HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9241  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 5:37 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
How great is the need for the third runway? Any layouts showing where it is proposed to go?


Think the main point of the thrid runway is to reduce taxi times for the increasing corporate and cargo traffic on the northside of the airfleid.
     
     
  #9242  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 5:49 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
There is significant development pressure in the area North of Highway 19. YEG needs to confirm the layout of the third runway and Alberta Transportation needs to confirm the highway 19 realignment, potentially around the 3rd runway. This is all very critical to the industrial growth of that area and it's good to see things are coming together.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #9243  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 5:55 PM
YegFan YegFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 838
^ wow....imagine the taxi time to get to and from the terminal building!!! Yikes!!!!
.
     
     
  #9244  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 5:59 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
Lets just place this runway across Whitemud Creek. This isn't 1950.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #9245  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 6:09 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by YegFan View Post
^ wow....imagine the taxi time to get to and from the terminal building!!! Yikes!!!!
.
Actually if you look at the wind directions the taxi times would be reduced. They could alternate between runways. One for take off, one for landing, therefore reducing taxi times.

For example, if the Wind is coming from the NE the 3rd runway could be used from departures, as the taxi time to that runway would be short for departures. Arriving traffic would utilized 12-30 as they would land and be close to the south terminal.
     
     
  #9246  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 6:10 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by YegFan View Post
^ wow....imagine the taxi time to get to and from the terminal building!!! Yikes!!!!
.
In the above configuration with aircraft taking off toward Leduc runway 3 will be used for landings and runway 1 for take-offs. Reverse the wind direction and runway 1 becomes primary landing and runway 3 primary for take offs. Under this configuration taxi times actually decrease for Apron 1 aircraft.

The same will happen (reduce taxi times and distances) at YYC once the new runway is operational.

Last edited by Cage; Nov 14, 2013 at 6:11 PM. Reason: What Dansk said.
     
     
  #9247  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 6:10 PM
jerico jerico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 31
I'm no airport guy by any stretch, so someone feel free to educate me. Why would they want the new runway perpendicular to the existing one, as apposed to running the new one parallel with either of the two existing ones?
     
     
  #9248  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 6:39 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
To reduce crossing interactions. If they went for the original plan, they wouldn't have to buy more land either.
     
     
  #9249  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 6:58 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Lol, I like how they actually bothered to put an airport boundary line around the NavCan building. And yes, taxi times could potentially come down in the majority of cases. They're not bad right now but the lack of parallel taxiways is a thorn in tower's side, for sure.
     
     
  #9250  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 7:00 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Come on. No way is YEG busy enough to demand a third runway.
Build it loooooong after it's required? What do you think this is, YYC?
     
     
  #9251  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 8:17 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
     
     
  #9252  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 8:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,027
Nooooo, not my new race track!
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9253  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 11:03 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
Well, I'll venture a guess as to who will eventually replace Mr. Ruth. It's whoever heads YHZ airport at the time of Ruth's departure...or so that seems to be the trend. Well, hopefully he brings good stuff to the table. I think it was time for change. Reg Milley may have been getting tired after doing battle (successfully) for so many years.
     
     
  #9254  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 11:20 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Milley has done a phenomenal job. I hope the Mayor of Edmonton gives him keys to the City - as he has proven his worthiness.
     
     
  #9255  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2013, 11:37 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
EIA twitter feed says "7.2+M passengers and growing".
     
     
  #9256  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 2:22 AM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyeg66 View Post
Build it loooooong after it's required? What do you think this is, YYC?
You're talking about YYC who helped in increasing and solidifying passenger and cargo flights to the airport AND THEN looked at expanding to a long 2nd runway that IS actually required? Just look at YYC now, what a disaster of an airport. They are so behind the times. But yes, YEG has so many more crosswinds, so much volume of traffic and so many incidents that would cause the closure of traffic based on one runway closed. I'm trying to up cyeg66's sarcasm lol.

I remember flying YEG-IAH when UA flew an early afternoon flight out of YEG. While taxiing to the runway, the captain got on the PA and said "We are number one for departure on runway 12". I almost burst out laughing thinking we would be number one for departure for the next hour. Of course, flying out of IAH i assume the captain has run into saying "we are number 12 for departure". The moral of the story is that no aircraft will be waiting very long to depart YEG even if the 3rd runway isn't built for 100 years.
     
     
  #9257  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 5:10 AM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,551
I see Halifax has AC LHR service, TS LGW service, Cubana Havana, Santa Clara and Holguin service, Condor FRA service and FI KEF service. Now THAT is what i call impressive connections for a City with a population just under 400,000 people. If Tom takes requests, mine would be Condor service to FRA.
     
     
  #9258  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 5:22 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by LO 044 View Post
I see Halifax has AC LHR service, TS LGW service, Cubana Havana, Santa Clara and Holguin service, Condor FRA service and FI KEF service. Now THAT is what i call impressive connections for a City with a population just under 400,000 people. If Tom takes requests, mine would be Condor service to FRA.
This market is 5 timers as big as that...
     
     
  #9259  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 5:32 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,893
Only difference is that Halifax doesn't have a competing airport 3 hours away
     
     
  #9260  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 5:37 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Only difference is that Halifax doesn't have a competing airport 3 hours away
Does not matter...think it through
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.