Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironweed
I went to Wikipedia to compare the skyscrapers of Denver vs. those of Salt Lake.
There really is no comparison. Denver lists 32 buildings higher than 350 feet. Salt Lake has... (drumroll....) Six!!  This apparently includes the upcoming 111 S Main. Sorry guys, but that is skid-midget...
As a Utah native, it is exciting to see transit oriented development taking place. Our population is expected to double in the next few decades which hopefully result in higher density development in our urban cores.
SLC as nice as it is, has a bunch of catching up to do from the skyscraper perspective.
|
Compare to other cities with similar MSA:
Hartford: 5 over 350 (3 over 500, though)
Birmingham: 4 over 350
Buffalo: 3 over 350 (1 over 500)
Raleigh: 3 over 350 (1 over 500, only 3 total over 275)
New Orleans: 16 over 350
Richmond: 3 over 350
Louisville: 7 over 350 (2 over 500)
OKC: 6 over 350 (2 over 500 including 844)
Rochester: 4 over 350
Grand Rapids: 1 over 350
Tucson: 0 over 350
Those are the 6 cities just above SLC and the 5 cities just below SLC in MSA population
It's different for CSA:
Kansas City: 13 over 350
Sacramento: 8 over 350
Charlotte: 15 over 350
Pittsburgh: 18 over 350
St. Louis: 9 over 350
Orlando: 7 over 350
Columbus: 13 over 350
Indianapolis: 9 over 350
Las Vegas: >40 over 350
Cincinnati: 13 over 350
Milwaukee: 8 over 350
Raleigh: 3 over 350
So, we are on par or better for cities with similar MSA, but way off for cities with similar CSA