It is a very dleung move to wade in, call anyone to the political right a MAGA supporter, and then create multiple strawmen by invoking 9/11 unprompted, and somehow conflating opposition to university encampments with carpet bombing Gaza.
To the extent that Nouvellecosse brought the issue of anti-semitism within the pro-Palestinian movement up, it is remarkably disingenuous to claim that the explicitly genocidal 'River to the sea' chant is not a feature of pretty much all pro-Palestinian activism.
There is a reason the two parties that could form government here, as well as the governments of nearly all western countries, won't countenance the pro-Palestinian/anti-Western/ implicitly pro-terrorist movement. The Liberals have returned to the centre and seemingly rejected that fringe, for whom the Israel-Palestine conflict is a viable proxy for attacking western value systems without explicitly rejecting them.
Also, this:
Quote:
|
Some Palestinians said 'from the river to the sea', so we have to let Israel carpet bomb them"
|
must be one of the laziest bad-faith takes, for multiple reasons, posted here in some time.