HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8501  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 3:46 AM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,817
I stole Ryan's photo because I wanted to do some tweaking to fix the house. When I was looking at what could fix them I thought that shutters could work, even though they aren't really typical for these houses. I do think the green house to the right that has the roof in between the rock and siding looks pretty good, the best way to transition between the two materials. However, the windows still look odd.



I also looked at removing the rock completely from the burgundy house, which made it look like a pretty typical house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8502  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 4:20 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is online now
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,067
^ You've got the right idea, here's a little more tweaking:



Can you spot the differences?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8503  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 10:17 AM
Townie709's Avatar
Townie709 Townie709 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,775
Just one piece of trim can go a long way in improving the look of these houses
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8504  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 10:27 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,295
Definite improvements, guys. I'm still fine with what's there but what you've both done definitely looks better.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8505  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 10:56 AM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
^ You've got the right idea, here's a little more tweaking:



Can you spot the differences?
After I uploaded this I put the same roof where the siding and rock meet. I had also thought about wider trim.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8506  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 10:57 AM
Copes's Avatar
Copes Copes is offline
Millennial Ascendancy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,086
Was down in Pleasantville today.

The houses that you guys are discussing are actually a condominium corporation. Which is neat. The corporation is responsible for the "grounds", as well as the shared parking lot hidden behind the houses. There is also a lot of landscaping that has yet to be done there as well. Great critiques of the design though, and all very fair. I think the idea was right for the area, and the density is great. Execution can be debated all day.

As for the new construction started right next to Bennett House, I was told that it will be a one-storey, fully accessible, 6-unit complex for people in wheelchairs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8507  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 11:01 AM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,817
There was an open house at one of them last weekend, it may be on again Sunday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8508  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 5:49 PM
mrjanejacobs's Avatar
mrjanejacobs mrjanejacobs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 460
hha fenestration: the arrangement, proportioning, and design of windows and doors in a building.

The density is good. However, at the same time, I ask myself why they couldn't be connected if they are going to be so close anyway...

I hope some trees are planted and I am hoping that there are some alleys designed between certain houses to provide public thoroughfares for pedestrians. I also hope that the front gardens have a more urban feel opposed to little lumps of sod - there is potential for some really charming front courts/seating spaces. We'll see how people choose to appropriate their properties.

haha and Townie - the materiality and finishing of a facade being sloppy is not really a 'nit-picky' criticism. It's a pretty big design error.

Once again, the "it's not every good, but it's good enough for St.John's..." attitude prevails. haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8509  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 6:19 PM
Copes's Avatar
Copes Copes is offline
Millennial Ascendancy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,086
Landscaping is definitely coming:

http://www.clc.ca/sites/default/files/Landscape-Design-Guidelines-Blocks-1-2-4A_0.pdf

As for the lack of connection, I believe that was due to the planning. The site originally (if you look at the overall Pleasantville plan) called for "single family cottages" or something worded like that, versus other areas of Pleasantville which called for "medium density residential" which is what townhouses and duplexes are classified as on the plan. So the developer would have been required to build the agreed upon housing type.

That is my understanding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8510  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 6:27 PM
Copes's Avatar
Copes Copes is offline
Millennial Ascendancy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,086
I like that the city is pushing for these "PUDs" (Planned Unit Developments... multiple units on one parcel of land that are sold as condos, with the land run as a condo corp.).

It seems to be a new thing, but this one in Pleasantville shows that you can have a lot of density while still giving the "single-detached" feel. It's almost like tricking people into density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8511  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 10:44 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,295
May 3, 2013





__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8512  
Old Posted May 3, 2013, 11:01 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is online now
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,067
Another nice sunset.

Fortis will look nice from that angle (hopefully) when the concrete cores are cladded. Not long ago, it would have been typical to leave all that concrete exposed, although with a better texture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8513  
Old Posted May 4, 2013, 1:50 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,295
May 4, 2013

MUN:



Fortis/351:

__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8514  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 12:41 PM
Copes's Avatar
Copes Copes is offline
Millennial Ascendancy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,086
From today's newspaper:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8515  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 5:27 PM
statbass statbass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. John's
Posts: 1,654
^^^^ Awesome! I'm looking forward to this proposal - this can revitalize that section of Duckworth. This project along with Henry-Bell and the Mix makes for exciting times for Duckworth!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8516  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 6:19 PM
mrjanejacobs's Avatar
mrjanejacobs mrjanejacobs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 460
Re this proposal - I'm indifferent. I haven't seen the renderings so I have no reason to be enthusiastic. However, in terms of 'urban rejuvenation' I hesitate - one or two buildings won't constitute urban rejuvenation (and I really don't think these two will do much).

Urban rejuvenation requires a master-plan and it's usually a concerted effort initiated by a local government or community group.

MIX and all that has a lot more potential to be a game-changer for Duckworth, but it's still not rejuvenation. There aren't even plans for commerce in any of the buildings there. So there's no reason to assume pedestrian traffic will substantially increase (apart from the new residents).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8517  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 6:20 PM
mrjanejacobs's Avatar
mrjanejacobs mrjanejacobs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 460
They are really going to need some immediate amenities next to these buildings on Duckworth - particularly a small corner shop. Hopefully one will open up... somewhere. haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8518  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 6:21 PM
Townie709's Avatar
Townie709 Townie709 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjanejacobs View Post
Re this proposal - I'm indifferent. I haven't seen the renderings so I have no reason to be enthusiastic. However, in terms of 'urban rejuvenation' I hesitate - one or two buildings won't constitute urban rejuvenation (and I really don't think these two will do much).

Urban rejuvenation requires a master-plan and it's usually a concerted effort initiated by a local government or community group.

MIX and all that has a lot more potential to be a game-changer for Duckworth, but it's still not rejuvenation. There aren't even plans for commerce in any of the buildings there. So there's no reason to assume pedestrian traffic will substantially increase (apart from the new residents).
Here's the renders for the two buildings..



Personally, if they remain true to the design in the renders and don't cheapen the design, I love it! I find it looks very elegant and european.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8519  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 6:25 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,295
I love it too. Exciting times for Duckworth. And this greatly increases the density in this odd little stretch of Duckworth with one-floor buildings.

I hope Zachary's and the Vietnamese place are next to go. It's embarrassing to have such buildings downtown - as ugly as most things west of Waldegrave.

Gah... I want this one to go ahead so badly.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8520  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 6:25 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,295
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > St. John's
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:12 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.