Quote:
Originally Posted by SHOFEAR
wow. a list dominated by universities that allow wealthy individual to get a degree prior to getting a patronage position at your family company. I'm sure those produce some of the most well rounded individuals. Is that what you want the U of A should strive to be?
You (and others) have a misunderstanding that I think the arts are useless. They have a role to play, but the U of A is in a position where it has to cut costs. Thankfully, they are being wise about it and cutting certain arts programs that are rather irrelevant. Or are you going to tell me that Ukrainan folklore is ket to producing a "well rounded individual"? I would imagine that if faced with further cuts, they will continue find art programs that can be cut that if there wasn't outrage from overly sensitive students (spare me, they exist in every faculty) neither you nor I would even know they existed in the first place. What would you do? Spread cuts evenly across all departments? Is that better?
|
again, i think the misunderstanding here is not mine...
the top engineering and technology universities in the world (
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/wo...bject-ranking/subject/engineering-and-IT ) are:
california institute of technology
massachusetts institute of technology
princeton
university of california, berkely
stanford
cambridge
oxford
university of california, los angeles
eth zurich
imperial college London
georgia institute of technology
carnegie mellon
university of texas at austin
university of michigan
cornell
university of california, santa barbara
it's no coincidence whatsoever that you see many of the same institutions at the top of both the arts and the engineering rankings... so yes, that's exactly what i would hope the u of a continues to strive to be.