817  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2015, 12:24 AM
Twothirty8 Twothirty8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 59
Dear development nerds,

I would invite you all to the Clean Air Utah Rally at the State Capital on Saturday at 12pm. Our clean air issues are all based upon money, so how is it that Utah's big business doesn't see that our poor air is hindering economic growth and quality of life? Does big business even give a 🞵🞵🞵🞵? And, if Mexico City can make such dramatic changes to their air quality why and the hell can't Utah? Oh, that's right, money and politics.

Insider PAC news. I heard from a friend on the PAC development board that the parking garage on Regent St will have ground shops built into it, and their is a very good possibility that the lots across from Gallivan Center will be developed... I can only hope that little hideous yellow POS building will be torn down. But before it does I would like to have a public rock throwing/sledgehammer party.

Also, the PAC tower would be much further along if it weren't for someone pouring over 300sq ft of the wrong cement, which means that cement, etc is being dug up at the moment.

Other than that. Great work with the development news everyone. I'm super excited about the new Fairpark Stadium.

And Isaac, SLCity.org rules!
     
     
  #1818  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2015, 12:28 AM
slc801's Avatar
slc801 slc801 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Time for some development news......

Agreement reached for $18M fairpark stadium
By Faith Heaton Jolley KSL.com

Real Salt Lake owner Dell Loy Hansen formed the minor league, elite lower-division Monarchs to bridge the gap between the Real Salt Lake major league soccer team and the club’s academy at the Grande Sports complex in Arizona, according to a Real Salt Lake news release.

During the inaugural 2015 Monarchs season, the team will play a 28-game regular season in the 12-team Western Conference with additional participation in the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup.

The new $18 million, 8,000-seat stadium will mainly be used for Monarchs games, but it will also host a variety of other events and teams including a concert series, a professional women’s soccer franchise, a men’s lacrosse and rugby franchise, and other community adult soccer games, the news release said. The Utah State Fair will also use the stadium for a three-week period during the annual fair.

More:
http://www.ksl.com/?sid=33246365&nid=148...d-for-18m-fairpark-stadium&s_cid=queue-3

Here's hoping this stadium goes up fast without any drama and that the Real Monarchs will have better luck at winning hardware unlike team A in Really 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 Luck ( RSL )
One thing that I like about this deal is that it eliminates any possibility of moving the fair. The current site is, IMO, the best spot and I would hate to see it moved. The deal is contingent upon the fair's lease at the current site being extended for an additional 40 years. With the legislature convening today, we should hopefully hear this is a done deal by mid March at the latest, which is when the legislature concludes.

From the article above:

The term sheet is contingent on the State of Utah extending the Utah State Fairpark Corporation's lease on the Utah State Fairgrounds for an additional 40 years, according to the news release. The current lease expires in 2017.

"The only major hurdle to constructing the stadium is for the State to extend the lease on the Fairpark," Vice-Chairman of the Utah State Fairpark Board and former state senator Lowell Peterson said in the news release. "The stadium would be a huge step forward in revitalizing the entire Fairpark. We urge the State to extend the Fairpark Corporation's lease on the Fairpark, so we can preserve the Fairpark for generations to come.
     
     
  #1819  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2015, 12:46 AM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Rendering I found:

     
     
  #1820  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2015, 2:56 AM
linguisize's Avatar
linguisize linguisize is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twothirty8 View Post

Also, the PAC tower would be much further along if it weren't for someone pouring over 300sq ft of the wrong cement, which means that cement, etc is being dug up at the moment.
300 sq ft? How deep was it? Because 300sq ft can mean a lot of things depending on just how deep that section was. You didn't mean Cubic yards did you? Because if so; oh lawd...
(Concrete is generally measured in cubic yards.)

Any more details? I want to know what kind of error caused them to use the wrong concrete.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.