HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2961  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:45 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
New project for 109st/77 Avenue







     
     
  #2962  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:46 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Fox last week

     
     
  #2963  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:55 PM
Mycroft's Avatar
Mycroft Mycroft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 286
Re: New project for 109st/77 Avenue

"Masonry Cladding" = tacky, poorly placed cultured stone.

Otherwise I like the massing and use of townhomes for this site. I can't understand selection of materials by developers in this town though
     
     
  #2964  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:08 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Also, didnt get a shot of it, but the office on 76ave/109st is looking quite good.
     
     
  #2965  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:12 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
     
     
  #2966  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:14 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
     
     
  #2967  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:41 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
New project for 109st/77 Avenue







I think the height has dropped by a floor or two from the first concept that went to EDC. I heard that this DC2 has been a long process....
     
     
  #2968  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:41 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Hendrix

Off to EDC on the 3rd, with luck we should see some site action later summer/fall.
     
     
  #2969  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Corner 1 from EDC minutes

C.1. Corners Tower (Development Permit #147598066-001)
Hartwig Architecture – Terry Hartwig
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: M. Nebozuk
Motion of support with conditions. Administrative walk-on required.
• Provide a drawing that illustrates the possible relationship of the plaza within the Five Corners Development context such that this project takes a leadership role in this development.
• Provide a comprehensive sign package that includes, but is not limited to:
o Restrict the percentage of glazing that can be covered by temporary window signage.
o The signage should also be of a high quality that does not include box signs.
o Digital and neon signs should not be provided.
• Clear glazing shall be provided at the main floor.
• Provide a comprehensive lighting plan.
• Redesign the plaza area to provide a year round pedestrian friendly environment that does not create obstacles between the street and the plaza space.
• Provide plan details of the temporary wall between phases one and two of Tower One.


www.edmonton.ca
     
     
  #2970  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:42 PM
Prairie boy Prairie boy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Spruce Grove, AB
Posts: 94
Jasper is coming along nicely!
     
     
  #2971  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:43 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Studio on the Hill

C.2. Studio on the Hill
Chandler Associates Architecture - John Saliken
9907 - 91 Avenue NW
Site legally described as:
Lots 18 and 19, Block 124, Plan I24A
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of support with conditions.
The Committee supports the level of density that this project proposes along 99th Street.
• Provide adequate screening and cover the parking ramp such that it does not negatively impact the adjacent development.
• Ensure that the parkade air intake is appropriately detailed and is in keeping with the building architecture and landscape design.
• Ensure that there is adequate depth and volume of planting soil and confirm the plant material selection meets Zone 3A requirements.
SECONDED: M. Nebozuk

edmonton.ca
     
     
  #2972  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Litmus test passed!

C.3. Heritage Manor (Development Permit #140148562-001)
GMH Architects - Ed Gooch
10265 - 95 Street NW
Site legally described as:
Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, Plan RN23
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of non-support.
Although the Committee appreciates the desire to redevelop in this area, we find the haphazard resolution of the architecture to be unsupportable. If the proponent truly wishes to create a historic style development, the Committee requests that the proponent selects a single historic style that is appropriate to the neighbourhood and Edmonton. This should be done with the appropriate precedent research.
Edmonton Design Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2014
4
• Provide a more appropriately scaled and signed front entry that does not create conflicts with the parking access and garbage truck movements.
• Reconsider the unit type and mix to avoid the need to create a potential future lightwell that would result in an unhealthy environment for residents.
• If a rooftop amenity is to be provided, ensure that it is of a high quality design that includes hard and soft landscaping (planters) and has an appropriate guard rail design.
• Replace the artificial brick cladding with a more appropriate and durable material.
SECONDED: R. Lederer.

Edmonton.ca
     
     
  #2973  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:47 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Safeway redevelopment

C.4. Whyte Avenue Food Store
Dialog - Darrell Halliwell
10930 - 82 Avenue NW
Site legally described as:
Lot 36, Block 143, Plan 0526142
M. Nebozuk was present during the presentation, but left the meeting during motions due to a conflict.
P. Odinga summarized comments submitted to the Committee by a member of the public (Mr. B. Kropf) and read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of support with conditions. Administrative walk-on required.
• Close the mid-block vehicular access off of 82nd Avenue to provide a mid-block pedestrian plaza space.
• Meet the landscape setback requirement along the entire length of the west property line such that this development does not negatively impact the adjacent properties.
• Redesign the blank wall that encloses the loading area such that it provides a level of visual interest for the adjacent residents and pedestrians moving along 82nd Avenue.
• Provide canopies and weather protection at grade along 82nd Avenue and 109th Street to create a pedestrian friendly environment on the shopping streets as per the Pedestrian Shopping Street Overlay.
• Provide roof line variation along 82nd Avenue and 109 Street. Currently, only the corner rotunda element provides any interest for variation.
• Provide a detailed lighting plan that includes pedestrian oriented lighting on the shopping streets as well as within the parking lot with consideration of Darksky.
• Provide a detailed signage package that includes strict limitations on temporary window signage. This includes “lifestyle” imagery on the main and second floor.
• Provide rooftop mechanical screening.
SECONDED: R. Lederer
Edmonton Design Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2014
5
FOR THE MOTION: R. Lederer, T. Muller, P. Osborne
LOST
OPPOSED: C. Domanski, C. Craig, C. McRae, K. Pacheco
MOVED: C. McRae
Motion of non-support.
The Committee finds that the present design does not achieve the key objective of a pedestrian-oriented character of this commercial area.
• CRU #4 requires a different character than the main building such that it creates interest along 83rd Avenue and 109th Street.
• Utilize articulation or other elements to further break down the monolithic façade of the main building.
• Meet the landscape requirement for the setback along the entire length of the west property line such that this development does not negatively impact the adjacent properties.
• Redesign the blank wall that encloses the loading area such that it provides a level of visual interest for the adjacent residents and pedestrians moving along 82nd Avenue.
• The lack of canopies and weather protection at-grade along 82nd Avenue and 109th Street does not create a pedestrian friendly environment on the shopping streets as per the Pedestrian Shopping Street Overlay.
• The lack of roof line variation along 82nd Avenue and 109 Street does not provide adequate articulation or visual interest for this scale of development.
• The proposed lighting plan does not include pedestrian oriented lighting on the shopping streets as well as within the parking lot. Consideration of Darksky principle should be followed.
• “Lifestyle” imagery and temporary window signage that block views into the buildings do not promote a pedestrian shopping street. The development’s detail signage package must include strict limitations on temporary window signage.
• Rooftop mechanical screening details are required, as this building will be viewed from adjacent multi-family residential projects.
• Vehicular accesses off of 82nd Avenue and 109th Street need to promote a pedestrian first environment. The Committee would support a single access off of 109th Street provided that it is detailed such that the pedestrian movement is uninterrupted. The Committee does not support a mid-block vehicular access off of 82nd Avenue as it interrupts the continuous pedestrian experience along this development.
SECONDED: C. Craig
FOR THE MOTION: C. Domanski, C. Craig, C. Domanski, R. Lederer, C. McRae, T. Muller,
CARRIED
K. Pacheco
OPPOSED: P. Osborne

www.edmonton.ca
     
     
  #2974  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:51 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Home builder?

My wife and I have found a lot we like and Habitat is on our short list as to a prospective builder. We like their designs and they seem to have a good reputation. Has anyone built with them? Thanks.
     
     
  #2975  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:55 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Colleagues have and say good things, but I have not personally dealt with them.
     
     
  #2976  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:58 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Greyhound station move

Downtown Greyhound station eyeing relocation to north Edmonton
Residents in Prince Charles neighbourhood speaking out against proposed site

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/d...g-relocation-to-north-edmonton-1.2658178

Woo hoo!
     
     
  #2977  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:59 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Colleagues have and say good things, but I have not personally dealt with them.
Thanks. Seems to be a common theme.
     
     
  #2978  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:00 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldrsx View Post
litmus test passed!

We find the haphazard resolution of the architecture to be unsupportable
Ouch!

     
     
  #2979  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:02 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Downtown Greyhound station eyeing relocation to north Edmonton
Residents in Prince Charles neighbourhood speaking out against proposed site

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/d...g-relocation-to-north-edmonton-1.2658178

Woo hoo!
Please oh please combine with VIA.
     
     
  #2980  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:26 PM
Simon Speichert Simon Speichert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Corner 1 from EDC minutes

C.1. Corners Tower (Development Permit #147598066-001)
Hartwig Architecture – Terry Hartwig
Is this what is currently a giant pit?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:59 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.