HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10061  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 1:36 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
I think it's just that the whole concept is new to us.

Newfoundlanders who haven't lived away are extremely unlikely to have any experience with what condos are and how they work, and as J_Murphy noted, we're generally very down-to-earth, this isn't a place where people will spent money on something that's not even built.

On the other hand, Newfoundlanders who have lived away are likely to have a more big-city understanding of what condos are, look at proposals here, and think, "Well WTF am I paying condo fees for? Where's the gym? The pool? The cinema? The maid service? This is just an apartment building, what a rip off! Might as well just get a rowhouse."
I have often tried to make a single point, rather unsuccessfully, that the point of building condos is not that of the condo itself necessarily, but the greater point is that condos are of little benefit to most people unless they are helping to create a higher density neighbourhood. Living in a condo in the suburbs almost defeats its purpose. Anytime you build anything, the important question is - "is this making the neighbourhood better?".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10062  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 2:44 AM
jeddy1989's Avatar
jeddy1989 jeddy1989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 2,711
I wonder what they will do with the actual old building? hmmmm maybe offices? IDK it' still a huge building. I doubt they will destroy it, maybe tear down part of it IDK...

Also, everyone will just still call it the Waterford if it's on the same location lol even with a new name to try to shed the stigma... oh well

Waterford Hospital replacement to be built at same location

Quote:
The provincial government announced Wednesday that a new mental health facility to replace the Waterford hospital will be built on the same site.

The new hospital will be constructed on the east side of the current building. The government says several administrative buildings and houses just east of the existing hospital will be demolished.

It also says patient care services at the hospital will not be affected as the new hospital is being built.

A tender has been issued to prepare the site next year.

The construction of the new hospital is scheduled to begin in 2016.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundla...t-to-be-built-at-same-location-1.2709560


https://goo.gl/maps/wZRq1
__________________
-Where Once They Stood-
-We Stand-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10063  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 3:13 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeddy1989 View Post
Waterford Hospital replacement to be built at same location
Well it's good that they are actually replacing it, and not just throwing all the patients out on the street. It's a heritage building though isn't it? It would be nice to keep and refurbish the oldest parts though, the ones with the ghosts in them. Vancouver General is an example of other hospitals restoring some of their oldest buildings now instead of tearing them down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10064  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 12:16 PM
Marty_Mcfly's Avatar
Marty_Mcfly Marty_Mcfly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 7,642
I'd like the old hospital to be refurbished and used for something else, some of the buildings at the Waterford are beautiful. I understand that there are a lot of asbestos issues there that'll need to be taken care of, but I think the benefit may definitely outweigh the cost on this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10065  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 1:13 PM
jeddy1989's Avatar
jeddy1989 jeddy1989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 2,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty_Mcfly View Post
I'd like the old hospital to be refurbished and used for something else, some of the buildings at the Waterford are beautiful. I understand that there are a lot of asbestos issues there that'll need to be taken care of, but I think the benefit may definitely outweigh the cost on this one.
maybe they'll tear down some and refurbish other parts and turn it into a corporate campus like lillydale.
__________________
-Where Once They Stood-
-We Stand-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10066  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2014, 6:42 PM
Horsell's Avatar
Horsell Horsell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 645
Time for a Friday afternoon rant…my topic today is the latest development in Quidi Vidi Village.

I see from the Telegram article that some residents are once again upset with a proposal for 5 units (two duplexes and a single home) for Quidi Vidi Road, and for once, I can’t blame them. It is a quick infill with zero imagination. (The background information is on the City’s site http://www.stjohns.ca/sites/default/file...-48B%20Quidi%20Vidi%20Village%20Road.pdf )

I don’t object to the fact that the developer wants to develop an otherwise empty property (check out Google street view, anything would be an improvement) I think more infill would be appropriate, what I object to is the totally bland nature of the homes.
These are more suited to, dare I say, Kenmount Terrace, than they are to QVV. They will stick out like sore thumbs, or more likely, like sore middle fingers. They no more suit the village than the Taj Mahal does.

This is another reason we need some kind of “design review” committee or standards.
Allowing these five units to proceed at this location is the thin edge of the wedge. Think about the hoops the owners of Mallard Cottage, a few hundred feet down the road, had to go through compared to this proposed development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10067  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2014, 4:48 PM
Da Jama Lama Da Jama Lama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NL
Posts: 17
20 Storey Hotel for Mount Pearl

Rumors of a 20 Storey Hotel for Mount Pearl. Adjacent to the Track and Field complex / Glacier Facility. You'll be able to see it in Gander.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10068  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2014, 5:10 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,308
I hope it happens!
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10069  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2014, 5:19 PM
jeddy1989's Avatar
jeddy1989 jeddy1989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 2,711
that would be fantastic, good spot too, it will become the centre of the region when Galway is underway and there are many amenities in the area along with the highway which goes directly into DT. I say GO FOR IT!
__________________
-Where Once They Stood-
-We Stand-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10070  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2014, 5:31 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,072
Mt. Pearl would then likely have the tallest building. That would be quite a surprise but it could happen eventually; it would even be quite logical, since it's happening in suburban Canada as suburban cities often have less restrictive policies and no heritage regulations to deal with. Mt. Pearl has nowhere to go but up anyway. I reposted this in the rumours thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10071  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 11:57 AM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
I wonder what this will entail...

Quote:
The President and CEO of Nalcor will speak with the media this morning about a judgement from the Quebec Superior Court on a motion the Churchill Falls Corporation, operators of the Upper Churchill Contract, filed in February of 2010.



The motion concerns the disparities of the 1969 Power Contract between CF(L)Co and Hydro-Quebec. Ed Martin will hold a news conference at 10:00 am at Hydro Place. VOCM News will be there to bring you the news first.


Nevermind...we lost....again. To add insult to injury, we also have to pay $1.3M in court costs.

Last edited by J_Murphy; Jul 25, 2014 at 1:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10072  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 2:26 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,308
It's a Quebec court. I don't believe Quebec officially accepts the court decision in 1927 that awarded that portion of Labrador to us. Maps produced in Quebec do not identify Labrador as being separate from Quebec, at least.

So, for them, it's theirs.

And, in this federation, they win.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10073  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 3:32 PM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da Jama Lama View Post
Rumors of a 20 Storey Hotel for Mount Pearl. Adjacent to the Track and Field complex / Glacier Facility. You'll be able to see it in Gander.
This has been in the works for years now. I was working with an engineering company a few years back that was doing some geotechnical work. I believe it was Holiday Inn and it would be on the site of the current baseball field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10074  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 4:00 PM
rthomasd rthomasd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da Jama Lama View Post
Rumors of a 20 Storey Hotel for Mount Pearl. Adjacent to the Track and Field complex / Glacier Facility. You'll be able to see it in Gander.
Are you missing a decimal pt - as in a 2.0 story hotel? Why would Mt. Pearl need that many rooms?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10075  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 4:04 PM
Da Jama Lama Da Jama Lama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NL
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by rthomasd View Post
Are you missing a decimal pt - as in a 2.0 story hotel? Why would Mt. Pearl need that many rooms?
No. decimal is in the correct location.. Now Serving Dannyville and surrounding area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10076  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 4:13 PM
rthomasd rthomasd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 436
Why wouldn't it be in Dannyville?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10077  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 4:52 PM
Da Jama Lama Da Jama Lama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NL
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by rthomasd View Post
Why wouldn't it be in Dannyville?
Tax break in Mount Pearl maybe?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10078  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 7:43 PM
jeddy1989's Avatar
jeddy1989 jeddy1989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 2,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da Jama Lama View Post
Tax break in Mount Pearl maybe?
Mount Pearl was saying that they were looking to open more hotel rooms because they barely have any.
__________________
-Where Once They Stood-
-We Stand-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10079  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 10:25 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,308
Drove past Waterford Valley High. That thing is a beast. Was with a friend from Ottawa. I said, "Around the corner is the new high school they're building."

He looked, gasped, and joked, "Wow, so just a little one then..."
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10080  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2014, 12:08 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
Drove past Waterford Valley High. That thing is a beast. Was with a friend from Ottawa. I said, "Around the corner is the new high school they're building."

He looked, gasped, and joked, "Wow, so just a little one then..."
The student population (900 students) is about 50% larger than Bishops, so I would suppose it's the largest school in St. John's.

It's nice to have a new school of course, but too bad the design is so hideous and stuck in the fifties/sixties, in a bad way.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.