HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2901  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 7:34 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
A couple of comments upon returning from van...

-density
-urban design
-material use
-water as art/sound dampening
-park space
-destination stores/restaurants

all good things, who'd have thought?
aaaaand??? If you're saying 'we' need work in those categories 99.9% here would agree....
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #2902  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 7:48 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
Downtown Van, despite some flaws (people tend to nit-pick them), is pretty much the best large scale case study in reurbanization and urban design in this generation.
     
     
  #2903  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 8:19 PM
tony0911 tony0911 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 484
^100% totally agree.
     
     
  #2904  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 8:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2905  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 11:17 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
dmonton's federal wish list comes to $2.4B


BY GORDON KENT, EDMONTONJOURNAL.COMJANUARY 26, 2009 4:01 PM




Canada's Governor General Michaelle Jean (R) and Prime Minister Stephen Harper laugh before the Speech from the Throne in the Senate chamber on Parliament Hill in Ottawa Jan. 26, 2009.
Photograph by: Chris Wattie/Wattie, NP
EDMONTON - Edmonton has identified $2.4 billion worth of projects that could start immediately if federal funding becomes available in Tuesday's budget.

These include the $825-million extension of the LRT from downtown to NAIT, $462 million for new buses and $50 million to revitalize 118th Avenue.

"I'm very pleased the federal government is going to be investing in cities. The devil is in the details. We will see what the details are," Mayor Stephen Mandel said Monday.

"There will be no end of things we can place the money into. We just have to make sure we use it wisely."

Edmonton's wish list is part of a national campaign by municipalities pushing for greater infrastructure spending.

Monday's throne speech promised new investment in infrastructure, but no details.

Calgary's list includes a number of projects that could be started within 120 days, ranging from affordable housing to new LRT lines to green initiatives.

"There really is a bit of an extensive menu for the kinds of options available to the Government of Canada if they do want to invest in municipal infrastructure," Mayor Dave Bronconnier said. "If the government is looking for shovel-ready projects, we have a number of them."

Bronconnier said whether a stimulus package benefits municipalities depends on how it's structured.

"We're not going to do projects for the sake of doing them. We want smart projects for areas of infrastructure that are needed in Calgary," he said.

Requiring cities and provinces to match the cash would require "a hard look," Bronconnier added.

"Municipalities have already done their job in terms of contributing to infrastructure and keeping the economy going. We've been there on the front lines," the mayor said.

[email protected]

With files from the Calgary Herald

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Edmonton+federal+wish+list+comes/1220019/story.html
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2906  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 12:05 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony0911 View Post
^100% totally agree.
101% totally agree.....
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #2907  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 12:19 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,624
Yeah, the thing is the government has only leaked info of $4 billion in new spending over 2 years. IE drop in the bucket.
     
     
  #2908  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:14 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Here is the Artisan condo that went to EDC on the 20th. This is proposed for 111th ave and 91 st, just to the west of the Esks office by Commonwealth stadium.



__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
     
     
  #2909  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:30 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
Here is the Artisan condo that went to EDC on the 20th. This is proposed for 111th ave and 91 st, just to the west of the Esks office by Commonwealth stadium.



While not horrendous, it can certainly come up a tier.

The renderings aren't good enough for me to pick out the details.
edit
WHOA is that car parking in the "patio"? Nuh-uh no you didn't.
     
     
  #2910  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:31 AM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
hmmmmm.... BKA?
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #2911  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:38 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
Here is the Artisan condo that went to EDC on the 20th. This is proposed for 111th ave and 91 st, just to the west of the Esks office by Commonwealth stadium.



Interesting. Its not BKA, the architect recently departed from the firm. Ziola was the 'Z' in BZKA. Does anyone know how it went? There are some elements to this that I like and some I don't.

C.3. 18:15 Artisan Condominium - Development Permit Application
Ziola Newstudio Architecture - Tyler Dixon
9103 - 111 Avenue NW
Site legally described as:
Lot 3, Block A, Plan 1573ET; Lot 3, Block A, Plan 1573ET;
Lot 4, Block A, Plan 1573ET, Lot 5-6, Block A, Plan 1573ET;
Lot 7-9, Block A, Plan 1573ET
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #2912  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:40 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
While not horrendous, it can certainly come up a tier.

The renderings aren't good enough for me to pick out the details.
edit
WHOA is that car parking in the "patio"? Nuh-uh no you didn't.
I agree. However, the shared parking-public space is something that you see in many places throughout Europe. Essentially parking shares the same space as the common areas (sidewalks and patios).
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #2913  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:43 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
That area along 111th is so run down. I'm glad to see a project for that area that is of higher calibre than what we've typically seen around there.
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
     
     
  #2914  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:46 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
I agree. However, the shared parking-public space is something that you see in many places throughout Europe. Essentially parking shares the same space as the common areas (sidewalks and patios).
I just can't see it the same way. In Europe its forced to be like that due how compact areas are.
If there are in fact provisions for store fronts and espeacially for patios, I am more open to the idea.

Like I said, I can't grab the details from these renderings...too vague. Massing seems, meh? Windows seem small? Its really hard to say from what I am seeing.

Yes development in that area is excellent!
     
     
  #2915  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 4:59 AM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
I agree. However, the shared parking-public space is something that you see in many places throughout Europe. Essentially parking shares the same space as the common areas (sidewalks and patios).
I'm pretty sure it's all parking though according to the rendering. Just with signs blocking the entrance/exit, and small channelized laneways to almost ensure right-in,right-out car movement.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #2916  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 5:38 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
This was discussed a few days ago on this thread. Sounds like something is being done:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2009/01/26/edm-panhandling-police.html
     
     
  #2917  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 2:28 PM
tony0911 tony0911 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 484
I don't know I would put it pretty close to horrendous.
     
     
  #2918  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 2:45 PM
newfangled's Avatar
newfangled newfangled is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
Here is the Artisan condo that went to EDC on the 20th.
The best parts are the roof deck and retail. (and could the courtyard parking be intended for the retail, with resident parking underground?)

Aesthetically though, it will be meh or worse. Architects here need to learn that vast expanses of white stucco with punched windows is just not a good look. Mix in some other materials and break things up a bit.
     
     
  #2919  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:43 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
/\ For the area it's being built it, I could care less. My one concern is the parking right in front and their lame attempt at masking it.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #2920  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:55 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
The more I look at it, the more I wish they would have built the courtyard facing the rear.

Stilll, given the area, I don't mind the BZKA usual design features.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.