HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: Who has the more positive vision for Canada's future?
Mark Carney's Liberals 176 73.95%
Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives 62 26.05%
Voters: 238. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3201  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:22 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Well, it didn't take long for that one to be found and outed.

https://x.com/MarkDWiseman/status/1661024938432798725

I can already smell from here the ink on the Bloc Québécois posters being printed right now.
Why does this anger Quebec? Can't they compete for immigrants to Canada?
     
     
  #3202  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:31 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Poilievre Carney confirms capital gains tax hike will not proceed. Another Con policy Carney is using to get elected.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3203  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:32 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Why does this anger Quebec? Can't they compete for immigrants to Canada?
You follow Canadian politics closely and aren't aware that Quebec has issues with this, and why they do?

(This is an honest question, BTW.)
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #3204  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:44 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Carney “opposed to having preset caps or preset restrictions on preset timelines."

YET

“Mark Carney will maintain oil and gas emissions cap”, environment minister says

Soooo what is it, Mark?


“Something that my government is going to do is to use all of the powers of the federal government, including the emergency powers of the federal government, to accelerate the major projects that we need in order to build this economy and take on the Americans,” Carney said.

When asked about if Carney would ever “impose a pipeline on Quebec”

“I would never impose,” a pipeline on Quebec” says Carney.

Soooo what is it, Mark?

This guy cannot be trusted, he doesn’t have any clear path, other than those he has taken from the Cons.

Wasn’t a part of Brookfield head office move to New York to avoid tariffs …. Annnd that was a lie

Canada is major semiconductor to the US… annnd that was a lie (or at least completely out of touch.

Carbon tax on industry has no economic bearing on the consumer. Annnd that was a lie.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3205  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:50 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
Poilievre Carney confirms capital gains tax hike will not proceed. Another Con policy Carney is using to get elected.
Glad the adult who wears a suit well is making good / sensible decisons. Great leadership - Canada is in good hands with Carney!
     
     
  #3206  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 8:54 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshsparrow View Post
Glad the adult who wears a suit well is making good / sensible decisons. Great leadership - Canada is in good hands with Carney!
Glad the Lib supporters are finally seeing the light and continue to support Carney as he takes items straight from the Poilievre platform.

Canada is in good hands, so long as Carney isn’t lying, which he has proven to do over the last 2 weeks.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3207  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:00 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by lirette View Post
...I can't find it right now but I believe the population growth under harper would have got us to almost 90 million by 2100. Is it really that much of a difference?...
This is just a rough calculation, but using an online population growth calculator I get the following:

Population growth during Mr Harper's terms from 2008 (33.2M) to 2015 (35.7M): 1.04%

Applying that growth rate from 2015 to 2100, we'd have a population of roughly 86 million.

Looking at the Trudeau years, from 2015 (35.7M) to 2024 (41.5M est.): 1.69%

Applying that growth rate from 2025 to 2100, we'd have a population of roughly 125 million.

So, somewhere in between the Harper and Trudeau immigration rates, we get to 100 million in 2100.
     
     
  #3208  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:07 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
The calculus is changing daily. I wouldn't wipe Pierre off the map just yet. Everyday I go back and forth, PP is doing this right and then not doing this right. Carney's penchant towards social justice, I find worrisome but I like how he can handle Trump.
I am certainly not writing off PP. Quite the contrary, I have stated numerous times that talking to a bunch of bankers in a well controlled room at the Four Seasons is a completely different scenario than talking and motivating the masses and being able to think fast on your feet at a debate and Carney has shown he is no orator.

Also, so far Carney has had a pretty easy ride. He has gotten tons of media {both domestic and international} attention and has been presented as Canada's knight in shining armour but that is already starting to change. Increasingly his duplicity in his support for pipelines is being shown saying one thing in Quebec and another in BC. Or his rants about climate change while he invests in overseas highly polluting ventures. His hypocrisy in the carbon tax is also quite glaring. Carney has a lot of baggage of his own that he will have to explain.

He does benefit from one thing however, Singh and the NDP's plunging support who will much more likely go Liberal than Tory. The NDP are now basically irrelevant and are going to get pulverized. The media hardly even talks about them anymore and in politics, as in life, there is only one thing worse than being talked about and that's not being talked about.
     
     
  #3209  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:20 PM
Hecate's Avatar
Hecate Hecate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
So Carney's $500k trip to Europe must be making you apoplectic. I suppose you're happy with 24 Sussex being a dilapidated mess too.

You aren't a serious person.
Maybe carney should have brought back parliament before galavanting around the world meeting with leaders. Maybe he should call an election and become an elected member of the house so he can actually do his job.

Decades of government neglect on a national historic site… what a surprise.

At the same time I call bullshit on it costing $42 million to fix.
     
     
  #3210  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:28 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecate View Post
Maybe carney should have brought back parliament before galavanting around the world meeting with leaders. Maybe he should call an election and become an elected member of the house so he can actually do his job.

Decades of government neglect on a national historic site… what a surprise.

At the same time I call bullshit on it costing $42 million to fix.
Conservatives have been yelling for an election for a long time. Now they'll get one and will probably scream that we didn't need one. Sneaky Carney.
     
     
  #3211  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:30 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,217
"I think Premier Smith's demands are very reasonable," Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says when asked about Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's demands for the next federal govt, which she warns if not met could lead to "an unprecedented national unity crisis."

https://x.com/CPAC_TV/status/1903103863206367426

-----

If I didn't know any better, I would swear that PP is deliberately trying to lose the election. Smith has established herself as a Quisling, and is extremely unpopular everywhere in Canada, including Alberta.

There is also an ongoing RCMP investigations, dealing with UCP corruption.
     
     
  #3212  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:33 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Ottawa announces $200M contribution toward Cedar LNG project in B.C.

https://calgaryherald.com/business/energy/ottawa-200-million-cedar-lng-project-bc?tbref=hp

Quote:
Federal Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson says the need to build a resilient economy with new export opportunities for Canadian energy suppliers has never been clearer.

JUST in time for the election!

Great work Libs!
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3213  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:41 PM
Hecate's Avatar
Hecate Hecate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshsparrow View Post
Conservatives have been yelling for an election for a long time. Now they'll get one and will probably scream that we didn't need one. Sneaky Carney.
Pierre will destroy carney in the debates and we’ll probably end up with a conservative minority. According to angus read about half of the liberals support now is soft, so not fully committed voters.
     
     
  #3214  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:50 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,575
Wooo CPC is scared s---less of Carney. He must be doing something right.
     
     
  #3215  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:51 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,931
That's a lot to put on a debate.....could be too late by then.

Last edited by trueviking; Mar 21, 2025 at 11:15 PM.
     
     
  #3216  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:52 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecate View Post
Pierre will destroy carney in the debates and we’ll probably end up with a conservative minority. According to angus read about half of the liberals support now is soft, so not fully committed voters.
Pierre just like the CPC leadership will try to do everything to avoid the debates. He can apple chomp to a journalist, won't be so easy during the debate to avoid the hard questions. Three word slogans "Boots not suits" won't cut it.
     
     
  #3217  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 9:54 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecate View Post
Pierre will destroy carney in the debates and we’ll probably end up with a conservative minority. According to angus read about half of the liberals support now is soft, so not fully committed voters.
The massive uptick in their support has come from NDP and Bloc, with them at all-time lows in supoort. I don’t think it’s out of the question that the Lib support will diminish simply because I’d think NDP and Bloc will gain more support throughout the campaign…

I’m not expecting anything and will absolutely not even try to predict an outcome. TBH I am happy how the Libs have adopted the conservative platform, for the most part, especially seeing they are investing in LNG export - not that they need to, all the energy wants is regulatory approvals removing the unnecessary red tape. They have never ever asked for a dime from the government. Definitely a vote grab, but, good on em.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3218  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 10:30 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshsparrow View Post
Pierre just like the CPC leadership will try to do everything to avoid the debates. He can apple chomp to a journalist, won't be so easy during the debate to avoid the hard questions. Three word slogans "Boots not suits" won't cut it.
Hard questions and Canadian political debates really don't have much in common, I'd say.
     
     
  #3219  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 10:38 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Wooo CPC is scared s---less of Carney. He must be doing something right.
Doing something right? They are running on the conservative platform! Libs are buying it too.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3220  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2025, 10:55 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Wooo CPC is scared s---less of Carney. He must be doing something right.
Judging from the zealotry of the far left posts here, I would say the opposite, which is odd because I think Carney will win more than it seems you guys do.

You guys post as if politics were part of your self esteem. Do you guys have to guzzle all the KoolAid?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.