HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 7:28 PM
brento79
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That was a good response from them.
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 7:52 PM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
Received this explanation from EAA regarding YEG and FRA:

Greetings you are correct that other cities than Edmonton received Frankfurt services, including Ottawa with a smaller passenger base. Very frustrating, but explained simply. Emirates Air has commenced service from Toronto into Dubai, tapping into a passenger base who previously used Frankfurt as a connection. Air Canada and partner Lufthansa are endeavoring to keep those passengers by giving them the Frankfurt non-stop. Emirates is looking at Western Canada for it's next Canadian destination, so the same strategy was employed the added capacity to Frankfurt out of Calgary.

As far as Zoom it couldn't compete with our strong loads via Air Canada's London-Heathrow service.
Thanks for the explanation EAA. It is appreciated.
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2007, 11:01 PM
big W big W is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: E-Town
Posts: 5,426
I would love it if Edmonton was the next destination for Emirates, but I am sure it will be Vancouver.
__________________
SHOFEAR- "The other goalie should have to turn in his man card. What a sorry display that was." - March 24, 2008
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 12:18 AM
Canadian74 Canadian74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB/BC
Posts: 710
Emirates's next Canadian destination will be Calgary. They mentioned it in a press release.
But they will go daily to YYZ first before entering Western Canada. And the current bi-laterals doesn't allow any more additional flights and no negotiations will take place before late 2008 or early 2009. Don't know what will Calgary's market be by that time (growth has already slowed down). They might consider Montreal or Vancouver first if they have to wait till like 2009 or 2010.
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 12:41 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
^you have to think YVR before YYC...there is a huge amount of investment looking at vancouver, the port there of, and other misc. developments. While YYC does make #3/4 sense, it doesnt make #2 imo.

yes...i do know oil is in calgary
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 3:16 AM
brento79
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I actually think YYC is the best option for them over YVR.
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 6:24 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
/\ because of Oil HQ?
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 6:49 PM
brento79
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes! Plus they have just as good of connections within Canada as YVR.
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2007, 7:27 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by brento79 View Post
Yes! Plus they have just as good of connections within Canada as YVR.
BUT (1) the Olympics are in Vancouver - and there will be legacy growth from that event well into the future (2) Vancouver is positioning itself to be much more competitive with Seattle and Calgary - an awakening giant so to speak (3) YVR will always be way a head of YYC as an international HUB. Calgary is a want to be that will never make it - destined to second tier like YEG (even if they have more flights than YEG they are still second tier). Vancouver has arrived - and the only place for them to go is UP.
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 12:18 AM
Canadian74 Canadian74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB/BC
Posts: 710
Guys, I will say it again... EMIRATES HAS SAID IN A PRESS RELEASE (WORLD TOUR) THAT THEY WANT TO COME TO CALGARY ASAP... BUT THE CANADIAN GOV'T. IS NOT WILLING TO NEGOTIATE A NEW BI-LATERAL WITH THE UAE.

And I know YVR and YUL make more sense before YYC... I am just telling you guys what EK said. Even I was surprised when they said that... Let's wait and see what happens... If you want my personal opinion, I think they will go daily to YYZ, YVR, YUL first before YYC.
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 12:56 AM
KrisYYC's Avatar
KrisYYC KrisYYC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian74 View Post
Guys, I will say it again... EMIRATES HAS SAID IN A PRESS RELEASE (WORLD TOUR) THAT THEY WANT TO COME TO CALGARY ASAP... BUT THE CANADIAN GOV'T. IS NOT WILLING TO NEGOTIATE A NEW BI-LATERAL WITH THE UAE.
I haven't heard anything about the Canadian government's unwillingness to negotiate a new bi-lateral. More likely it's the UAE wanting unlimited rights to the Canadian market without reciprocating. This a common of the UAE and Singapore. There isn't much I like about the Canadian government but when it comes to bi-lateral negotiations they are spot on.
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 3:16 AM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisYYC View Post
I haven't heard anything about the Canadian government's unwillingness to negotiate a new bi-lateral. More likely it's the UAE wanting unlimited rights to the Canadian market without reciprocating. This a common of the UAE and Singapore. There isn't much I like about the Canadian government but when it comes to bi-lateral negotiations they are spot on.
AFAIK, the UAE was actually offering unlimited rights beyond; however, that doesn't offer a lot of benefits for Canadian carriers. Instead, the Canadian government offered the current rights where each carrier is allowed three flights per week and the situation will be renegotiated once the route is proven to have the traffic.
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 3:17 AM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian74 View Post
Guys, I will say it again... EMIRATES HAS SAID IN A PRESS RELEASE (WORLD TOUR) THAT THEY WANT TO COME TO CALGARY ASAP... BUT THE CANADIAN GOV'T. IS NOT WILLING TO NEGOTIATE A NEW BI-LATERAL WITH THE UAE.
Check out the other airlines and their "Canada is too expensive" whines *cough Cathay cough*

What they say to get cheaper "X" vs what they do are 2 different things.
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 6:34 PM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,344
New sun destinations launched for the holidays

Edmonton, Alta. – WestJet today commenced the first of two new sun destination services from Edmonton International Airport – Canada’s fastest-growing major airport – with the departure of the inaugural flight to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. The new Mazatlan, Mexico flight, new for WestJet, departs tomorrow.

“We congratulate WestJet on launching these new services to give sun worshippers in Western and Northern Canada more opportunities to take a break from winter,” says Peter McCart, Vice-President, Marketing, Edmonton Airports.

Starting December 21, 2007

Edmonton – Cabo San Lucas, Mexico (Friday)

Flight Departure Arrival
From Edmonton – WS1184 7:45 a.m. 12:22 p.m.
From Cabo San Lucas – WS1185 1:10 p.m. 6:11 p.m.


Starting December 22, 2007

Edmonton – Mazatlan, Mexico (Saturday)

Flight Departure Arrival
From Edmonton – WS1182 11:05 a.m. 3:39 p.m.
From Mazatlan – WS1183 4:30 p.m. 9:37 p.m.


The new WestJet services are part of a record 26 flights per week to 10 non-stop sun destinations set for Edmonton International during the 2007-2008 winter season.
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2007, 10:55 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
^we have quite the good sun spot list now...well except florida and hawaii
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2007, 2:16 AM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
I'm surprised WJ hasn't started a YEG-HNL flight yet.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2007, 3:02 AM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
too far for ETOPS?
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2007, 3:33 AM
KrisYYC's Avatar
KrisYYC KrisYYC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmonchuck View Post
too far for ETOPS?
You're right. Even YVR-HNL is a stretch for a 737 and Westjet often takes payload restrictions on this flight.
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2007, 3:45 AM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
Yes I recall a situation last year where WestJet had to go YVR - SFO - HNL for a while because of the distance issues and their jets
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2007, 7:18 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,008
On a side note, SBUX opening at YEG in Spring 08 post security. I have been waiting for this....
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.