HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:24 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
*disclaimer - SSP in no way or form is responsible for the well being, health, aliveness, or state of member "coldrsx". All posts, ideas, fake towers, real towers, beer nights, et al. are not assumed to be anything more than hearsay.

having said that, how about this on the current BP's and north of it site:> Or commonwealth lands.

__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:26 AM
big W big W is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: E-Town
Posts: 5,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^actually in that area of oliver and given the lot size....it is appropriate.
I actually recall that in that part of Oliver you cannot go over 4 or 5 stories
__________________
SHOFEAR- "The other goalie should have to turn in his man card. What a sorry display that was." - March 24, 2008
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:28 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
enter the "DC2":>
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:40 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
and here is an example of what not to build here.....dear lord

__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:42 AM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by big W View Post
I actually recall that in that part of Oliver you cannot go over 4 or 5 stories
yeah, I saw a sign up for that project about 2 weeks ago. I was going to sa something, but it completly slipped my mind. From the design posted on the giant billboard there, it looks like that POS 300k+ concrete condo near whyte that people were b*tching over approx. 1 month ago.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:43 AM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
god don't let Bruno Mastroprimiano see this....Venetian II

__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:45 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,117
so boys....whats next to be announced?
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 12:47 AM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
so boys....whats next to be announced?
Edmonton (snicker) architects (snicker) give up all pretension and announce that all future designs in Edmonton will continue to be modeled on things they find floating (or not) in their toilets after a night of Mexican indulgence.
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 2:05 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,085
Murman, I would have been on your side if the Professional Building renovation didn't include an increase in office space and development of the gravel parking lot. Removal of a gravel parking lot supersedes the need to preserve the facade.
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 2:14 AM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,032
I'll repost the comments I made about this on C2E:
I am completely amused by the prophetic comment from Murman:
Quote:
My concern is that you could get a Devonian-ish facade replacement. Before you all go snakey on me about how much better the Devonian looks now than before, I agree with you on that point as it strictly pertains to the Devonian. However, getting rid of the existing Professional facade would be a real shame, in my eyes. (The irony there being that I had my first visit to an ophthalmologist in that building back in the very early 70s!)
I also happen to agree with him. I quite like the Professional Building, except for that ghastly entrance with it's mismatched podiums. I wish they'd found a way to preserve the original and still fix the podium and expanded to zero setback on the corner.

Having said that, this is better than the status quo. Small pat on the back given.
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 2:38 AM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
and here is an example of what not to build here.....dear lord

That's the funniest thing I've ever seen .... well, except for maybe the Dallas Stars missing the wide open net from three feet out, and then watching the Oilers take it back up ice to tie the game with two seconds left.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 2:51 AM
Auditor Auditor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Anyone heard anything about when Icon II will be going on sale, was suppose to be Jan last I heard- but it doesn't look like that is likely.

Also anyone heard anything what the price per sq/ft will be around? or any guesses?
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 2:56 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
350 - 400 per sq ft, is what I hear. Sales should start shortly.
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 3:40 AM
TimB09 TimB09 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
so boys....whats next to be announced?
I'm gonna say...Founders Ridge breaks ground

And Mandel announces the 30 story office tower

(Hey, one can only dream )
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 3:54 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Tell me - Why would Mandel announce an office tower? Is he going to buy one? Did Mandel announce the Icon towers?

Sorry, I've heard this lots before. I'm doubtful the mayer would announce it. Perhaps further explain it to the public after the fact.... but not make it public.

Oh, and here is a PANO I took Saturday. Guess where :>


It's available in HUGE format if you want to see it.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 4:09 AM
TimB09 TimB09 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
Tell me - Why would Mandel announce an office tower? Is he going to buy one? Did Mandel announce the Icon towers?

Sorry, I've heard this lots before. I'm doubtful the mayer would announce it. Perhaps further explain it to the public after the fact.... but not make it public.

Oh, and here is a PANO I took Saturday. Guess where :>


It's available in HUGE format if you want to see it.
Well ok. Maybe he won't mention it. But he has always said they are in negotiations with companies about a new building.
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 4:16 AM
sdimedru sdimedru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 741
if that's marmot...... how did you get away from the wind!???

i was there on the weekend aswell.... windy as-hell!
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 5:19 AM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimB09 View Post
I'm gonna say...Founders Ridge breaks ground

And Mandel announces the 30 story office tower

(Hey, one can only dream )
well, dream in one hand, shit in the other. See which hand fills up first
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 5:51 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdimedru View Post
if that's marmot...... how did you get away from the wind!???

i was there on the weekend aswell.... windy as-hell!
was very very windy!!! Mustve been good timing. Upper half of the mountain wasnt even open
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 7:39 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
Greetings from your southern neighbour.

This:


looks really cool

As for the Professional building, I'm on the board of a heritage preservation group down here, and my personal mantra is to preserve what's beautiful, and save what's ugly, but get rid of what's boring. By ugly I mean things that were designed to look that way, tastes change.

That said, the new design also looks great, but I'm guessing the era of the original style has a lot less examples in town than the all glass clad replacement.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:06 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.