Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy
For sure, that’s why i said “not necessarily”. I just don’t think we should automatically assume sites are “vacant because of remediation”
|
It's the most obvious explanation. With a few well-known exceptions Downtown, most long-term vacant sites are former gas station locations. There was
an article about it over a decade ago, and nothing much has changed (and some of the sites are still vacant!)
Patrick Johnstone wrote
a detailed explanation in 2013 of why some sites can be developed relatively quickly, and other take years, or decades. The era that the station was built partly explains the differences. If it was originally a single walled tank, there will almost certainly be deep deposits of hydrocarbons, even if the tank was replaced. Sometimes developers discover there had been a much earlier gas tank that had been decommissioned, and a different use had replaced it. Qualex Landmark sought
compensation for a site in Dunbar that had seen the gas station removed years earlier.