HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2961  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:45 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
New project for 109st/77 Avenue







__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2962  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:46 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Fox last week

__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2963  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 2:55 PM
Mycroft's Avatar
Mycroft Mycroft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 286
Re: New project for 109st/77 Avenue

"Masonry Cladding" = tacky, poorly placed cultured stone.

Otherwise I like the massing and use of townhomes for this site. I can't understand selection of materials by developers in this town though
     
     
  #2964  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:08 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Also, didnt get a shot of it, but the office on 76ave/109st is looking quite good.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2965  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:12 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2966  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:14 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2967  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:41 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
New project for 109st/77 Avenue







I think the height has dropped by a floor or two from the first concept that went to EDC. I heard that this DC2 has been a long process....
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #2968  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:41 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Hendrix

Off to EDC on the 3rd, with luck we should see some site action later summer/fall.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2969  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Corner 1 from EDC minutes

C.1. Corners Tower (Development Permit #147598066-001)
Hartwig Architecture – Terry Hartwig
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: M. Nebozuk
Motion of support with conditions. Administrative walk-on required.
• Provide a drawing that illustrates the possible relationship of the plaza within the Five Corners Development context such that this project takes a leadership role in this development.
• Provide a comprehensive sign package that includes, but is not limited to:
o Restrict the percentage of glazing that can be covered by temporary window signage.
o The signage should also be of a high quality that does not include box signs.
o Digital and neon signs should not be provided.
• Clear glazing shall be provided at the main floor.
• Provide a comprehensive lighting plan.
• Redesign the plaza area to provide a year round pedestrian friendly environment that does not create obstacles between the street and the plaza space.
• Provide plan details of the temporary wall between phases one and two of Tower One.


www.edmonton.ca
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2970  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:42 PM
Prairie boy Prairie boy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Spruce Grove, AB
Posts: 94
Jasper is coming along nicely!
     
     
  #2971  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:43 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Studio on the Hill

C.2. Studio on the Hill
Chandler Associates Architecture - John Saliken
9907 - 91 Avenue NW
Site legally described as:
Lots 18 and 19, Block 124, Plan I24A
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of support with conditions.
The Committee supports the level of density that this project proposes along 99th Street.
• Provide adequate screening and cover the parking ramp such that it does not negatively impact the adjacent development.
• Ensure that the parkade air intake is appropriately detailed and is in keeping with the building architecture and landscape design.
• Ensure that there is adequate depth and volume of planting soil and confirm the plant material selection meets Zone 3A requirements.
SECONDED: M. Nebozuk

edmonton.ca
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2972  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Litmus test passed!

C.3. Heritage Manor (Development Permit #140148562-001)
GMH Architects - Ed Gooch
10265 - 95 Street NW
Site legally described as:
Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, Plan RN23
P. Odinga read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of non-support.
Although the Committee appreciates the desire to redevelop in this area, we find the haphazard resolution of the architecture to be unsupportable. If the proponent truly wishes to create a historic style development, the Committee requests that the proponent selects a single historic style that is appropriate to the neighbourhood and Edmonton. This should be done with the appropriate precedent research.
Edmonton Design Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2014
4
• Provide a more appropriately scaled and signed front entry that does not create conflicts with the parking access and garbage truck movements.
• Reconsider the unit type and mix to avoid the need to create a potential future lightwell that would result in an unhealthy environment for residents.
• If a rooftop amenity is to be provided, ensure that it is of a high quality design that includes hard and soft landscaping (planters) and has an appropriate guard rail design.
• Replace the artificial brick cladding with a more appropriate and durable material.
SECONDED: R. Lederer.

Edmonton.ca
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2973  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:47 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Safeway redevelopment

C.4. Whyte Avenue Food Store
Dialog - Darrell Halliwell
10930 - 82 Avenue NW
Site legally described as:
Lot 36, Block 143, Plan 0526142
M. Nebozuk was present during the presentation, but left the meeting during motions due to a conflict.
P. Odinga summarized comments submitted to the Committee by a member of the public (Mr. B. Kropf) and read the comments of the Development Planner.
MOVED: P. Osborne
Motion of support with conditions. Administrative walk-on required.
• Close the mid-block vehicular access off of 82nd Avenue to provide a mid-block pedestrian plaza space.
• Meet the landscape setback requirement along the entire length of the west property line such that this development does not negatively impact the adjacent properties.
• Redesign the blank wall that encloses the loading area such that it provides a level of visual interest for the adjacent residents and pedestrians moving along 82nd Avenue.
• Provide canopies and weather protection at grade along 82nd Avenue and 109th Street to create a pedestrian friendly environment on the shopping streets as per the Pedestrian Shopping Street Overlay.
• Provide roof line variation along 82nd Avenue and 109 Street. Currently, only the corner rotunda element provides any interest for variation.
• Provide a detailed lighting plan that includes pedestrian oriented lighting on the shopping streets as well as within the parking lot with consideration of Darksky.
• Provide a detailed signage package that includes strict limitations on temporary window signage. This includes “lifestyle” imagery on the main and second floor.
• Provide rooftop mechanical screening.
SECONDED: R. Lederer
Edmonton Design Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2014
5
FOR THE MOTION: R. Lederer, T. Muller, P. Osborne
LOST
OPPOSED: C. Domanski, C. Craig, C. McRae, K. Pacheco
MOVED: C. McRae
Motion of non-support.
The Committee finds that the present design does not achieve the key objective of a pedestrian-oriented character of this commercial area.
• CRU #4 requires a different character than the main building such that it creates interest along 83rd Avenue and 109th Street.
• Utilize articulation or other elements to further break down the monolithic façade of the main building.
• Meet the landscape requirement for the setback along the entire length of the west property line such that this development does not negatively impact the adjacent properties.
• Redesign the blank wall that encloses the loading area such that it provides a level of visual interest for the adjacent residents and pedestrians moving along 82nd Avenue.
• The lack of canopies and weather protection at-grade along 82nd Avenue and 109th Street does not create a pedestrian friendly environment on the shopping streets as per the Pedestrian Shopping Street Overlay.
• The lack of roof line variation along 82nd Avenue and 109 Street does not provide adequate articulation or visual interest for this scale of development.
• The proposed lighting plan does not include pedestrian oriented lighting on the shopping streets as well as within the parking lot. Consideration of Darksky principle should be followed.
• “Lifestyle” imagery and temporary window signage that block views into the buildings do not promote a pedestrian shopping street. The development’s detail signage package must include strict limitations on temporary window signage.
• Rooftop mechanical screening details are required, as this building will be viewed from adjacent multi-family residential projects.
• Vehicular accesses off of 82nd Avenue and 109th Street need to promote a pedestrian first environment. The Committee would support a single access off of 109th Street provided that it is detailed such that the pedestrian movement is uninterrupted. The Committee does not support a mid-block vehicular access off of 82nd Avenue as it interrupts the continuous pedestrian experience along this development.
SECONDED: C. Craig
FOR THE MOTION: C. Domanski, C. Craig, C. Domanski, R. Lederer, C. McRae, T. Muller,
CARRIED
K. Pacheco
OPPOSED: P. Osborne

www.edmonton.ca
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2974  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:51 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Home builder?

My wife and I have found a lot we like and Habitat is on our short list as to a prospective builder. We like their designs and they seem to have a good reputation. Has anyone built with them? Thanks.
     
     
  #2975  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:55 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Colleagues have and say good things, but I have not personally dealt with them.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2976  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:58 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Greyhound station move

Downtown Greyhound station eyeing relocation to north Edmonton
Residents in Prince Charles neighbourhood speaking out against proposed site

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/d...g-relocation-to-north-edmonton-1.2658178

Woo hoo!
     
     
  #2977  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 3:59 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Colleagues have and say good things, but I have not personally dealt with them.
Thanks. Seems to be a common theme.
     
     
  #2978  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:00 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldrsx View Post
litmus test passed!

We find the haphazard resolution of the architecture to be unsupportable
Ouch!

__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #2979  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:02 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Downtown Greyhound station eyeing relocation to north Edmonton
Residents in Prince Charles neighbourhood speaking out against proposed site

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/d...g-relocation-to-north-edmonton-1.2658178

Woo hoo!
Please oh please combine with VIA.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2980  
Old Posted May 29, 2014, 4:26 PM
Simon Speichert Simon Speichert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Corner 1 from EDC minutes

C.1. Corners Tower (Development Permit #147598066-001)
Hartwig Architecture – Terry Hartwig
Is this what is currently a giant pit?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.