Quote:
Originally Posted by Genauso
Big names in Vancouver today:
Oxford (MNP tower), owned by OMERS, Ontario pension fund
Ivanhoe Cambridge (Oakridge mall), owned by Caisse, Quebec pension fund
BCIMC (Canada Post downtown), BC pension fund
Holborn group (Trump tower, Bay parkade), Malaysian Tiah family
Concord Pacific (Yaletown), Chinese Li family
Also while Canadian banks are busy building Toronto, we have the nice addition of Credit Suisse that is funding the Credit Suisse building.
|
You forgot a few big ones one the commerical side, notably Cadillac Fairview, Bentall, Larco and GWL, as well as some new local entrants such as Westbank over at Telus and Amacon
The big real estate players in Vancouver are the exact same as the big RE players in Calgary, Toronto, Montreal etc... with the exception of a few local players in each market.
And Canadian banks are funding the majority of development in Vancouver too. Swiss RE is building their development as a play for their RE division, so it's not even the same as what is going on in the rest of canada, as Canadian banks no longer develop property but simply loan the money to purebred developers. Canadian banks haven't been significant developers for decades.
Quote:
|
The rest are mostly local developers who build what they can finance on shorter timelines, maybe a nod to Starwood which is a public company running hotels for mutual funds.
|
This is not my area of expertise, but isn't starwood run out of New York? As far as I know they don't have any admin functions out of Vancouver?
Quote:
I'm not asking for anything more to be built, Vancouverites are well served. I'll be impressed if Oakridge gets built. I'm happy to have many neighbourhood nodes and I wouldn't want to live in Singapore which feels like a single idea, nor Las Vegas where it feels like everything goes.
The biggest impediment to better serving Vancouver would be facilitating the entrance or expansion of brands that are put off or delayed by currently expensive rents that are based on high land prices. Luxury brands are not held back because they have bigger profit margins and more importantly are growing fast.
|
Like I said before, we have a lot to learn from Singapore and the like (less so LV), and I think there is a LOT of growing for Vancouver to do. That said the impediment to brands not currently in Vancouver is far more complex than expensive real estate. From a retail stand point Vancouver isn't even that expensive, not to mention retailers will only pay a set percentage of what they can make in sales, so costs are in line with sales in this business much more than in other facets of real estate.
Like I said the reason there are brands that don't exist in Vancouver is complex and quite often very unique, but some of the major ones are strategic growth plans (ie focusing on international growth, shying away from current growth etc...), Simple timing issues, or just waiting for the right opportunity. Global retailers are large operations and as such are able to be patient to wait for the exact unit/location they want. I know for a fact Uniqlo has been sniffing around Vancouver for a while, and they are biding their time to find the right unit for them, Victoria's secret spent years scouting out their flagship location, and we all know how long it is taking Apple to land on their flagship location. This is the same in Vancouver as it is in any market. The search for Toronto's apple store for instance has taken years as well.
Quote:
This discussion went beyond serving Vancouver's retail demand, it was about doing bigger or better than what exists today and thus about bringing sales that today are happening elsewhere into Vancouver. I would say myself and Vin arbitrarily focused on growing demand by attracting sales into Vancouver, and you focused on matching the demand of a growing Vancouver and I agree with both. I'm sorry if you're annoyed by my focus on things like sidewalks, if details are avoided or pieces don't fit then I see that as waste which bothers me more than it should (eg: the bottom contour of MNP tower's glass.)
What's your opinion from the developer's perspective? I mean, is there anything that could be done better or that you see will follow after the current trend of projects.
|
There are always things that could be done better, and I fully agree with you and Vin that we should be pushing to enhance and build this city as best we can. What I disagreed with is that we should not be proud of our current standing or that the issues are as easily fixed as it was being portrayed.
i think we should look to the global cities and try to emulate their successes, while ensuring they are strategies that work for our unique market. I suppose you could sum it up that I want everything that you and Vin want, I'm just much more of a pragmatist about how we are going to get there.