HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5921  
Old Posted May 23, 2009, 3:53 AM
toontownguy toontownguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5
Rona Building in Blairmore?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gowest View Post
With all the signs going up and no work being done, it is refreshing to see the activity in Blairmore. Walmart and now there is work going on on the new hotel closer to the schools and pool. If the new Walmart is anything like the Walmart Superstore just opened in Surrey B.C. in a Smart Centres developement it will be a get addition to Saskatoon. This one doesn't look like your usual Walmart.

I was checking out Graham Construction Homepage today and checked out their bid opportunites for the Saskatoon area. Rona is looking to build a $15,0000,000 structure. I wonder if this is the second retail outlet for the Smart Centres?

http://www.graham.ca/Projects/bid_list.aspx
     
     
  #5922  
Old Posted May 23, 2009, 5:48 AM
gowest gowest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 368
Rona

Rona has had plans for some time to build across from Walmart in Preston Crossing. I think they are still talking to Lowe regarding Blairmore.
     
     
  #5923  
Old Posted May 24, 2009, 4:27 PM
lbird lbird is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 155
The Downtown Lighthouse is a bad idea at this point in time, there's already a huge glut of condos on the market. A lack of private financing is a good brake on some of these projects, if there's no demand it's a waste of money to just put up the projects and hope they eventually sell.
     
     
  #5924  
Old Posted May 24, 2009, 6:15 PM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590
lbird;

I can see why you would argue against going ahead with the development from the perspective of the developer, but that is their decision and not for us to debate. Are you arguing that it would be bad for the city as a whole? If so, why?

My thinking is that if you have slow and careful development, you end up with the kind of mediocrity we have already. If you have people who take risks, even if they fail in the short term, at least you have the physical structure in place when the market adjusts to its need. If the lighthoue goes ahead and sells slowly, at least it will be there, drawing people to downtown. The developer may lose out in such a scenario, but I don't see how the city would. It is not like demand is so low that the building would sit vacant for ever.

If the lighthouse does not go ahead, I can see a future of what we have had for the last 30 years, crappy two story stucco multi-unit development in the suburbs, persistently draining demand from downtown, so that nothing ever gets built downtown. That is what has happened for the last 30 years (when the last big residential buildings downtown were built). However, I have to admit that my opinion is based on a limited understanding of real estate and would be happy to hear other opinions.
     
     
  #5925  
Old Posted May 24, 2009, 6:17 PM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatch View Post
So to clarify...

... Mayor Atch can't beach himself on the river bank at a certain hour???


A most disturbing and yet amusing image. I will now forever see the mayor as a wlarus.
     
     
  #5926  
Old Posted May 25, 2009, 1:53 PM
GTR200's Avatar
GTR200 GTR200 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by socialisthorde View Post


A most disturbing and yet amusing image. I will now forever see the mayor as a wlarus.
Ohh the humanity!!
     
     
  #5927  
Old Posted May 25, 2009, 3:51 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,567
Re: Lighthouse

I too, am of the opinion that the fact there are a multidude of 3 storey condo's glutting the market in the suburbs having difficulty selling, does not necessarily mean that a 'downtown' development would have the same problem. There still is a major lack of product/inventory in the downtown core for residency.

The 2nd Avenue lofts are a great addition, but due to their design (very true to the loft style in nature with no walls and open concept) may have a more limited market and may take a bit more time to sell. So we shouldn't necessarly view its vacancy rate as an indication of the downtown market

The KG condos are more 'traditional' in condo design, but based on a sneak peek I had of the show suite, it has been built to really high design standards. I think once this unit is fully marketed with open houses of the show suite, it will see its units moving briskly.

The Rumley lofts, again aesthetically well done, have a more narrow market just because of price point.

That leaves us with not much else downtown at the moment. I think there is a real opportunity for Lake Placid and Lighthouse to capitalize on what I truely believe to be some pent up demand for downtown housing. Our economy, which has remained quite strong, will also experience a 'rebound' along with the rest of the Canadian and global economy in the next few years. If the Lighthouse and Lake Placid get their shovels in the ground now, they will be well positioned to cash in on the demand in a year or two (as it will take that long, at least, to complete construction). Also, with the current reduced construction costs, now is the time to build rather then later!

     
     
  #5928  
Old Posted May 25, 2009, 8:06 PM
drm310's Avatar
drm310 drm310 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 650
Evergreen

Village within the city
Evergreen plan touts development as city's 'greenest' neighbourhood

By Laura Keil, The StarPhoenix
May 25, 2009 11:24 AM


A neighbourhood of interconnecting parks bordering pristine marshland and constructed with minimal need for vehicle use: It's the modern suburb that City of Saskatoon Land Branch project manager Derek Thompson envisions for the new subdivision east of Silverspring.

He says the proposed Evergreen neighbourhood is modelled on a "sustainable urban village" -- a self-servicing community providing mixed housing and commercial zones.

"You can come home from the hospital and stay in this neighbourhood your entire life," Thompson says. "The possibility is there."

The neighbourhood, which will come before city council for approval June 1, will house some 12,600 people at full capacity and encompass two "suburban downtowns."

It's Saskatoon's "greenest" neighbourhood, Thompson says, and it will be a model for further developments in the city.

The design promotes a density of 8.7 units per acre, compared to 5.6 in Willowgrove and three units per acre in Briarwood. The highest density housing around the commercial centres will fade into lower-density housing moving outwards.

Condos, narrow-lot single family homes, traditional single family homes, apartments and seniors' residences will provide what Thompson says will be a vibrant, diverse community.

The 655-acre development will be flanked by Agriculture Canada lands in the south with McOrmond Drive the main artery connecting it to University Heights and bisecting the neighbourhood. To connect the two halves, and ensure the neighbourhood is walkable, a "green bridge" is planned. Residents, especially schoolchildren, on both sides of four-lane McOrmond Dr. will be connected via the landscaped bridge.

On collector streets, boulevard space with trees will separate sidewalks from roads.

As the developer, the City of Saskatoon Land Branch plans to build the neighbourhood in seven phases, spanning a dozen years, but it could start selling lots as early as fall 2010.

Evergreen models developments in other cities, such as East Clayton in Surrey, B.C., and Garrison Woods in Calgary, in environmental design.

Ryan Walker, assistant professor with the department of geography and planning at the University of Saskatchewan, says the new community moves in a sustainable direction, but he questions whether the plans go far enough.

"If this development is taken as an improvement to a conventional suburban design, then I would say it's a remarkable improvement. But if you evaluate this according to a standard of a hallmark environmental neighbourhood in Saskatoon, you've got to evaluate it at a higher standard."

Walker says he is concerned with the growth in the north of the city without viable rapid transit. He main criticism is that the plan still seems to prioritize the automobile.

"I would very much like to live in a community with green ambitions, but when I looked at this, I said I'd never live in this community, it's too far out."

Thompson says the neighbourhood is designed to minimize the amount of driving necessary. Residents can reach stores on the trail system that leads to the village centre or district village, and spend time in the village square. The 10 acres of institutional zone will provide a space for an optometrist, pharmacy, offices or bank, for example.

"We can't force people to walk, but we're offering them a place to go to and a pleasing way to get there," Thompson said.

He says the trick in creating a livable high-density neighbourhood is not "threatening" lower-intensity housing by inserting it into an "intense, commercial and multi-family area." This, he says, has helped the success of Willowgrove, which he also designed.

Thompson says the city will be looking later at incentives for Evergreen to become the first Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)-certified neighbourhood in Canada, but sustainable building practices are already being considered. About 60 per cent of the houses will be within 20 degrees of south, enabling builders to take advantage of solar light and heat. Other sustainable building practices could include permeable paving materials to ease pressure on storm water drains, rain barrels and xeriscaping -- making use of native flora in public and private yards.

The interconnected parks will act as a storm water drainage system, funnelling excess rain water toward the marshland in the north.

Walker says the density targets are a good step, as are the green bridge and mixed zoning, but standards such as LEED must be enforced through regulation rather than incentives for builders.

"We've clearly reached a state in our urban evolution where there is certainty around the importance of environmental stewardship for the public interest."

Walker adds it will take a shift at city council and more consultation with all residents of Saskatoon before councillors will feel they have license to make dramatic changes to new neighbourhoods. He would like to see infill developments close to the city centre planned in direct ratio to suburban plans to avoid the costs associated with the city growing outwards.

Saskatoon Transit manager Mitch Riabko says travel times from Evergreen would likely be 35 minutes to the university and 45 minutes to downtown, running on a half-hour and hour schedule. Bus stops are planned to be within 450 metres of all housing, but will be closer to 250 metres around higher-density housing and 150 metres to care homes. No transit hub is yet planned.

The grading, water and sewer work will begin this year. Mayor Don Atchison has said he hopes the roads will be constructed out of recycled materials from demolished buildings, as the city estimates it can save up to 60 per cent of the cost of building from new materials.

To the north, the northeast swale -- the marshy remnants of an old river -- is a protected site that Meewasin Valley Authority hopes to promote with an interpretive centre. Brenda Wallace, planning manager for Meewasin, says the authority worked closely with the city to protect certain areas from disruption.

She says the engineered storm pond near the swale will drain out to the river if it reaches capacity.

The land north and west of the swale is currently home to a large variety of wildlife, including a healthy population of predators, she says, which indicates a healthy ecosystem.

Trails from the neighbourhood will connect residents to the Meewasin trail, Silverspring and neighbourhoods south for the use of pedestrians and cyclists.

Thompson, who keeps the red commuter bike he rides to work on in his office, says the new neighbourhood represents a permanent shift in the way cities are built.

"I don't think we are, as a society, in a position where we can look at designing solely for a pedestrian environment. But what has been lacking in perhaps the last 40 years has been designing for anything but vehicles."

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Source
     
     
  #5929  
Old Posted May 25, 2009, 8:19 PM
circle33's Avatar
circle33 circle33 is offline
Has been
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 4,936
I'm still waiting for the "Urban Village" they've been touting in Willowgrove for how many years now.
__________________
signature
     
     
  #5930  
Old Posted May 25, 2009, 10:02 PM
drm310's Avatar
drm310 drm310 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 650
I drove through there not long ago to check it out. They have lots of "Future Commercial" signs but little else. It doesn't look like commercial developers are exactly clamouring to build there.

I really hate the acorn lights along Willowgrove Boulevard, radiating light like a thousand suns and not dark-sky friendly. I would hate to live in the houses along that road... it would be impossible to sleep with all that light streaming into the windows.

Quote:
Originally Posted by circle33 View Post
I'm still waiting for the "Urban Village" they've been touting in Willowgrove for how many years now.
     
     
  #5931  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 12:38 AM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590
I would really question if Saskatoon is big enough or difficult enough to drive in yet to support the "urban village" concept.

It works in a bigger denser city like Vancouver, because there are enough people living nearby to stimulate a full range of bussinesses in each neighborhood. You can shop for groceries, hardware, clothes etc. within your neighborhood, because there are enough people living nearby to support all of those bussinesses. You choose to do so because it is a real hassle to drive anywhere. However, to a degree, these urban villages have evolved naturally as zoning allowed it (ie. properties shifted from residential to commercial or vice versa), rather than being designed by omniscient planners.

I think that Saskatoon could easily encourage local bussiness and increased density through three easy (and money saving) measures: 1) less money spent on road infrastructure between neighborhoods (to make driving less desireable), 2) not allowing (or at least severly limiting) power centres and 3) having flexible zoning within neighborhoods to allow local bussinesses to evolve and densities to increase wherever they are most needed.
     
     
  #5932  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 4:14 PM
Wyku Wyku is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 534
The plan for Evergreen sounds good on paper, but the reality is that 95% of the people who will be living in that neighbourhood and working will still be working outside of the neighbourhood. It's only going to add to the traffic snarls on Attridge-Preston-College-McCormand-Circle Drive during the morning and evening commutes as yet another neighbourhood is packed into that area.
     
     
  #5933  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 4:52 PM
shmakim shmakim is offline
Burb Dweller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 243
See, in suburban northeast Saskatoon neighbourhoods, we've got housing down pat. Whole suburbs are full of houses, with a little pocket of retail near one end. If Evergreen is going to fly (with Saskatoon's previously described low density), how about we repurpose some of the land in neighbouring areas like Willowgrove, Erindale, and the ultimate in suburban living, Arbor Creek (the neighbourhood with nothing but houses and roads), to allow for the necessary diversity of businesses.

Evergreen is described as having all sorts of work-and-live opportunity because of the shops. I don't know how big a slice of the pie is made up of retail work. We also need industry, and professional offices. I suspect lots of people in those suburbs work in offices, doing sales, service, or other professional work.

I live in the burbs, but I work from home. The only way I could work in an office close to home is if somebody built for instance a Class A copy of Discovery Plaza somewhere near me, maybe in that new 23 acre mall planned for University Heights SC? EVERY commercial development of that scale should include office space. Seems it's a gamble, but if somebody built something nice, and big, we may get decent companies locating their offices there, and anybody joining (or already working at) that company could make the no-brainer choice to live right nearby. But that hasn't happened.
     
     
  #5934  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 7:01 PM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590
[QUOTE=shmakim;4270287].. how about we repurpose some of the land in neighbouring areas like Willowgrove, Erindale, and the ultimate in suburban living, Arbor Creek (the neighbourhood with nothing but houses and roads), to allow for the necessary diversity of businesses...

QUOTE]

Great idea, but I wouldn't want to be the one defending at the "town hall" meeting in Arbor creek. I can see the Gucci loafers and purses flying.
     
     
  #5935  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 8:42 PM
midnightrambler's Avatar
midnightrambler midnightrambler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 264
I had someone call me and ask for a couple of shiny spades for a ground breaking ceremony on Monday. So I am thinking we might finnally see some action with River Landing. However, it could be for the new Wal-Mart as well so who knows....
     
     
  #5936  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 10:51 PM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
So does anyone else agree that with a surplus of bus drivers they should add perhaps two circle routes which could easily provide jobs for those drivers, and perhaps additional routes for newer areas or industrial areas. Just a radical idea I had
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #5937  
Old Posted May 26, 2009, 10:51 PM
EarlyByrdProductions's Avatar
EarlyByrdProductions EarlyByrdProductions is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The S'toon & Marsella, Nicaragua
Posts: 283
bike share transit

check this out,

http://www.leaderpost.com/life/Part%20bicycle%20part%20taxi%20meet%20Bixi/1595609/story.html

i had mentioned in an earlier post for how economically feasible it might be to have some sort of bike share program like i loved so much living in france.
it may be a long ways until saskatoon might be capable of such a feat but at least montreal has broken ground as the first in north america to offer such a great community building initiative.
__________________
www.viyarte.com
     
     
  #5938  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 6:09 AM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
I'm really intrigued by this bike sharing idea and think it would be a very unique way to foster interaction within the public realm as well as promote alternative transportation methods. I can't see Saskatoon getting this anytime soon, I feel we would have an unfortunatley high rate of theft I think first the city needs to sort out its bus situation as well as cycling route situation meaning create better transit routes and add many additional cyclist routes and educate the public on cycling within the city
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #5939  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 6:25 AM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Date: May 22, 2009
Delete Delete
Subject: The Future of U of S Land - Open House
The following announcement is sent on behalf of Richard Florizone, vice-president finance and resources and Karen Chad, acting vice-president research.

---

The University of Saskatchewan is engaged in a process to study the role of its significant land holdings in serving its mandate and to make decisions regarding their future use.

You are invited to an open house to hear Richard Florizone, vice-president finance and resources, speak about the university's Vision 2057: Land Use Planning Process - what it is and next steps.

The purpose of this open house is to gather feedback in order to recommend a land designation system to the university's Board of Governors that identifies the best use of the university's land.

Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Time: 4 to 8 p.m.

(Two identical presentations� 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m.)

Place: Faculty Club, 101 Administration Place, U of S Campus

For more information, contact James Cook at [email protected]

-----
Posted to All Students by RCM-SESD
Some of you may already be aware of the university's ongoing discussions regarding the redevelopment of their agricultural land holdings within Saskatoon, if not, now you know.

What I found most interesting about tonight's presentation was learning why the university intends to develop their agricultural lands, which parcels are suited for redevelopment, and how such decisions will impact the university's operations.

The following map is an accurate (as I recall) account of how the university values its lands. Land is designated as being Core, where the university may expand its academic and research facilities; or Endowment, land intended to be leased (preferred option), or sold for development of non-academic facilities (not directly related to the university). Financial returns from Endowment lands are expected to be used for strategic long term planning initiatives, not operating expenses. There are complexities to what kind of developments are possible on Endowment lands, but I got the impression the university was open to all possibilities. Residential, commercial, research parks, there was even a brief suggestion (from an audience member) that agricultural land uses could be integrated with a mixed-use neighborhood, providing an interesting experiment for showcasing an innovative urban-rural environment.


The U of S owns 18% of land within a 5 km radius of downtown Saskatoon (~ 1,900 acres).

The university and city are currently developing their long term land use plans, and are working closely to identify issues of mutual concern. As the university searches for replacement agricultural land of close proximity to the city, the city is looking for opportunities for infill development. Land swaps between the university and city are very likely.

Somewhat unrelated, but Richard Florizone commented on the current square footage of total academic/research facilities (currently 5 million sq. ft...includes Innovation Place), and the potential for a 60% increase within the existing campus/research park lands (3 million sq. ft...primarily 4 storey structures).

Meridian's Karl Miller was in attendance, and the presentation included newly revised renderings (a marked improvement, although I only caught a brief glimpse) of the soon to be constructed student residences. There was mention of an outdoor pedestrian retail street/corridor beginning from College and running parallel along Cumberland Avenue, this was part of the overall College Quarter land use plan.

They did not provide a specific time frame for development, but 2010 is when the city and university begin to reformulate their land use planning visions, and policies. These reforms will guide all future development within the city, and redevelopment of the agricultural land holdings. However, development of the lands is not expected to be complete for 50-100 years (given current demand for land in Saskatoon).

Last edited by Ruckus; May 27, 2009 at 6:02 PM.
     
     
  #5940  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 5:11 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
An addition to the previous post...

U of S outlines land use future
By Jeanette Stewart, The Star Phoenix May 27, 2009 8:08 AM Be the first to post a comment

A new vision for land use at the University of Saskatchewan was presented at an on-campus open house Tuesday.

After two separate review processes, administrators have determined which land will remain part of the core campus and which can be opened up to alternate development, marking that land as "endowment" property.

The university owns 18 per cent of the land within a five-kilometre radius of the city's core -- land with diverse and potentially lucrative potential. The 1,865 acres host a blend of campus buildings, research facilities, health care and recreation facilities, commercial developments and housing, as well as providing a large amount of green space within the city.

"Looking at it from an economic lens, some people have called it perhaps the most valuable greenfield potential real estate in the country," said Richard Florizone, vice-president of finance and resources.

The land also has both academic and research potential, and represents the campus' ability to expand.

Lands marked "endowment" include packages of land bordered by the river, the CP rail line and Preston Avenue and parcels of research land near College Drive.

Land marked as "core" includes that already holding most of the buildings on campus. This area has the potential to hold an additional five million square feet of space.

According to James Cook, with the university's corporate administration, any development of the land would have to have the potential to generate approximately $1.5 billion before the university would consider conversion for commercial purposes. Any changes of this manner would need re-zoning by the city.

"We literally are talking about changes that could take 50 to 100 years to realize," said Calvin Brook, an urban design consultant with Brook McIlroy Inc. who has worked extensively with the U of S.

Florizone cited the big-box shopping centre at Preston Crossing as an example of a commercial use of university lands otherwise not of immediate use to the campus. Preston Crossing generates $1 million annually in scholarship funds.

The land use at the university first came under review in 1999. A land use task force worked on the project in 2007 and 2008. Additional consultations took place in 2009.

The university hopes to partner with the city when it begins its next long-term plan in 2010. By that time, the university expects to be able to open use of its land for public consultation as part of the city's larger planning process.

"If we're able to come to some consensus ourselves, we can then join this broader public consultation," Florizone said. "What we do with it is also very important to the city."

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Star Phoenix

Source

____________________________

I don't recall hearing the statement in bold, and I am a surprised, but also disappointed if that is indeed the university's position. $1.5 billion? That's a significant increase from the current $1.5 million the university receives annually from the Preston Crossing lands. Perhaps the value is incorrect, probably meant million.

I could have misinterpreted that statement too. How does one generate $1.5 billion from urban land holdings? It is either sold, or leased to another party. No way that land is worth $1.5 billion. The potential for an increase in value over time is certainly there, but $1.5 billion? They must know something I don't...maybe there is oil/gas or potash below that land.

EDIT: I did some rough calculations using Google to determine price per acre for the endowment lands. A total of 874 acres is designated endowment land. So, to generate $1.5 billion from the 874 acres, an average price of $1,716,247 per acre is required (either selling, or some combination of leasing and selling). For comparison, Preston Crossing is roughly 63 acres total, with an average price per acre being $23,810 (generated annually). All things held constant, if the university leased all of their endowment lands at the current Preston Crossing price, they would generate $20,809,940 annually. In such a scenario, it would take 72 years to realize a $1.5 billion return.

Here is another comparison of City of Saskatoon land values. Lake Placid's River Landing site is 2.24 acres, and the city values it at $4.5 million. The price per acre for that site is $2 million. One has to remember that is downtown waterfront land. Imagining a similar waterfront development as it applies to university lands, we have potential between Circle Drive and the CPR tracks (river to the west), and north of Circle/Attridge and west of Central Avenue (river to the northwest). Just a guess, but the remaining landlocked sites will likely be of lower value than the waterfront sites.

Last edited by Ruckus; May 27, 2009 at 6:19 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.