HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2014, 6:45 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2014, 7:18 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
^^^^^^
Not only those new towers, but just think what 400S. will look like in the next year or so with all the new midrise housing going up.
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2014, 8:20 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by jubguy3 View Post
99 West was built by a company based in portland that actually has some really great, clean designs. We ended up getting a much more complex building than I liked, same with Regent. The opposite happened on 111, lol. We can never find the right spot, except with 222, and thats why everyone likes that building - SOM did a really good job on 222. Complex but simple and reflective.

Does anyone have info on an expected heigh for the CCH?
Correction: 99 West was designed, not "built", by an architecture firm, ZGF, in Portland. Architects don't build buildings.
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2014, 8:25 PM
asies1981 asies1981 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,173
Several sections of the Yalecrest neighborhood are poised to become historic districts, hopefully this time the state legislature butts out, lol.
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2014, 11:41 PM
ToysNoiz's Avatar
ToysNoiz ToysNoiz is offline
Destroy 200 S. Carl's Jr.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 745
For those interested, I've updated the SLC 2014 photo thread. Link in my signature.





     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 10:59 AM
SLC2GeorgetownU's Avatar
SLC2GeorgetownU SLC2GeorgetownU is offline
SLC or BUST
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 54
My updated SLC skyline with 111 S Main, 151 State (Boyer), Cascade, AIR hotel, Convention tower, and tower 8. Hopefully this is a good representation of what the future SLC skyline will look like.















     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 2:55 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Great updates on the possible future skyline, except Air isn't in there as you mentioned.
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 5:00 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
A convention center hotel on RWP would be an awesome catalyst for that area of downtown!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC2GeorgetownU View Post
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 5:02 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Where's the Air Hotel?
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 6:00 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Where's the Air Hotel?
SLC2GeorgetownU, I think SLC Projects would like you to include the the Air Hotel ...as would I
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 6:58 PM
SLCdude's Avatar
SLCdude SLCdude is offline
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 836
Yesterday I saw a 360 degree photograph car (like the Google Street View cars) on main street, but for http://here.com/ ...which I did not know existed. It's a mapping company owned by Nokia. Their "street level" functions exactly like Google's "Street View". They do some really nice 3D modeling (not SLC yet though)
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2014, 11:52 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
I saw one for Bing recently as well.

Looks like everybody needs their own street view nowadays.
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 10:07 AM
jedikermit's Avatar
jedikermit jedikermit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,259
These Street View things have made stalking SO much easier.
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 4:54 PM
slc801's Avatar
slc801 slc801 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 120
I came across this really interesting article about the convention center hotel

Salt Lake convention hotel attracts developers

SALT LAKE CITY — Local firms and major real estate companies are among half a dozen developers interested in building a large convention hotel in the heart of Salt Lake City, a project that comes with $75 million in possible tax credits.

About 60 representatives of real estate developers, architects, construction firms and more attended a recent Salt Lake County meeting about the project, according to county records.

Of those, eight attendees indicated that their firms may submit an application with the county to develop the long-awaited hotel.


The project, estimated at $300 million, would provide needed hotel rooms and is key to the state's convention business, Utah leaders say. Any proposed hotel must be within 1,000 feet of the Salt Palace Convention Center and feature 800 to 1,000 rooms and meeting space.

Sharon Pierce, with Salt Lake County's contracts and procurement division, said no bid applications had been submitted as of late Friday afternoon. Pierce said she expects bids to come in closer to the Oct. 24 deadline.

Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams said he's pleased with the early interest.

"The hope is that this private hotel will bring additional conventions to Salt Lake," McAdams said. "We're getting inquiries already from conventions who have previously passed us over and are now giving us a second look."

One interested developer is Atlanta-based Portman Holdings, which has developed hotels on a similar scale in San Diego, Atlanta and Charlotte, North Carolina.

John Portman IV, a vice president of capital markets, told The Associated Press on Friday that his firm is considering submitting a bid. If selected, they could partner with a major hotel company such as Hilton, Marriott or Starwood, which includes hotel brands such as St. Regis and Sheraton, he said.

"I think there's six or seven that you want to probably look at for something of this size, that have this unique experience in managing all this meeting space and liaising with a major convention center," Portman said.

The Salt Lake City project would be the company's first foray into Utah, as it would be for another interested developer, Omni Hotels & Resorts.

Dallas-based Omni has developed comparable hotels of 600 and 800 rooms in Fort Worth, Texas, and Nashville, Tennessee, in recent years.

Charlie Muller, an acquisitions and development consultant with Omni, said the company will "definitely" submit a proposal.

"We're excited about the opportunity, certainly, and we think that the stakeholders — the county, the city and the state — have a well-thought-out plan to provide support to this development process," Muller said.

Read more here: http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2014/09...acts.html?sp=/99/101/&rh=1#storylink=cpy
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 5:25 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
(Just in case any eyes from these development groups see this thread)



and by DMTower:




Last edited by Old&New; Sep 27, 2014 at 5:46 PM.
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 6:01 PM
jubguy3's Avatar
jubguy3 jubguy3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 984
Wow, that looks like an awesome plan!
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 9:34 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,640
Why does SLC have such an aversion to splitting up its blocks? As much as I like, say, the Gallivan Center, imagine if, back in the 80s, when the city was looking to redevelop that block, they split it up with Gallivan Avenue going right down the middle, with a continuation of those shops, but also connecting through to Main. Then you could still develop the two major towers, maybe stack the Marriott so it's double its size (more narrow) and have some decent retail options, as well as a potential mid-block tower, and you can even keep the Gallivan Center on the northern end of the block.
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2014, 9:42 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
I don't necessarily think it's Salt Lake City that has the aversion to splitting up the blocks, they in fact are encouraging it. Salt Lake City can't simply take property away from owners. As we know, SLC does have an aversion to using eminent domain. So that bring the burden of splitting up the blocks to the property owners and developers. Property owners don't want to just give up developable property without some sort of compensation.

Yes the city built Gallivan, and my assumption is that they bought as much property as they could afford or that property owners were willing to sell.

I know the city is encouraging the splitting up of blocks, although I'm not aware of what incentives they have for property owners and developers to do so. I would think that a density bonus related to a reduction in parking requirements would be a great incentive.
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2014, 1:23 AM
jtrent77 jtrent77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob rulz View Post
I saw one for Bing recently as well.

Looks like everybody needs their own street view nowadays.
Considering that Bing and Nokia are now both owned by the same company (Microsoft) it was probably a joint effort.
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2014, 3:03 AM
jubguy3's Avatar
jubguy3 jubguy3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 984
Hey, an area of concern for the design is that the Plaza tunnel is way too short to successfully pass under the CCH at an acceptable steepness.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:10 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.