Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_olsen
Well, if the city isn't going to force the muni to stop operations it should let the airport take advantage of the infrastructure it is building to serve it.
Instantly Edmonton would have an airport served by a world class LRT system, providing seamless transportation to the CBD, University, and stadiums. I am just saying the city shouldn't ignore the possibilities.
Also what is good for tourists and business travelers is good for business. For no dollar cost the city could improve the business climate.
The city shouldn't wait until 2052 to decide what to do with their airport. If the city needs another general aviation field for corporate and medivac flights it should start looking at securing rights to use Namao as a general aviation base. (Many airports are shared with military aviation, Winnipeg, Pittsburgh and Frankfurt for example) Namao is also closer than YEG practically bordering the Henday when it is done.
|
First, as far as i know, Namao is now a heliport and the runway(s) was demolished quite a while back. You might as well throw Villeneuve airport into your arguement. BTW, the military is leaving Frankfurt. That area will be the site of FRA's new terminal expansion.
Second, is it better for tourists and businessman to fly to YEG and take a 30 minute cab-ride to downtown? Or fly to YYC/YVR, endure a 40-90 minute layover, fly to YXD, then take a 10 minute LRT ride to downtown. Businessman to/from Calgary/Vancouver are the ONLY ones that benefit. Do i need to say how many people don't benefit from this setup?
Third, your arguement about 4 Dash-8's is absurd. The 4 Dash-8's would turn into 15 Dash-8's and they would turn into Boeing 737's like in the old days. We would be a complete feeder service to YVR, YYC and maybe even YWG. And again you are comparing Edmonton with Toronto when looking at Porter airlines. How big is Toronto? How big is their metro area? How big of an airport is Pearson? How many connecting flights does it serve as THE Air Canada hub? Like others have mentioned in so many ways, you're comparing apples to oranges and how you fail to see that is beyond me.
Fourth, your question about suing if the Muni closes down. I'm not a lawyer but here's a thought. Close one of the two runways. Then shorten the other runway so nothing larger than a 15 seater turboprop can land, if that. It's still an airport right? That will kill the debate once and for all. That land, though, is prime land and it could probably be sold and 10% of the money would take care of any lawsuit.