HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10041  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 4:12 PM
Horsell's Avatar
Horsell Horsell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 645
Some interesting(?) discussion going on over at the CBC website with respect to the municipal plan.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundla...oods-may-go-back-to-the-future-1.2696497
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10042  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 4:50 PM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horsell View Post
Some interesting(?) discussion going on over at the CBC website with respect to the municipal plan.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundla...oods-may-go-back-to-the-future-1.2696497
I get too angry reading CBC commentary boards. So much negativity.

It drives me crazy that all you have to do is mention "City of St. John's" in a story and automatically people start spewing crap about snowclearing, sidewalks, potholes, roads, etc. etc. Combine this with absolutely no constructive commentary on how to improve things or little to no knowledge on what it takes to keep a city running.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10043  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 5:03 PM
delesseps delesseps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horsell View Post
Some interesting(?) discussion going on over at the CBC website with respect to the municipal plan.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundla...oods-may-go-back-to-the-future-1.2696497
Commenters on Canadian news sites have never been accused of being fair-minded or thoughtful. I enjoyed living in row houses near a Sobeys, and never cease to be amazed by suburbanites who consider 45 minutes to be an unreasonable commute. Converting existing road space to bus lanes would even out some of those commuting times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10044  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 7:14 PM
Horsell's Avatar
Horsell Horsell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 645
You’re right about the negativism in CBC comments, but sometimes it does have its entertainment value. What is also scary sometimes is how uninformed some people are.

With respect to the discussion of neighborhoods it is good that the consultants have identified a number of areas to work with. In my opinion the city should look immediately to Kenmount Terrance and see if they can correct their mistakes up there to introduce a “town square” concept before it gets totally developed. While they are at maybe they could throw in a few trees. There was also a proposal on the table for multi-story (you know, 4 story “highrises”) condos or apartments up there but I don’t know what became of that. There needs to be some diversity there, and soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10045  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 12:50 AM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
I don't usually like Telegram editorials, but I love this one:

Quote:
I expect to feel the bite of rebuttal to this column, as I’m not really a numbers man. Nonetheless, like many people in this province — dare I say most — I am fed to the teeth with Muskrat Falls and the relentless ranting and roaring that surrounds it.

The daily online forum I host (Naked Lunch, weekdays at 12:30) is often populated by Muskrat Falls critics talking about how the province is headed towards unending poverty and sorrow. Our politicians are destined for something worse, perhaps Dante’s eighth circle of hell, where they will be forever immersed in a lake of boiling tar, a metaphor for their sticky fingers and inky black hearts.

Unable to afford our costly electricity, citizens will torch their furniture to keep warm. And in the end, the Churchill River will burst through the porous North Spur muck and leave the great dam of damnation sitting in the middle of nowhere, forlorn and without purpose.

Before the alligators lurch, let me first say I am indeed skeptical about Muskrat Falls — or at least more doubtful that a cheaper alternative couldn’t have been found. In fact, the whole idea of a Maritime route for electricity seemed truly preposterous to me at first. Surely it was a ploy, I thought — an idle threat to weasel a better transmission deal out of Quebec.

And while Muskrat Falls may have been a lower cost option — or at least a comparable option — when it was announced four years ago, changing energy markets and cost overruns leave little doubt such advantages have been erased.

But I will say this.

We are not the only province that’s going to get hit hard with electrical prices.

In December 2013, the Ontario government released an energy plan that projected a 42-per-cent hike in residential power bills by 2018, rising to 68 per cent by 2032.

In B.C., the government predicted last November that annual rate hikes there will add up to about 45 per cent over the next decade. According to the Vancouver Sun, critics in that province say greater increases are likely if projects such as the proposed $7.9-billion Site C dam come on stream in 2024.

These rate hikes are comparable to those projected by Nalcor last month.

Unfortunately, Nalcor’s name is North Spur mud in the minds of its critics.

In lieu of accepting their projections, some have taken to painstaking calculations that forecast rates spiking as high as 85 per cent. That figure comes from an anonymous engineer named JM, published online by blogger Ed Hollett. Among other contingencies, JM projects Nalcor will lose a water rights challenge by Quebec. (A link to JM’s argument is available at http://bondpapers.blogspot.ca/)

All these numbers are maddening, both in terms of scale and in terms of variability between Nalcor and critics.

But there are a couple of other things to keep in mind.

‰ This project will, as many critics point out, essentially double our public debt. But it’s a different kind of debt, managed not by sapping conventional government revenue but by electricity rate hikes that would have increased to some degree in any case.

‰ The revenue from export sales of Muskrat power will be minimal due to market conditions, but export sales were not included in the original calculations of Muskrat’s viability. They were considered gravy — even if that gravy will be a lot thinner than projected.

In short, it’s fair to say we’d have been better off if Muskrat Falls had not gone ahead. Margins change, and in this case, they clearly haven’t changed for the better.

But please, spare me the agony and despair. I’m sure we’ll pull through — somehow.
http://www.thetelegram.com/Opinion/Colum...-ninth-circle-of-hell%3F-Muskrat-Falls/1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10046  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 11:08 AM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
New tenants on tap for award-winning Duckworth Street building

I love this building, really hoping to see it put to good use soon:

Quote:
The building at 221 Duckworth St. in St. John’s has lived many different lives. It will soon start on its next, according to Noel O’Dea for PropertyWorks.
Responding to inquiries from The Telegram, he said the building’s second floor has been leased to a digital and social media firm, and negotiations are in progress with a potential tenant for the main floor.

Whoever moves in will establish themselves in a prime location in downtown St. John’s.

The South Beach Building, as it is officially titled, stands on its own, with its Miami-inspired colours and art deco structural features.

Built in the 1940s, the building was in hard shape before its painstaking revival, completed in 2009. It included: adding new, custom-made windows to echo the period style; restoration and repair of the exterior concrete work; reinforcement of the roof, and levelling and reinforcement of the floors. An addition was made, providing independent access to the second floor.

“It was really a labour of love and (done) out of respect for the building,” O’Dea said.

He was recognized for the effort with a Southcott Award from the Newfoundland Historic Trust.

Architect Beaton Sheppard worked on the project. “The look comes from the way the building was originally,” he said, explaining everything down to the outside white, blue and pink colour scheme was carefully considered.

“Certainly we’ve always attempted to preserve the character of the buildings downtown ... and yet adapt it to new uses,” he said of his work.

Adaptability is part if the why 221 Duckworth St. remains at the centre of so many memories of life and work in the downtown. Within the past 40 years, it has been home to a radio station, bookstore and art gallery.

Lisa Gushue first walked through the doors in 1978, to go to work at Q Radio.

“I don’t know if my parents slept 30 seconds,” she said, explaining newcomers to the station at that time could end up covering late shifts on their own.

Being a female disc jockey, she was breaking glass ceilings just by heading to work each day.

She vividly remembers the excitement of being in the downtown building’s upstairs control room, or later watching Ron Pumphrey tackle his late-night show.

“It was a good time to get into radio,” said Brian Madore of his start at the station in 1980. Like Gushue, he worked under Colin and Bas Jamieson. His time in the building ran through the fall of 1983.

“Everything was 24-7 live back then,” he said of the radio operation.

As a result, a decent bathroom break sometimes meant playing a long song and hoping to not have to run over the stairs to make it in time to read the news.

For about a year and a half, Madore said, he and some of the other staff were without keys, forcing them to bang on the front door late at night, or run around to the back of the building and throw small rocks against a heavy window to draw attention.

“You had to depend on the person in the building letting you in the building,” he said.

Living in Edinburgh, Scotland, today, Heidi O’Guntke worked at the site from 1987 to 1989, under the on-air alias Kristine Daniels. “They didn’t like complicated names back then in radio,” she said in an email Wednesday.

She remembers 45s (records) that skipped, the sight of 8-track carts and the physical cutting of interview reels.

“(I) loved the big sash windows in the newsroom on the ground floor. I remember the day I interviewed Karen Kain as she gracefully swanned up the steps to the interview studio,” she said, referring to the famous Canadian ballet dancer.

The operation was bought by Harry Steele while O’Guntke was there. CKIX was housed on the ground floor, CJYQ in the upstairs.

Chris Batstone first stepped inside the building in 1989. “It was my first job. I was right out of high school. I started working there the day I graduated high school,” he said. “It was pretty exciting for me.”

The place reminded him of “WKRP in Cincinnatti” — coloured in earth tones from wall to carpet and filled with characters.

He recalled the dimness of the track lighting in the old studio.

“The place, it smelled like smoke. And all the rooms were airless — the studios were anyway — but you could still smoke in there,” he said.

Next door there was a club. Below the club, there was a bar. “You used to see all sorts of craziness going on out there,” Batstone said.

When the radio operation was relocated in 1991, Batstone helped with the move. It involved the transfer of shelves full of CDs, stacks of records and cabinets of paper — news releases and profiles.

James Baird purchased the building and moved in after the radio operation moved out.

“I gutted the place and did the bookstore and the art gallery there for years,” he said, recalling the times of the former James Baird Gallery and WordPlay.

Many people incorrectly believe he is still involved with the property.

“I get more calls on this building. … I’d say once a month somebody calls me,” he said when reached by phone Tuesday.

He left the location behind, as he tells it, out of spite after The Rooms was built.

But he also acknowledges his book sales had dropped off.

The prized property in downtown St. John’s went to a businessman looking to open a restaurant, called Shiraz.

“It never was,” Baird said, offering a story of a business partnership gone sour in its earliest days.

O’Dea later took on the building.

Most recently, the facade earned a starring role in the CBC-TV series “Republic of Doyle,” representing the exterior of a nightclub.

“(It) had the look and feel we were going for, very Miami Vice,” stated Perry Chafe, a co-creator of the show, when asked why it was used.

And while not to emerge as “Club Wabana” in real life, the recognizable art deco locale lives on.


http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/20...ied-past%2C-a-future-being-determined/1#

Last edited by J_Murphy; Jul 10, 2014 at 11:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10047  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 11:22 AM
Horsell's Avatar
Horsell Horsell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 645
It's good to hear that there is going to be life in this building finally. It really sticks out like a sore thumb, but in a good way, it's unique. I'd love to see the ground floor occupied by a "soda fountain" type of diner, maybe a Johnny Rockets, it would suit the building perfectly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10048  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 11:28 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,310
Awesome news!
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10049  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 12:52 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,310
If they could find enough to make some sort of tourist display behind Mile One, that'd be cute.

http://theindependent.ca/2014/07/10/hunting-ancient-animals-in-downtown-st-johns/
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10050  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 1:25 PM
Arrakis Arrakis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,352
Happy 100th Birthday Bowring Park. You deserve better than this!

https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho...52218415041616_5671607869599868003_n.jpg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10051  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 9:53 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,310
My first photo set with UE's helpful processing training. I didn't use Lightbox, but I used what I learned from playing around with it to fix the colour cast without increasing the saturation. I love it! Much more natural looking.

July 10, 2014 - 35C Humidex

Video Link






















__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10052  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 2:46 AM
Townie709's Avatar
Townie709 Townie709 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,775
Emailed the Star of The Sea people a few weeks ago to find out if/when they plan to begin construction. They just got back to me today (don't know why it took so long) but this was their reply

"We plan to begin construction in the next 1-2 years pending the interest we receive from the market (so far, so good!)"

Sounds good but also leaves the door open for it to be further delayed and/or cancelled
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10053  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 9:17 AM
Arrakis Arrakis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,352
I guess posting my pic had a very positive effect. LOL.
http://www.vocm.com/newsarticle.asp?mn=2&id=47627&latest=1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrakis View Post
Happy 100th Birthday Bowring Park. You deserve better than this!

https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho...52218415041616_5671607869599868003_n.jpg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10054  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 11:10 AM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Townie709 View Post
Emailed the Star of The Sea people a few weeks ago to find out if/when they plan to begin construction. They just got back to me today (don't know why it took so long) but this was their reply

"We plan to begin construction in the next 1-2 years pending the interest we receive from the market (so far, so good!)"

Sounds good but also leaves the door open for it to be further delayed and/or cancelled
I don't like that they say 1-2 years out for construction, but I like they said so far, so good. The odds are definitely against them I say judging by the success rate of proposed condo developments in the past few years. Best of luck to them, I really hope this one gets built!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10055  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 2:14 PM
Townie709's Avatar
Townie709 Townie709 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,775
If developers want large scale condo developments to work downtown, someone has to take the risk and build one regardless of previous sales. People do not want to pay for a condo that isn't guaranteed to be built for another 4 years (or even at all). I know if it was me looking for a condo, I would not pay one cent looking at a dirt pile in a ground and being told "we might begin construction in a few years". there is almost no condo market downtown to judge and in order to create one, someone is going to have to take a big risk and adopt the "build it end they will come" philosophy. I feel if someone actually did this they would have huge success and the condo market downtown would take off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10056  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 2:22 PM
J_Murphy's Avatar
J_Murphy J_Murphy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Townie709 View Post
If developers want large scale condo developments to work downtown, someone has to take the risk and build one regardless of previous sales. People do not want to pay for a condo that isn't guaranteed to be built for another 4 years (or even at all). I know if it was me looking for a condo, I would not pay one cent looking at a dirt pile in a ground and being told "we might begin construction in a few years". there is almost no condo market downtown to judge and in order to create one, someone is going to have to take a big risk and adopt the "build it end they will come" philosophy. I feel if someone actually did this they would have huge success and the condo market downtown would take off.
Great post, I totally agree that it must be hard to sell something that may or may not be built a few years down the road. However, I'm not sure if the problem may lie with whoever is funding the project. I'm not familiar with how these developments work behind the scenes, but I thought there was some discussion a few years ago that it was getting tougher for banks to fund hotel and condo developments. Maybe it is a requirement of the lender that a certain percentage of units must be sold before they will release the funds for construction?

Also, I wonder how it works with the building plans and permits? Would they already have detailed design plans in place that would be required to obtain permits, or would this come after they know it will be built?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10057  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 6:19 PM
Horsell's Avatar
Horsell Horsell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 645
Maybe we are all being led to believe that the economy in St. John’s is rosier than it actually is. All indications are that the market for condos, especially downtown, is very weak. The only ones that seem to be selling, and not exactly like hotcakes either, are the three/four story buildings aimed primarily at the 50+ demographic. This group may be less inclined to live downtown, opting instead for quieter areas of the city with a different mix of amenities.

I think that many of the proposed downtown condos are more speculative and the only people interested in laying down a deposit and waiting for two or three years are investors looking to flip something even before it is built or looking at renting them when they are finally built. The number of people willing to wait a couple of years to get something to live in themselves appears to be quite small.

Investors who might be willing to “build it” in the hopes that “they will come” may be looking at the Fort William Condos (salt pile) and see that half or more have been empty for a year or more. (Okay, so the location and price may be a factor there but never the less they aren’t selling.

As was stated above, I think the banks do want to have some assurances as to the viability of a development before getting onside, which leaves only those developers with very deep pockets who are less reliant on the banks who can fund speculative ventures. I don’t see a lot of those developers locally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10058  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 7:21 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,310
I think it's just that the whole concept is new to us.

Newfoundlanders who haven't lived away are extremely unlikely to have any experience with what condos are and how they work, and as J_Murphy noted, we're generally very down-to-earth, this isn't a place where people will spent money on something that's not even built.

On the other hand, Newfoundlanders who have lived away are likely to have a more big-city understanding of what condos are, look at proposals here, and think, "Well WTF am I paying condo fees for? Where's the gym? The pool? The cinema? The maid service? This is just an apartment building, what a rip off! Might as well just get a rowhouse."
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10059  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 5:31 PM
goodgrowth goodgrowth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,226
Not sure if somebody else has mentioned this already but I was just looking at the Canada metro populations on stats can website and and it seems that there must have been adjustments according to the 2011 census or something because the St. John's CMA was at 208,000+ July 1, 2013...I remember it showing around 200,000 for 2012 but according the revised numbers that was hit sometime between 2010 and 2011. Unless the growth rate has changed considerably in the last year... do a basic projection for July 1st, 2014 we are probably at 211,000 give or take.

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo05a-eng.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10060  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 6:13 PM
Marty_Mcfly's Avatar
Marty_Mcfly Marty_Mcfly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 7,642
^We're inching closer and closer to Sherbrooke
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:34 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.